×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Student Records Kids Who Bully Him, Then Gets Threatened With Wiretapping Charge

jfengel Re:WTF?? (790 comments)

Hey, thanks for that. I find it kind of odd that "wiretapping" has come to refer to live conversations. Though for that matter, I find it kind of odd that it extends even to the two parties a phone call; yes, there's a wire, but both are speaking voluntarily, and the term "wiretapping" was coined to refer to a third party listening in.

I know that people have an idea that there's some kind of privacy even in public: you want to be able to do stuff with other people around but not be remembered. I find that expectation kind of odd; cameras and recording devices are older than anybody alive and we've all grown up with it. So people are apparently trying to legislate a forgetfulness, but I suspect that expectation is gradually going to change.

3 days ago
top

Student Records Kids Who Bully Him, Then Gets Threatened With Wiretapping Charge

jfengel Re:WTF?? (790 comments)

OK, down-thread somebody cited the actual law, and sure enough, it DOES include live conversation. Weird.

3 days ago
top

Student Records Kids Who Bully Him, Then Gets Threatened With Wiretapping Charge

jfengel Re:WTF?? (790 comments)

OK, fancy-pants article-reader, 'splain me this:

Why "wiretapping"? I'm not a legal expert (obviously); has the term "wiretap" come to also refer to live conversations?

3 days ago
top

Retired SCOTUS Justice Wants To 'Fix' the Second Amendment

jfengel Re:Militia, then vs now (1574 comments)

I don't think that's necessarily the case. Rather, the Second Amendment can be seen as vague, yielding several interpretations, especially in light of its ungrammatical "prefatory clause".The Supreme Court's current interpretation of it effectively ignores that clause; the notion of a "militia" simply doesn't enter into its reading one way or the other. The Founders' intent is unclear, and Stevens is proposing to clear it up... in his direction.

Now that the Supreme Court has spoken, it becomes the law of the land. If 500 Floridians had voted differently back in 2000, maybe the justices would have spoken differently, but they didn't. So now, the only way to change the interpretation of that baffling "militia" clause is to change the wording.

Which is a notion so utterly quixotic that I can't imagine why Stevens is wasting his time penning the editorial. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that it reinforces just what you said: since there is less chance of altering the Second Amendment than there is of me flapping my arms and flying to the moon, the current interpretation will stand. Whether that's what the Founders intended is irrelevant.

(And given the changes in what "arms" are over the past two centuries, I don't think that's unreasonable. What's unreasonable, sadly, is that the divide is so deep among Americans, and the legislative processes so focused on stasis, that there's absolutely no forum in which we can meaningfully discuss the possibility of change.)

3 days ago
top

IRS Can Now Seize Your Tax Refund To Pay a Relative's Debt

jfengel Re:Over 18 (630 comments)

I think I see what's happening now. It's been sensationalized.

The news being distorted to make for a more paranoia-inducing headline? On my Slashdot? Unpossible!

4 days ago
top

This 1981 BYTE Magazine Cover Explains Why We're So Bad At Tech Predictions

jfengel Re:That micro-floppy (275 comments)

They're both removable storage, but even that function is conceived very differently now. Floppies are intended to be swapped in and out; the picture even depicts somebody sliding one in. They had very small capacity, and you'd use multiple floppies as an organizational tool the way we now use directories. (MS-DOS had directories, but CP/M just had a flat file structure since it only supported 200k floppies anyway.) The idea that a chip that small would also store 1000x more data would have been dismissed as hilarious.

SD chips tend to be fairly immobile: some are removable (especially on devices like cameras), but in most cases they tend to just stay there. You can get the SD card out of my phone, but you have to remove the case and a battery to get to it. We've substituted networking for most of the "removability" of a floppy drive. I know that some printers still support using SD cards as sneakernetting, but I suspect that more and more cameras will just end up with built in networking. The main reason to remove the chip will be to put in a bigger one.

4 days ago
top

NASA To Send SpaceX Resupply Capsule To ISS Despite Technical Problems

jfengel Re:WHOSE technical problems? (71 comments)

Thanks. The summary has a spectacularly ambiguous pronoun.

