Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



MIT Designs Tsunami Proof Floating Nuclear Reactor

muecksteiner Not a retarded idea. No way. (216 comments)

Compare the relative frequency of major hurricanes/typhoons to that of major earthquakes. Add to that the various potential problems that any floating structure has (springing a leak and sinking comes to mind here).

Then, consider that in Japan, the nuclear plant closest to the quake epicentre actually survived unscathed. Because the people designing it did not stick with the minimum legal specs for the seawall height like the geniuses at Fukushima had, but did some research on their own. And simply made the seawall much higher.

Conventional plants are not that bad, if they are designed by competent people. If you put them on barges, though, as these dudes are proposing, you are just adding to the potential failure modes, while not avoiding any that are impossible to handle. Not a good thing.

3 days ago

U.S. Biomedical Research 'Unsustainable' Prominent Researchers Warn

muecksteiner No shit, Sherlock (135 comments)

It sure took you some time to notice the bloody obvious, folks. The only odd thing about this is why you only mention biomedical research.

Because pretty much all other fields have exactly the same problem: fairly massive over-production of graduates - in particular, people with a PhD. In times of shrinking university enrolments, and shrinking populations (in the West, that is). No one will ever need that many faculty. And for most jobs outside uni, that time spent in PhD comics land is not a good preparation. At all.

about a week ago

Bugatti 100P Rebuilt: The Plane That Could've Turned the Battle of Britain

muecksteiner Oh my (353 comments)

Even by Slashdot standards, this is one of the dumbest headlines, ever.

Bugatti was no Nazi. He lived and worked in pre-war France, and was not a Nazi supporter at all. The reason the thing did not fly back then was because Bugatti, who had build the plane in France prior to it being invaded by Nazi Germany, successfully hid it from the invaders so they would not get their hands on it. Or rather, the technology used in it: in any case, the plane in the form it was built was never, ever, a "Nazi plane". Nor would it have been useful at all as a warplane: this thing, amazing as it is, is a pure racer, with zero capabilities for being armed. Nor would it probably have been much good in a dogfight, either: that crate was built to be fast, with everything else being a secondary consideration.

This headline is pure drivel, and really should be corrected ASAP.

about a month and a half ago

U.S. Waived Laws To Keep F-35 On Track With China-made Parts

muecksteiner Re:Magnets? How about jet engines? (348 comments)

Hey, but think of the bonuses the managers will be able to pay themselves for all the "growth" they are instigating. Suddenly makes the whole thing seem logical, no?

about 4 months ago

Ted Nelson's Passionate Eulogy for Douglas Engelbart

muecksteiner Re:Engerlbart's Greatness (110 comments)

No, that is merely a systemic problem at work that has always been an issue:


The skilled think that the impressive stuff they have done is easy, while the unskilled think the little they have contributed is the hottest thing, ever. Film at 11.

about 4 months ago

China's State Press Calls For 'Building a De-Americanized World'

muecksteiner Re:Summary says it all (634 comments)

You know of course that overspending has nothing to do with it.

Well, actually, overspending has everything to do with it. And for me as an outside observer, the whole Democrat vs. Republican thing is not relevant at all (at least from a personal viewpoint) when trying to make sense of the situation right now.

You should consider the following: just because Bush criminally over-spent during his tenure, this does not mean that the complaint against *continued* overspending done during the Obama administrations is invalid. Bush was lucky in that he inherited a U.S. administration that was in great financial health. And like so many other vices, overspending takes some time to generate *real* problems. Bush just had the totally undeserved good fortune that during his tenure, he could still expand the national debt like there was no tomorrow.

Obama can not do likewise - and perhaps the only real criticism against him ought to be that he, as an experienced politician with access to all information there is, should have seen this coming much earlier. And adapted his policies accordingly. Much sooner, than now. He did have the very considerable misfortune of inheriting the financial mess Bush made. But when you are in your second term, excuses along the lines of "the previous guy did it" become somewhat stale.

