Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Prospects Rise For a 2015 UN Climate Deal, But Likely To Be Weak

microbox Re:Really!?!?!? (133 comments)

It's amazing how replete with projection "skepticism" is. You probably don't even know what that means, and almost certainly couldn't process it if you did.

yesterday
top

Prospects Rise For a 2015 UN Climate Deal, But Likely To Be Weak

microbox Re:Senate approves international treaties (133 comments)

Yeah, I think that "skeptic" groups specifically target slashdot as a way to skew the conversation in their favor. "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." -- Russell

yesterday
top

Prospects Rise For a 2015 UN Climate Deal, But Likely To Be Weak

microbox Deal is the opposite to what you think. (133 comments)

The deal is actually the opposite. America doesn't really need to do much to meet Obama's target. The natural market-driven growth of renewables will do it, so long as the GOP doesn't play pick the winners and losers by slapping regulations. (*cough* Kansas *cough*). It may well cost the US consumer $0. China, on the other hand, is deploying huge amounts of new energy, and will fundamentally need to shift their plan in order to have emissions peak in 2030. But they want to do it anyway, since -- pollution, and they will be at the bleeding edge of renewables technology with will own carbon by 2030. Heck, wind is already price parity with coal, and solar is dropping fast. See Levelized cost of electricity by source. And I say all of this knowing that you cannot understand it, because you are a "skeptic" with the "truth". (Somehow not a contradiction -- but that's human nature for you.)

yesterday
top

Prospects Rise For a 2015 UN Climate Deal, But Likely To Be Weak

microbox Re:Too weak because humans are not the cause (133 comments)

If only the sun's output showed a trend. Gee, a bunch of ideologues with ties to industry providing you with the "truth" of climate change, eh? Sad.

yesterday
top

Prospects Rise For a 2015 UN Climate Deal, But Likely To Be Weak

microbox Single-year does not make a decadal trend. (133 comments)

A single year does not a trend make. It's a decadal trend. Average the temperatures on a decadal basis, and you will see that there was never an abatement from warming. Furthermore, most of the heat (90+%) goes into the oceans, which makes them rise (because they expand) and the signal is much less noisy. No abatement there either. And besides, 1998 wasn't the hottest year on record -- that's is an ambiguous statement -- and it was hot because of a record El Nino. The next record El Nino will blast 1998 to bits, unless there is some mitigating circumstance such as huge volcanic eruptions in the same year. And I say all of this fully aware that you cannot possibly understand it -- being a "skeptic" and all.

yesterday
top

Prospects Rise For a 2015 UN Climate Deal, But Likely To Be Weak

microbox Re:Er (133 comments)

Look up cherry-pick in the skeptics guide to science, 'cause that's just what you did on a decadal trend.

yesterday
top

Rooftop Solar Could Reach Price Parity In the US By 2016

microbox Re:Subsidies (504 comments)

Without. See levelized cost of electricity by source for more information. The formulas are complicated (because the world is complicated) so do some reading to figure out what is going on with them. If you have been watching these numbers for a few years -- as I have -- fossil fuels are in big trouble. They're already crying to the government to bail them out. It won't be long until box stores, data centers and factories switch. I think the big change-over will come around 2020. Obama's deal with China was really pretty cheap on his part. The chinese will actually have to do some work.

5 days ago
top

The Military's Latest Enemy: Climate Change

microbox Re:The Pentagon is more important than climate cha (163 comments)

He didn't say "immediate evacuation". Learn to read. At some stage in the future -- our children's future -- there will be ocean where Miami is. So there will be a permanent evacuation. Probably after some storm surge or king tide. Dummy.

about two weeks ago
top

Jesse Jackson: Tech Diversity Is Next Civil Rights Step

microbox Re:Mod parent DOWN (514 comments)

Ending the war on drugs would be a good step towards breaking down the honour culture that causes so many problems for some African Americans. Don't forget that this happens because of institutionalized incentive structures.

about 4 months ago
top

States That Raised Minimum Wage See No Slow-Down In Job Growth

microbox Re:Crazy (778 comments)

once the wage is in effect fewer new businesses will be created.

Just because you believe it doesn't mean that it is true. Even professional economists can't agree on such a simple statement, since the details are so complex. But whatever floats your boat Mr Dunning Kruger.

about 4 months ago
top

Apple Announces New Programming Language Called Swift

microbox Re:New bells and whistles (636 comments)

Then you're not using the correctly. If you understand how to design functional software (i.e., using closures), then you end up with far less code, and much better separation of concerns. Had to spend some time in lisp/scheme to really get it.

about 6 months ago
top

Shrinking Waves May Save Antarctic Sea Ice

microbox Re:News at 11 (298 comments)

This article is just another PRATT. No scientists are not ignoring the increase in sea ice. I think the parent comment reflects the depth of AGW opposition.

about 6 months ago
top

Fusion Power By 2020? Researchers Say Yes and Turn To Crowdfunding.

microbox Re:Bad move (280 comments)

Right, that would fit into an NSF grant. Also, their promo video says that they were the most read paper (in some time frame), but really, it would be more interesting to know how many times they are cited.

about 6 months ago
top

Fusion Power By 2020? Researchers Say Yes and Turn To Crowdfunding.

microbox Re:A matter of priorities (280 comments)