5 days ago
top

Can the ObamaCare Enrollment Numbers Be Believed?

jfengel And that's surprising why? (722 comments)

There was a deadline. People put stuff off to the deadline, especially when it means it's going to cost them money.

For comparison, this page has a graph of tax-related Google queries. Big shock: they spike right before deadlines in January and April. (That's a proxy for tax filings, for which I couldn't find a decent source. I suspect that tax filings are probably even more spread out, since many people get money back and would rather do it early.)

Combined with problems that would have caused people who tried earlier to fail, it doesn't seem at all likely that numbers would go up by a factor of 2/3. If you'd told me it was an order of magnitude, I might have been surprised. IBD has a history of a negative view of the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare") and so I'm not especially inclined to see their incredulity is anything other than ideology.

about two weeks ago
top

Rover Curiosity Discovers Australia-Shaped Rock On Mars

jfengel Re:I'm trying (99 comments)

It's not squinting, it's the mental rotation. You're viewing it from a point to the south-east. The bottom edge of the rock in the photo is roughly the east coast. The notch in the lower left is roughly the Great Bight.

The distinctive northern tip of Queensland is entirely absent, and in fact the whole "north coast" of the rock is Just Plain Wrong. You really have to be kinda desperate to want to see it. But for that matter, you kinda have to be desperate to consider this news.

about two weeks ago
top

Elite Violinists Can't Distinguish Between a Stradivarius and a Modern Violin

jfengel Re:Sorry about the loss of the magic (469 comments)

Yeah, I had actually intended to downplay that sentence a bit. Cremona had several great luthier families; Stradavarius got the biggest name but the others were at least in the same range. It would be fascinating to see just how Cremona came to be the center of fine instrument making.

about two weeks ago
top

Elite Violinists Can't Distinguish Between a Stradivarius and a Modern Violin

jfengel Sorry about the loss of the magic (469 comments)

People have some kind of innate (or maybe learned, but deep) fondness for "authentic". They'll pay for things that were touched by celebrities, as if there's some kind of magic that's transmitted through it.

These were, almost surely, the best violins available. The Stradavari family had extraordinary skill, surpassing anybody else at the time. It's remarkable and amazing that it should take us centuries to make other instruments with similar precision, balance, and quality.

But it's not amazing that we should eventually do so. There was no magic to these instruments, just tremendous hard work and a commitment to quality. These are rare, but hardly unique, especially over the course of centuries.

Let us appreciate these for what they are: remarkable artifacts of history, hand-made to extreme precision, durable enough to stand the test of time and be selected for their quality. There's no point in adding an additional layer of BS about some magic, unattainable extra that can't possibly be reproduced. It doesn't diminish the instrument, nor does it make every hack a great musician. Great instruments and great musicians will continue to make great music; surely that should be enough without sullying it with gullibility.

about two weeks ago
top

Data Mining the Web Reveals What Makes Puzzles Hard For Humans

jfengel Re:what can we infer about puzzles easy for humans (44 comments)

Has anybody tried to hook Watson up to a crossword puzzle? Its Jeopardy-answering skills should give it a substantial jump on the puzzle, and combined with the combinatorial crunching power of a computer should be able to narrow down a lot of places to the point where it can just plain guess. Which is what a lot of human players have to do when faced with overly "clever" clues anyway.

Some puzzles have extra thematic elements that would make it tricky for a computer (such as misspellings), though a lot of these are really just a matter of practice for humans as well: "Oh, this is the kind of language game you're allowed to play." A computer might not be able to induce that kind of rule, but if you code for it it can probably take some fine guesses.

about two weeks ago
top

Researchers: Rats Didn't Spread Black Death, Humans Did

jfengel Re:actually, it was the fleas. (135 comments)

Ya know... this is why I come to Slashdot: the comments that are more informative than the article. Doesn't happen often enough these days. Thank you.

about three weeks ago
top

CISPA's Author Has Another Privacy-Killing Bill To Pass Before He Retires

jfengel Re:I always find it interesting. . . (138 comments)

There have always been strong-on-defense conservatives. Anti-communist zealots who were happy to sacrifice a lot of liberty for a little temporary safety had their biggest prominence during exactly the time that today's conservatives hold up as the ideal time of American values.

