Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Simple Bug Exposed Verizon Users' SMS Histories

mabu Amazing technical incompetence (60 comments)

This really is security 101. Actually it's not even security 101, it's programming 101. You always assume the information fed to you is potentially invalid and qualify it.

How in their right mind could anyone at Verizon not check to see if the account id was legit? This is not a simple oversight. This is gross incompetence, or else it was intentionally left this way.

Don't these companies do security audits?

about 9 months ago
top

Pinball: a Resurgence In Retro Gaming From an Unlikely Place

mabu Re:will machines be more common? (107 comments)

The form we know as "pinball" is uniquely American. Bagatelle games are different. Bagatelle is more like gambling and based on chance.

In 1947, when Gottlieb, a Chicago-based company, introduced the first pinball machine with flippers, Humpty Dumpty. Things changed. Thereafter all games soon became flipper-pinball-machines.

about a year ago
top

Pinball: a Resurgence In Retro Gaming From an Unlikely Place

mabu Re:will machines be more common? (107 comments)

>I'm glad you think you're informed, but you're wrong in this case.

Reality shows otherwise. If pinballs were popular they'd still be in every bar. There'd still be arcades all over the place. There isn't.

Yea, there are a few retro-arcades and "bar-cades" popping up now, but they're just pandering to a retro audience at a moment when they have disposable income. The same still holds true for the new manufacturers. They're not really breaking into new markets except tapping into an existing market. It may be appearing to grow, but that's because it really doesn't have anywhere else to go. Pinball all but disappeared 10 years ago.

about a year ago
top

Pinball: a Resurgence In Retro Gaming From an Unlikely Place

mabu Re:will machines be more common? (107 comments)

The exception does not prove the rule. If pinball were still very profitable, they'd be all over the place.

about a year ago
top

Pinball: a Resurgence In Retro Gaming From an Unlikely Place

mabu Re:will machines be more common? (107 comments)

Games now cost in excess of $6500. It's no longer profitable to operate them. They are much higher maintenance than video games and neither bring in the coin-op money they used to. It is unfortunate since pinball really is a uniquely American form, a great combination of technology + mechanical design + art + culture.

about a year ago
top

Florida Accused of Concealing Worst Tuberculosis Outbreak In 20 Years

mabu Re:Political correctness in action (409 comments)

Ron Paul is against government regulation. His policies would only make corporate overlords more powerful and have less authority to answer to.

about 2 years ago
top

The US-Soviet Cyber Cold War

mabu spam (117 comments)

I think ground zero in the security war always begins and ends with the spam industry, which seems to be at the forefront of exploitation.

more than 3 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:In what Scientific Discipline is Religion relev (1123 comments)

You are confusing history with religion.

The bible also describes pi as being 3.0 - does that make it a math book? It also gives instruction on how to beat slaves. Does that mean it's a medical text? It provides details on what the fine one must pay if they kick a pregnant woman and cause her to lose her fetus. Does that make it helpful to economics?

more than 3 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:And (1123 comments)

God = Psychology
Religion = Economics

more than 3 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:religion is just stories about life (1123 comments)

Your argument is analogous to suggesting people call themselves a vegetarian and still eat meat. Most religions are mutually-exclusive of each other. Why attach a label to yourself that for thousands of years has been used as the impetus to oppress others?

more than 3 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:Science != Anti Religion (1123 comments)

The reason science cannot disprove religion such as Christianity is because most believers only selfishly care about what God gives to their life, instead of whether the environment/universe is created by God.

You just employed a Begging the Question fallacy. Science can and does routinely disprove religion, from the origins of life in the Book of Genesis to the ancestry of Native Americans in the Book of Mormon. Almost every religion has some material claim that can be tested and thus far, there's been no non-circumstantial, material evidence to indicate any supernatural claims are true. The onus is on those who believe to prove their claims are legitimate. Not the other way around. We don't have to "disprove religion", you have to prove, for example, that prayer makes a difference, and numerous scientific studies have shown that claim to be false. So science can and does disprove numerous religious claims. Can science prove god doesn't exist? No, and it's not our responsibility to do so, and regardless of whether or not we prove you wrong, that still doesn't mean your beliefs or supernatural claims about the origin of the universe are correct. That's a burden you must back up instead of trying to shift it upon the skeptics.

more than 4 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:False arguments (1123 comments)

the word 'faith' and correct me if I am wrong, but if something has no ontological status, you cannot argue for or against it.