But I'd concede to you anytime that Obama had the deck stacked against him pretty badly from the get-go: what with the financial crisis bursting on his watch, and all that. He took the helm at a not so fun time in U.S. history. And I'd also concede to you any day that the U.S. conservatives seem to have a very disconcerting habit of blaming everything that is going wrong right now on a man who had not all that much to do with the creation of the fundamental problems at the root of it all (i.e. two Bush administrations that basically left the place in financial ruin due to brainless warmongering, a basically unsupervised and unhealthy financial industry going amok, and other idiocies).

about 6 months ago

China's State Press Calls For 'Building a De-Americanized World'

muecksteiner Re:Summary says it all (634 comments)

Well, actually, Thatcherism was not all bad. She did have her good sides: she destroyed the extreme trade unions, which had long lost sight of their purpose, and had turned into a cancerous growth that strangled the country. She gave Britain a new sense of moving forward. She got the finances in order. And she had the guts to stand up against the Warsaw Pact for, as it were, western values, in times when few in Europe were willing to. Also, she, as a person, was definitely not of the worst sort you see as a politician. As in: she took no bribes anyone was ever aware of, and was, at least on a personal basis, fairly honest.

However, as Tyrion Lannister so famously said in GoT, nothing before the "but" in a sentence counts. :-)

Even after taking all the undoubted merits of her tenure as prime minister into account, I still think she did more damage to the fabric of British society, than good. The main areas in which the Thatcher era was, especially in hindsight, disastrous are the following:

- It is all good and fine to shaft the kind of parasitic "caveman commie" trade unions she was dealing with. Shaft them well and thoroughly. That much was good conservative instinct, and good politics. But a truly great politician would have realised you have to put something else in their place afterwards, lest even worse stuff will fill the void in the medium term. But nothing was done, and labour relations, and with them the gaps between the classes, have grown alarmingly worse ever since. Amongst many other institutions, a functioning market based society needs something like trade unions, like it or not. If not in name, but in function. Basically destroying them was a very short-sighted and petty-minded victory.

- Overall, she was (and due to financial constraints, up to a point had to be) hell-bent on undoing a lot of the institutions aimed at increasing social cohesion which had been introduced over the previous decades. Such as the school system, which was much, much better when I was a kid, than it ever was afterwards. And arguably, the terminal decline of the state run school system started in the Thatcher years, during which everything that cost the government money was seen as an unnecessary expense. Even if in the long run incurring said expenses maid perfect sense - schools are a prime example of such an expense. But during the Thatcher years, the pendulum swung too far back. After excesses of state regulation, nanny state antics, and wasteful spending (there is a reason the movie "Brazil" was done in Britain, of all places), suddenly lots of sensible things were also thrown out of the window, along with the bad stuff. Perhaps inevitable in such circumstances, but still extremely damaging. Especially as few since then have really tried to repair this damage.

- Her tenure saw the birth of the modern financial sector in Britain, which has turned out to be a much worse cancer on society at large than any leftist structures could ever have been. And I'm saying this as a fairly conservative person who is not against banking, or even the financial industry per se. Far from it. But the anti-social, uncontrollable monster that is now the City was hatched in the "bugger thy neighbour, if there is profit in it" and "greed is good" era of Thatcherism, and has grown ever since.

- She herself was a more or less decent person, but the majority of chaps who got to power in her wake were not. Amoral, greedy little persons, to an alarming extent. Since she was boss at the time, I hold her at least partially responsible for this.

- And there is also something she is personally responsible for, with her jingoistic attitude towards all the other components of the UK - in particular, the Scots. When I was a kid (and I am Scottish), being pro-independence in Scotland was a quaint notion held by some university types. The high-handed and arrogant manner in which Thatcher in particular dealt with the early stages of the devolution process did a lot of damage to the Union, and to the idea of getting along within the UK. In terms of politicians being sensible in this regard, it did not get much better after her, of course. But at least in the timeframe after the war, she was the first prime minister who openly showed an active dislike for Scotland, and Scottish affairs. She let her personal feelings get the better of her, and this was absolutely not what was needed at the time.

I could go on, but these are some starting points, if you want to continue the discussion. :-)

about 6 months ago

China's State Press Calls For 'Building a De-Americanized World'

muecksteiner Re:Summary says it all (634 comments)

And as someone who is old enough to have witnessed some of it firsthand, I can only second this. Thatcherism is something you do not wish on anyone, not even your worst enemies.