Yeah, and think of all the high technology jobs the UK would have created. Granted the military industry has big hooks into the government... and all that money talks...

about 6 months ago
top

Fusion Power By 2020? Researchers Say Yes and Turn To Crowdfunding.

microbox Re:Fusion power since 4.5*10^9 BC in space! (280 comments)

Gee how to do you know that that cannot be done. You see, maybe the technology isn't around now, or maybe it is, and the electricity infrastructure needs to be updated. But it is not entirely stupid.

about 6 months ago
top

Fusion Power By 2020? Researchers Say Yes and Turn To Crowdfunding.

microbox Re:Oh, sure (280 comments)

The financial industry is sitting on trillions of investment dollars that are looking for a home. Wonder who buys all that sovereign debt? That's because there's nothing better out there for all that money. Or at least, that's the financial industries story. We're really looking at the failure of financial institutions to manage investment dollars. They will only lift their game insofar as things like kickstarter forces them to.

about 6 months ago
top

US Climate Report Says Global Warming Impact Already Severe

microbox Re:sigh (627 comments)

Err no.

Haven't you heard about the consensus. (Before claiming that science is not consensus, that is a different issue, and a way to avoid the point, that the vast majority of scientists disagree with you.)

How can you tell if its a political document rather than a science. First sign is it came from a political organization. The second is that its not peer reviewed.

Oh yeah, there are problems in how the final language of the report is written, which every county pushing their special interests into the language. Don't change the fact that the scientists signed off on the document.

Try reading some of the citations in the report. See how well they match suggested claims in the report.

That's a howler, because I *have* read some of the citations of the report, and it seems very well written to me. If you a referring to some particular controversy in some paragraph (or sentence) of AR5, then you should (1) provide a citation, and (2) admit that the report is larger than one paragraph or sentence.

Yea i know several scientists that where involved with the last IPCC report and vowed never again.

I know of complaints from scientists about how the science gets watered down, and a rosey sheen is painted onto some parts of the problem. Doesn't change the central point that I was making: we can and must move to a carbon neutral economy. Quibbling over semantics won't change that at all.

about 6 months ago

Submissions

top

Studies show cap-and-trade is net economic benefit in 6 US states

microbox microbox writes  |  more than 2 years ago

microbox writes "t is axiomatic to some that cap-and-trade will wreck the economy and promote the type of corruption that both extremes of the political specturm decry. Vitreol and name-calling aside, both the science and the economics come down to an empirical question. For those who do not know, six US states have implemented cap-and-trade since 2001. On average, these states have faired as well or better than the rest of the USA according to standard economic indicators, and quantitative studies now show a direct economic gain to the region from cap-and-trade. Are conservatives too invested in nay-saying cap-and-trade to make an about face on the issue (e.g., Tony Abbott's expensive direction action alternative), or is the issue too polarized? When does empirical evidence make a difference to peoples beliefs?"
Link to Original Source
top

US health administrative costs 4x that of Canada

microbox microbox writes  |  more than 3 years ago

microbox (704317) writes "Free-market healthcare is a hot political topic, with both Republicans and Democrats heavily invested in their positions. Republicans often claim that US healthcare is the best in the world thanks to Adam Smiths' invisible hand. The US system certainly has advantages; however, no other country spends anywhere near as much on healthcare, and US physicians and administrative staff spend 4x as many hours per week dealing with payers and insurance companies as their colleagues in Canada. Is it possible that laissez-faire health-care is an inefficient solution, or are high administrative costs nothing to be concerned about, and reflect a more efficient and higher quality healthcare system?"
Link to Original Source
top

Mac savvy woman remotely photographs thieves

microbox microbox writes  |  more than 6 years ago

microbox (704317) writes "1010 Wins brings us a story about a woman who nabbed the two guys who stole her laptop. When they went online, she connected to it using "Back To My Mac", and then she used the laptop's camera to photograph the thieves. I'm not sure if that's a great sales pitch for potential switchers, however, I think that's kinda cool [dons tin-foil hat]."
Link to Original Source
top

Do schools educate students out of creativity?

microbox microbox writes  |  more than 6 years ago

microbox (704317) writes "Sir Ken Robinson wittily makes a profound case for creating an education system that nurtures creativity, rather than undermining it. "We are educating people out of their creativity," Robinson says. The universality of his message is evidenced by its rampant popularity online: "If you have not yet seen Sir Ken Robinson's TED talk, please stop whatever you're doing and watch it now." A transcript of his talk can be found here, however, the transcript is missing Ken's superb comic timing."
Link to Original Source
top

Typing faster than Intelligible Speech

microbox microbox writes  |  more than 7 years ago

microbox (704317) writes "According to this article, an average speedy "typist" works at about 35-40 words per minute — a professional around 70-95 words per minute. Yet I recently came across an article on machine shorthand that purports that a typist can reach 225-300 words per minute. That's faster than intelligible speech! The trick is to use a chorded keyboard where-by a user types whole syllables or words by striking multiple keys at once, a technique called "chording". Specialized hardware goes for between $US 1000-4000, however, I see no reason why we couldn't use a regular keyboard for chorded input. I failed to find any FOSS software like a text editor that lets you use your keyboard in "chorded" mode. Is this a better mouse-trap that's just waiting to be built?"
Link to Original Source

Journals

microbox has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?