What I find interesting is the way it's costing them an opportunity to go against Obama. Obama's own party is largely unhappy about continued NSA spying. Even Dianne Feinstein, who is from very liberal San Francisco but has been a defender of the American intelligence community from her position on the Select Committee on Intelligence, finally got fed up with it last week.

Politically, it would be a good time for libertarians to try to pry liberals away from the Democrats. But the libertarians have made their primary political home with the Republicans for some time; there is a separate Libertarian party but it never fares well due to vote-splitting. Republicans won't easily be able to switch away from a position that put national security over liberty, even when they've got a golden opportunity to use it to embarrass Obama.

Since Obama himself is making proposals to limit (but hardly stop) NSA spying on Americans, in an ideal world you'd love to see everybody come together to try to reach a point where at least a majority can say, "Yeah, I feel OK about changing the situation, even if I'd rather have more security or more defense from intrusiveness." But sadly for the state of American politics, it seems mostly like an opportunity for both extremes to oppose the center.

about three weeks ago
top

Wal-Mart Sues Visa For $5 Billion For Rigging Card Swipe Fees

jfengel Re:Customers may benefit... maybe (455 comments)

It's interesting that they can have people so aware of the price difference when it's numerically comparatively small. It's about 2%: not trivial, but you need to be literally counting pennies to notice it.

There are, unfortunately, many people in America who do need to count pennies. But I wonder what fraction of Wal-Mart shoppers are in that position, and how many think "low prices" when they wouldn't actually notice the difference?

I mention this only because I suspect that Americans tend to put price over other considerations, including quality, convenience, and even conscience. I wouldn't tell people how to shop, but I wonder how many people might be better off (by their own measures, whatever they are) to say, "OK, I'll spend an extra eight cents to buy this package of crackers at a store where the employees seem happier" or "I've noticed that the reviews of the Wal-Mart vacuum cleaner aren't as good as the ones at the other department store; I'll spend the extra $10 and get one that does a better job."

Or not. There are surely plenty who truly do need to save the eight cents on the package of crackers, and there but for the grace of God go I. But I am genuinely curious how many seek to minimize the price simply because it's the easiest factor to optimize.

about three weeks ago
top

The Highest-Flying Wind Turbine

jfengel Re:Helium (143 comments)

Interesting. Is that because hydrogen is diatomic, and thus always bigger than monoatomic helium even though the atoms themselves are smaller? Or does it have something to do with helium's inertness?

about three weeks ago
top

U.S. Court: Chinese Search Engine's Censorship Is 'Free Speech'

jfengel They do anyway (284 comments)

Like it or not, the government does exclude some speech from being "free". Threats and defamation are excluded, as is the ever-popular "shouting fire in a crowded theater". Even obscenity can be limited, though fortunately that exception has been narrowed in the past few decades.

Not that I want these to be the camel's nose under the tent. I'm just pointing out that the potential for abuse is already there. I think it's perfectly reasonable that you can't threaten somebody and call it "free speech", but it sets a dangerous precedent.

about three weeks ago
top

Bring On the Monsters: Tolkien's Translation of Beowulf To Be Published

jfengel Re:FINALLY! (94 comments)

If you haven't read it, in the past couple of years his son published his fragmentary version of the Arthurian legend. His alliterative verse was better in some places than in others (I loved it when it appeared as Rohirric poetry, not so much in the plodding and interminable verse version of the Beren and Luthien story), but it really popped there. He was trying to craft, in that way he does, a version such as might have been written by the earliest Germanic invaders after the fall of Rome, and as absurd as that sounds, I thought that it worked.

about three weeks ago
top

Bring On the Monsters: Tolkien's Translation of Beowulf To Be Published

jfengel Re:FINALLY! (94 comments)

Although Tolkien really was a gifted poet in so many ways, I often found his alliterative verse cloying. Modern English just doesn't have the right tone for it. His alliterative versions of Leithian and Children of Hurin don't, for the most part, do it for me.