If it were to happen, though, it would be interesting to watch what Thatcherism without a Labour party as punching ball would look like.

about 6 months ago

China's State Press Calls For 'Building a De-Americanized World'

muecksteiner Summary says it all (634 comments)

The Slashdot summary already nicely shows why the Chinese do have a point of sorts:

"a deal is close to reopen the federal government until mid-January and defer the debt ceiling debate until mid-February."

In other words, the only thing they seem to be able to come up with is a deal to kick the can down the road for four months - and in the meantime, in all probability do exactly nothing about the underlying fundamental problems which have caused this mess in the first place.

You know, these pesky little details, like the U.S. habitually spending way more than it actually takes in tax earnings. As in: WAY more. A bit more could be argued to work in some lets-fudge-the-books-and-rely-on-inflation-to-make-it-work way, but the U.S. is light years from that sort of sustainable level. And no one wants to admit it.

The bit where the Chinese are IMHO wrong is that it will need any sort of centralised planning to achieve this replacement of the U.S. as hub of the global economy. That will just happen, inevitably. The fundamentals are gone, no way the U.S. can stay where it is. What will come afterwards is very uncertain - but things can stay the way they are.

about 6 months ago

D-Link Router Backdoor Vulnerability Allows Full Access To Settings

muecksteiner Well, what do you expect (228 comments)

In most of the companies that do such gear, the chap(s) in charge of actually developing and making them are treated as disposable cost factors. Who are under constant threat of being outsourced to some third world country. And the products they develop are basically abandoned once the next release hits the shelves, otherwise the incentives to buy new stuff would not be as high.

All the while the Cxx who "supervise" them (and who in a lot of cases couldn't even configure the products the company makes, let alone really care) walk away with more or less obscene bonuses. You know, just to show the little guys who is boss, and so.

Not a big surprise, then, that the developers apparently don't put their entire energy in making the best possible product. Would you, in their stead?

about 6 months ago

Are the NIST Standard Elliptic Curves Back-doored?

muecksteiner Re:Why is EC more secure than RSA? (366 comments)

Now that you mention it, I seem to recall something about the crypto in NeXTStep being classified as a munition back then as well. That was before the "PGP printed on a t-shirt" campaigns had their effect.

And the rest of what you write is depressingly correct.

As others have already written in this thread, the upshot of the Snowden revelations of the past few weeks/months is that any trust that anyone worldwide might have had in computing products from the U.S. is gone forever. This whole incident will likely have done more to bring about the reduction of the U.S. computer industry from "dominant player" to merely "one of the players" than anything else.

about 7 months ago

Are the NIST Standard Elliptic Curves Back-doored?

muecksteiner Re:Why is EC more secure than RSA? (366 comments)

Heh - I even remember the elliptic crypto being introduced on NeXTStep. Talk about being a bit old. :-)

In retrospect, it might be interesting to try and find out why it was taken out again, later. And if the NSA (or some other spook outfit) had anything to do with it.

Apple, the successor to NeXT, has seemingly always been a very anti-crypto company. See the difficulties people had and have integrating GPG into Mail.app. It works, but it is far from being as seamless as it could be. I already wondered about this many years ago - the obstinate indifference of Apple towards end user crypto always looked a bit like it had been a stance adopted at the suggestion of some other party. I mean, Apple was always not particularly customer friendly, just like NeXT before it (the character of the founder showing, basically). But the way they never even for a second seemed to consider leaving decent crypto hooks in their systems was (and is) a low, even by their standards.

about 7 months ago

The $200,000 Software Developer

muecksteiner Re:Wanna earn $200K+? Two words... (473 comments)

I object to the part of your posting where you make it sound as if only money can do that sort of thing to you. In academia, you can easily find similarly defective personalities, who gleefully ruin everything for everyone around them.

What makes these people even more pathetic than the slime you find in the finance world is that the uni jerks don't even get large amounts of money out of it. They just do it to make people miserable, and to make sure no-one notices that they themselves are actually not nearly as smart as they pretend to be. There is a reason that something like PhDcomics exists, and parallels Dilbert to such a degree. PhDcomics is actually much less nasty than the real world. Unfortunately.

about 10 months ago

SOPA Creator Now In Charge of NSF Grants

muecksteiner Re:Learning from History... (307 comments)

It's the premise of science, sure. But not of, say, contemporary Islamistic thinking, which tends to gloss over this fairly important fact. Note that I said "Islamistic" here, and not "Muslims in general".

