Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Working Toward a Patent-Agnostic Open Source License

kansas1051 Re:Software patents. (124 comments)

I would say that any patent that lacks hardware (chemical compound or physical device) wouldn't be valid.

Few patents target software per se. Most "software patents" actually claim (cover) computing hardware that implements some allegedly novel/non-obvious functionality. In any event, why allow someone to patent an application-specific integrated circuit that performs new function X but not a FGPA configured via a HDL that performs new function X?

more than 5 years ago
top

Apple Awarded Patent For iPhone Interface

kansas1051 Actually claim is very narrow.... (449 comments)

Despite all the FUD in the comments, Apple has patented a very narrow set of gestures. The claims of the patent determine its scope and not anything else. Claim 1 is:

1. A computing device, comprising: a touch screen display; one or more processors; memory; and one or more programs, wherein the one or more programs are stored in the memory and configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including: instructions for detecting one or more finger contacts with the touch screen display; instructions for applying one or more heuristics to the one or more finger contacts to determine a command for the device; and instructions for processing the command; wherein the one or more heuristics comprise: a vertical screen scrolling heuristic for determining that the one or more finger contacts correspond to a one-dimensional vertical screen scrolling command rather than a two-dimensional screen translation command based on an angle of initial movement of a finger contact with respect to the touch screen display; a two-dimensional screen translation heuristic for determining that the one or more finger contacts correspond to the two-dimensional screen translation command rather than the one-dimensional vertical screen scrolling command based on the angle of initial movement of the finger contact with respect to the touch screen display; and a next item heuristic for determining that the one or more finger contacts correspond to a command to transition from displaying a respective item in a set of items to displaying a next item in the set of items.

Although silly and probably invalid, the claim is limited to a very specific method of differentiating 1D vertical scrolls from 2D panning (using an angle of finger movement). One could easily implement multi-touch--and even 1D and 2D screen translation commands--with other methods.

more than 5 years ago
top

Apple Sued Over iPhone Browser

kansas1051 Re:Junk patent: lots of prior work (225 comments)

The patent goes back to November 1999. Good prior art would have to be published before November 1998 (your paper looks like it was published in 2001).

more than 5 years ago

Submissions

kansas1051 hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

kansas1051 has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?