Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



Pay-per-email and the "Market Myth"

matman Re:There is a precedent (295 comments)

I like having the sender pay the reciever whatever the receiver demands in order to accept the email. The receiver would have costs for unknown addresses (maybe higher costs for large messages), maintain a white list of senders for which no or a reduced charge will be applied and would be able to cancel charges once an email is read, etc. The sender, once knowing the charge for accepting the email, could simply cancel the attempt to send or accept the charges. This would of course require a micropayment infrastructure but would allow for recipients to have a much larger say over what they receive and spend time dealing with.

There should also be much better integration between subscription lists and whitelists, so that when one subscribes to a mailing list, that mailing list address is automatically whitelisted.

more than 8 years ago


matman hasn't submitted any stories.


matman has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?