We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!
kaiser423 (828989) writes "I'm looking to integrate some highly critical solutions into what would essentially be a remote, moving datacenter. No operators will be allowed at the site, and we may be able to have a high-speed INMARSAT data link. As a backup, we're planning to have multiple redundant low-speed Iridium data links.
We've been looking at remote in and out-of-band management solutions, and really have found a ton of products. However, the "low-bandwidth" solutions still exceed our potential Iridum bandwidth (~10kbps). Even if we have the INMARSAT link (192kbps sustained, higher burst), a number of these solutions would hit that limit. We're starting to look at going old-school with some terminal-style applications, but haven't found much of a market for it. PC Weasel looks kind of like it might work, but the demo doesn't work for Windows.
Essentially, we're looking to be able to power up/down and reboot some computers, and be able to start/stop some programs. We're willing to write the terminal interfaces necessary for our programs, and possibly do the remote desktop thing with some of our 3rd party programs. But what is out there that would give us this type of access, work robustly over a high-latency, low-bandwidth stream, and would be tolerant to intermittent network outages? Please hold the pick 2 of the 3 jokes, I know they're contradictory goals; I'm looking for a compromise here! These boxes would regrettably be nearly universally Windows boxes (with some VxWorks). It seems to be a market that died with 56k modems. Does anyone out there remember those days, and have any solutions that they preferred?" top
kaiser423 (828989) writes "I had been looking at replacing our mission communication infrastructure at my employer. Currently, we have a small panel that allows the operator to switch between talking on 6 pre-defined nets and listening to any combination. It's currently analog, noisy, and not reconfigurable. We've been bumping our heads against its limitations for some time now, and have been looking for a more dynamic, scalable system. I had suggested upgrading to a Voip system, like the Quintron Dices or the Orion Voip system. However, all of these systems are locked-down with no API! We would at least like to be able to programmatically interface with whatever solution we buy, and to roll our own hardware to run the systems where needed. Also, considering that this is mission-critical equipment, we would like to not be totally beholden to a vendor that could lock us in. I have been browsing the Asterisk and other forums, but no one in the OSS community seems to have the same need as me. I am open to rolling my own, but am totally new to the Voip world and am not sure where to start. Do any slashdotters have any suggestions?"