I do wish he'd finished his Arthur story, though. That one came out last year, and it was genuinely great. He massaged various versions of the myths into one story that worked better than any of the existing tellings, and the alliterative verse really soared. (Plus, there were hints in his notes that Lancelot was destined to end up in Valinor, which would have amused the bejeezus out of me, but he never got around to writing it.)

So I'll be curious to see how I feel about this. Seamus Heaney's translation is going to be damned hard to beat. But regardless, Tolkien's version will tell us a lot about his thoughts on it, which will be fascinating. And from what I hear, he's using some archeological speculations, and I hope that there's commentary to see how much of that continues to be valid.

about three weeks ago
top

Bring On the Monsters: Tolkien's Translation of Beowulf To Be Published

jfengel Re:Please don't let Peter Jackson film this one (94 comments)

I respectfully disagree, but I can see why you'd think that. He has certainly made a career publishing the dregs of his father's work.

However, that's nowhere near as easy as it sounds. The handwriting is just the least of it. He's put in serious scholarly work on his father's material, comparing numerous revisions and tracing the evolution of the thought. He had collaborated with his father on the works for years: the famous handwriting on the Middle Earth maps is his, and they worked together to get The Silmarillion into a publishable form for over a decade. In fact, he really deserves coauthor, or at least editor, credit for The Silmarillion: the work was literally pieced together, paragraph by paragraph and sometimes sentence by sentence, from over a dozen different manuscript sources.

He was also a significant linguist in his own right. His work on the Saga of Hedrik the Wise is still referred to in the field. In order to be his father's amanuensis he had to speak several different languages, including all of the variations of Elvish that his father invented over the decades. (Every time the language evolved in his head, he turned the old version into Old Noldorin or Old Quenya or other such. It gives the language evolution tremendous verisimilitude, but is a massive headache for scholars.)

I'm not gonna deny that he's been prickly and has reserved a lot of the works to himself, which other scholars might have liked to have had access to. But I don't think it's fair to call him a "leech". His father made him literary executor, and I'm quite certain that his father would have approved of the course he's taken. He craved publication of The Silmarillion, and had tried for decades to get it into an acceptable form. Other papers weren't intended for publication, but they are of tremendous interest to scholars, and as a scholar himself Tolkien would surely have understood it. He specifically put many of his works in trust at Marquette for precisely that reason.

about three weeks ago

Submissions

top

Executive order makes government data open by default

jfengel jfengel writes  |  about a year ago

jfengel (409917) writes "Last week, President Obama issued an executive order titled "Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information".

Government information shall be managed as an asset throughout its life cycle to promote interoperability and openness, and, wherever possible and legally permissible, to ensure that data are released to the public in ways that make the data easy to find, accessible, and usable.

It relies heavily on a paper from the CIO, "Digital Government: Building a 21st Century Platform to Better Serve the American People.", issued in February."

top

Former Senator claims US government suppressing UFO evidence

jfengel jfengel writes  |  about a year ago

jfengel (409917) writes "Former Sen. Mike Gravel (D-Alaska) says the White House has helped keep the truth about the “extraterrestrial influence that is investigating our planet” from the public. He was joined by five former Representatives. Paradigm Research paid each $20k to appear at a press conference, at which Gravel said:

“It goes right to the White House, and of course, once the White House takes a position, ‘well there's nothing going on’...it just goes down the chain of command, everyone stands toe. ... The smoking gun of the whole issue, which is when they saw hovering space craft in Wyoming and South Dakota over the ICBM missile silos that the missiles couldn't work.”"

Link to Original Source

Journals

top

Theater

jfengel jfengel writes  |  more than 10 years ago Just on the off chance somebody comes to find out who I am, I'll stick in a plug for my theater group, The Rude Mechanicals. We put on really, really good Shakespeare in Laurel, MD. Half the cast reads Slashdot, and you've never seen Shakespeare until you've seen it performed by computer nerds. The other half are English majors. This is serious amateur theater.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...