Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Analysis of Spam, and a Proposed Solution

ilikecake Re:Joe Jobs, Forgery, Legitimate URLs (370 comments)

It always seemed to me the easiest solution to spam would be to make it illegal to forge the return address with big civil/punative damages otherwise. If the return address has to be either from the sender or the company they represent then it's easy to harass them to stop sending you messages. If it the return address is forged, you can bet there's lots of people that want to make money by finding out where who it's from and suing the crap out of them. Kinda like bounty hunters. There's no free speech issues since you can still technically email out any content you want. Obviously IANAL and also easily amused by shiney objects but it seems a simpler and cheaper solution than redesigning SMTP/throwing technology at the problem. If there's no money in spamming, it would stop.

more than 10 years ago


ilikecake hasn't submitted any stories.


ilikecake has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?