Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



Serious Security Bugs Found In Android Kernel

inf0rmer Different builds (230 comments)

With so many different builds of Android, these issues may or may not exist on other phones..

more than 4 years ago

Hacking Hi-Def Graphics and Camerawork Into 4Kb

inf0rmer Well.. (255 comments)

All our base belong to you.. This is truly awesome..

more than 5 years ago

Earth's Species To Be Cataloged On the Web

inf0rmer Ahh.. (147 comments)

All your genomes are belong to us...

more than 7 years ago



User ID's

inf0rmer inf0rmer writes  |  more than 7 years ago

inf0rmer (545195) writes "I work for a company that has grown rapidly over the past 5 years, and is now starting to run out of ID's to assign to new people who are being hired.

Employee Number
Each employee has a unique identifier assigned to them which started at ID# 1 and is now at around 30,000. When a person leaves the company the number is not re-used, so in reality we have less then 30,000 employees. We are not running out of this number.

Each employee also has an identifier assigned to them across the technology domain, which is in effect their login ID. These are 6 characters long, the first three of which signify what sort of user they are, and the last three represents the employee's initials. This is the problem area.

Examples of valid usernames for our company (ABC Corp) could be:

+ ABCMJS — User account belonging to Mary Jane Smith
+ ABCJ9B — User account belonging to John Brown (digit 9 generated randomly to differentiate from other people with the name John Doe)
+ ADMWPS — Adminsitrator account belonging to William Patrick Smith
+ TST123 — Test account used for development

Generally speaking, everyone has ABC in the front of their Login ID (and in some cases this is hard-coded in various applications; another problem altogether). We now have so many employees that we are running out of Employee ID's and an impact study has to be performed to see what systems will be affected if we were to change the format. We could use the Employee Number as the identifier, or a randomly generated number of some length, but after scouring Butler and Gartner as well a number of other reputable sites I could not find any indication of what is the best way forward.

Some people believe that the Employee ID should be reflective of their name (maryjanesmith), and some do not (8293489) — I believe there are merits for both; so, what format Employee ID would you use and why?

+ Random number, or alpha-numeric
+ Sequential Employee Number
+ Firstname+LastName
+ Or something else?"


inf0rmer has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?