Correct... until someone's faith-based beliefs intersect with the material world in the form of specific claims. Then their beliefs can be tested and proven or disproven, including:

* The power of prayer - Disproven by the Harvard Prayer Experiment.

* The creation myth of Genesis, disproven by numerous areas of science

* The origin of native Americans as dictated in the Book of Mormon, disproven by genetic science

* The claims of scientology, disproven by analysis of their e-meters other science fields

Religion has never been content with merely residing in a metaphysical realm, and that's when problems arise.

more than 4 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:Pretty straight forward... (1123 comments)

Everyone believes in science; not everyone believes in religion.

So technically, "science" is everyone's "religion."

Science centers around making decisions based on observation, testable and repeatable practices. 99.9% of what you do every day is dependent upon these constructs. If this were not the case, then people would try to jump off buildings instead of taking an elevator down; they would assume any substance could cure any illness, etc.

more than 4 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:Albert Einstein on Religion and Science... (1123 comments)

Letter to Eric Gutkind (partial) Albert Einstein (1954) Translated from the German by Joan Stambaugh...

... The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. These subtilised interpretations are highly manifold according to their nature and have almost nothing to do with the original text. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them.

In general I find it painful that you claim a privileged position and try to defend it by two walls of pride, an external one as a man and an internal one as a Jew. As a man you claim, so to speak, a dispensation from causality otherwise accepted, as a Jew the priviliege of monotheism. But a limited causality is no longer a causality at all, as our wonderful Spinoza recognized with all incision, probably as the first one. And the animistic interpretations of the religions of nature are in principle not annulled by monopolisation. With such walls we can only attain a certain self-deception, but our moral efforts are not furthered by them. On the contrary.

Now that I have quite openly stated our differences in intellectual convictions it is still clear to me that we are quite close to each other in essential things, ie in our evalutations of human behaviour. What separates us are only intellectual 'props' and `rationalisation' in Freud's language. Therefore I think that we would understand each other quite well if we talked about concrete things.

With friendly thanks and best wishes
Yours, A. Einstein.

Ref: http://freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Image:Einstein_letter.jpg

more than 4 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:I'll take the scientists over slashdot (1123 comments)

It says scientists at elite universities got that way by being diplomatic and avoiding unnecessary confrontation and controversy. It also says Slashdot readers are more intelligent. It's well established that the more intelligent one is, the more likely they are to subscribe to religion.

more than 4 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Re:Ecklund's definition of the term 'scientist'... (1123 comments)


207 economics
225 political science
205 psychology

My guess is the vast majority of polled non-atheists are members of the above groups, most of which don't typically participate in standard scientific studies using the scientific method.

more than 4 years ago
top

What Scientists Really Think About Religion

mabu Science v Religion (1123 comments)

The '"insurmountable hostility" between science and religion is a caricature

Not really. Science is based on testable theories and evidence. Faith is belief despite there being evidence, or in many cases in spite of contrary evidence. Science has dispelled everything from evangelical christianity (proving Genesis to be false) to Mormanism (proving Joseph's Smith's revelations are phony through Egyptology and DNA evidence). There's ample evidence to indicate that religion evaporates in the light of science.

more than 4 years ago

Submissions

top

Cause and effect of the financial crisis

mabu mabu writes  |  more than 5 years ago

mabu (178417) writes "There are a lot of e-mails flooding peoples' inboxes blaming the current financial problem on one politician or another, but is there really a clear cause-and-effect? Pile over at BSAlert.com outlines his take on the issue in a clear and to-the-point manner, identifying a few key laws passed in the last decade which led the way for the massive irresponsible activities on the part of the financial community. Can the finger actually be pointed at a specific person or group? You may be surprised."
top

Top 10 arguments for the existence of God

mabu mabu writes  |  more than 6 years ago

mabu (178417) writes "Since the dawn of civilization there have been many arguments for the existence of God. Surprisingly, the vast majority of these arguments fall into ten or so categories. Not much has changed in the last 300+ years in terms of new claims or evidence. The same core arguments turn up again and again, often dressed in new clothes (such as "Intelligent Design" or invoking bits and pieces of "Quantum Theory" but they're still the same arguments). How familiar are you with these?"
Link to Original Source

Journals

mabu has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...