Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



How a Wildfire Helped Spread the Hashtag

koekepeer Metadata (36 comments)

Something I never understood is why the hashtags need to count towards the 140 character limit - IMO they should be parsed out and stored as post metadata

about a month ago

Ask Slashdot: a Good Geek Project For My Arthritic Grandfather?

koekepeer Re:Not entirely relevant, but... (122 comments)

Totally relevant. And he is a great grandson, this shows great character. It is very rewarding to work together on something you love doing.

Also, it's heartwarming to see some true love and care instead of the sea of self-serving irony/cynicism that oftentimes dominates comments on /.

more than 2 years ago

Are Porn and Video Games Ruining a Generation?

koekepeer ^^ mod up! (1034 comments)

Excellent point.

more than 2 years ago

Multicellular Life Evolves In Months, In a Lab

koekepeer Re:Yes - sounds like "grant time" (285 comments)

IIRC from the times when I used yeast in my PhD research, wild type (that means: not mutated) S. cerevisiae clumps in advanced stationary phase (end of growth curve, nutritional deprivation). Such circumstances happen more often that not in the real life of S. cerevisae: just imagine that in nature it cannot walk to the nearest grapevine and say 'hey lets do some sugar fermentation here'... no it depends on being able to survive in times of drought. ne way it does that is through forming spores, another way of temporarily surviving could be this kind of 'clumping'. So, the 'clumping gene' is already there, it is just expressed in certain circumstances, circumstances easily simulated in a lab situation.

In my mind the argument would revolve around self-organisation versus (old, dormant) organisational information still present in the S. cerevisae genome. I'm bummed I cannot access the original article at the PNAS site, else I could comment on that in a bit more detail.

about 3 years ago

Assange: Facebook 'the Most Appalling Spy Machine' Ever

koekepeer "I've got nothing to hide" (520 comments)

Companies like Facebook base their income on the information they collect from you, and are therefore in a continuous arms race with you to lure you into giving out more information. I admire your absolute understanding of privacy choices on every level and nuance imaginable, but most of the other people in this world are less aware and more easily tricked... and even if they are rather smart, they make mistakes.

Is it therefore fair to put the onus on the person who has a Facebook profile to protect their privacy? Especially when the founder of Facebook has been on record a few times, stating that privacy is on a slippery slope anyway, and they'll just go with the flow? Especially when the "I've got nothing to hide" argument has been thoroughly debunked, because just about any information can be (selectively) used to incriminate you, even when you're entirely innocent?

As much as I am a fan of individual responsibility, I do believe that this tit-for-tat game of deception between social networking sites and their users is rather immoral on the side of the social networking sites, and that it is a cop out to say that the user is being stupid. This is where Assange draws the line, which is not paranoid, but realistic. They really are after eroding our privacy.

more than 3 years ago

GNU/Linux and Enlightenment Running On a Fridge

koekepeer Mass quantities of Bass Ale (222 comments)

E16 used to check for 'mass quantities of bass ale in fridge'... has this now become reality? I'm impressed

more than 4 years ago

Where Are the Cheap Thin Clients?

koekepeer Re:what the fuck are you on about. (349 comments)

I don't see how this topic is related to having sexual intercourse with your mother.

more than 5 years ago

10/GUI — an Interface For Multi-Touch Input

koekepeer stretching to type (344 comments)

I love the concept, but I imagine myself stretching over the touchpad area to type, which wouldn't be very ergonomical. I can also imagine that the base of my palms would rest on the touchpad area occasionally as I type.

more than 5 years ago

Linus Calls Microsoft Hatred "a Disease"

koekepeer Funny choice of words (634 comments)

from TFA: "Microsoft knows free software is not going anywhere ...."

Methinks that line is up for revision. Something like: "Microsoft knows that free software is here to stay..."

more than 4 years ago

Wikipedia's New Definition of Truth

koekepeer Re:Food for Thought (428 comments)

I agree with the parent post to a large extent, but I think that maybe some things get mixed up here with regard to who is responsible for what.

The extension of human knowledge through science is based on verifiable experimentation. If I do an experiment, and publish an article based on it, the reviewers of the article require that I specify the exact circumstances needed to find the published outcome. If others cannot repeat the experiments, the speculations in my discussion are unfounded and therefore discarded.

The problem is not one of relativism and Popperian verifiability issues. The problem is that people mix up the notions of information and truth. Information, from any source, can be seen as a form of communication. One can agree or disagree, and when something new is presented, the onus is on the information provider to explain why (s)he thinks this information is relevant to a certain problem.

In the case of Wikipedia, this becomes difficult, but it's not Wikipedia that's the problem, but a general property of compendia of knowledge. Printed encyclopedia, textbooks, reviews in scientific magazines all have this property: the presentation of conclusions.

Conclusions are not the outcome of scientific research, they are merely new questions asked to the scientific community. They state: I found X, and within the current state of affairs in this discipline, I think it means Y. Sometimes Y becomes a temporary truth, a dogma, but that's not the fault of science, but of people thinking they are right ;-)

The issue at hand is the issue of critical reading. When we criticise Wikipedia for being incorrect, we are actually saying that we want them to be trustworthy enough so that we don't have to be critical anymore.

If there is a general underlying problem, it is the problem of trust, and why people seem to have adopted the notion that they should assume the worst relying on the simple dichotomy of truth and lie. There are 'factual untruths' in Wikipedia, as there are in any encyclopedia. The problem is that anyone can edit, and that we don't trust them.

Now, without spinning off into conspiracy theory land, what are the variables influencing trust that someone's intentions are genuine? I can think of a few, but it's a problem that needs collaborative solving. After all, I may be 'wrong' ;-)

more than 6 years ago


koekepeer hasn't submitted any stories.


koekepeer has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?