Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.
Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.
Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!
Cracking a Crypto Hard Drive Case
(I bought that model FOR it's antenna figuring it wouldn't hurt, and might help). Adding that plastic antenna got them a marketing and competitive advantage. How many people were, like yourself, sold on the fact that "this adapter has an antenna, so it probably has better range!" and used this 'fact' to make their decision? I wouldn't necessarily consider it fraud, as you never know what internal design iterations the device went through. Maybe the initial design called for an actual antenna and the casing was designed around that. Perhaps later testing showed the antenna provided no actual gain and it was removed, but the cases were already in production. Perhaps a later revision removed the antenna, but the plastic case kept it in order to keep the device recognizable as part of the Freecom brand.
You immediately attribute to malice and fraud that which could be explained plausibly in several other ways. If the device worked as expected, real antenna or not, I fail to see the justification for your complaint. At worst, the design is a smart marketing decision; at best, it is a vestigial part from an earlier design iteration.
laymil hasn't submitted any stories.
laymil has no journal entries.