But certain shades of overly politically correct Western thinking tend to do likewise anyway - "OMG, the primitive Christian reconquista in the Iberian peninsula destroyed a scientifically vastly superior Muslim culture". All the while omitting the facts that the Iberian peninsula only came to be ruled by Arabs through an equally bloody war of conquest earlier, and that the "superior science" was only partly indigenously Arab: partly it was in-place left-overs from Antiquity that had been taken over, and partly it was the spoils of the semi-global wars of conquest that Islam had been conducting.

Note that I am not taking sides here, these are just intended as comments on the selective historical blindness which is causing so many problems in contemporary discourse.

about a year ago

SOPA Creator Now In Charge of NSF Grants

muecksteiner Re:Learning from History... (307 comments)

You have a point there. Up to a point, that is.

What you write is, by and large, the currently accepted mainstream narrative in Western culture. Two extremely important issues with this are frequently overlooked, though:

a) The scientifically advanced Islamic world of the early middle ages was the result of rapid military conquest of a sizeable chunk of places that were amongst the most advanced regions on the planet: the Hellenistic states, other left-overs from the Roman Empire, as well as various cultures on the Indian sub-continent. All these were conquered by force, and absorbed into the early Islamic states. And for some time, the new Muslim rulers presided over empires that were very technologically and scientifically advanced - because the regions they had conquered had already been very advanced before being absorbed into the new Islamic states.

And crucially, in the first few centuries, the ruling classes, and the clerics, did nothing much to impede the existing culture of science and letters in their new dominions - quite the contrary, they encouraged the spreading of technologies. Point in case: the "arabic numerals" you mention were brought to Europe from India by returning Arab conquerors. The scientific and cultural riches the Muslim rulers presided over were mostly not the product of Islamic culture per se, but they did not hinder the further development of what was there. And in some cases, considerable progress was actually made - there are a number of notable Muslim scholars from this era.

However, at some point, Islamic culture ossified (for reasons that are very complex, and not entirely understood even today), became increasingly hostile towards science, and created the backwards mess that we see today. It is crucial, though, to always bear in mind that the "golden age of Islamic culture" was never entirely a product of the Islamic world to begin with. Far from it, actually. Like everyone else, they heavily built on the foundations their predecessors had built.

b) The second point, that Europe only started to catch up once the influence of religion (read: Christianity) started to wane is simply not tenable, either. Not in a narrow reading, anyway. What happened from the Age of Enlightenment onwards was that the focus of society *and religion* changed in ways that made scientific endeavour possible and fruitful - crucially, without removing Christianity per se from public life, or the culture at large. Far too many scientists over time were Christian clerics for the narrow reading to be true: there are science-averse interpretations of Christian doctrine, but these are by no means exclusive, or dominant.

about a year ago

Declassified LBJ Tapes Accuse Richard Nixon of Treason

muecksteiner Re:If this is true... (536 comments)

Where are mod points when you need them. "Damnatio memoriae", the ancient Romans called this sort of procedure. With all we know about him by now, it would actually be most appropriate for someone like Nixon.

about a year ago

Crysis 3 Review: Amazing Graphics, Still a Benchmark Buster, Boring Gameplay

muecksteiner Re:Where's the realtime raytracing? (211 comments)

What you are saying there is what the Real Time / High Performance Ray Tracing crowd have been claiming since, what, 2001? Unfortunately for them, the stuff the "normal" graphics community has been able to come up with on graphics cards is always at least several notches better than what RTRT has been offering, ever since then. This is a chase that has been going on for a decade now, and the gap does not seem to be closing anytime soon. So the discussion you are trying to start here has been over for several years now - and it seems like no-one is listening to the RTRT crowd anymore. And with good reason.

This is not to say that the research conducted by the RTRT crowd was and is useless - far from it. The new high performance algorithms they came up with were instrumental in the resurgence of path tracing and such, i.e. modern highly realistic offline rendering techniques. But for gaming purposes, the party seems to be over. Remember: hacks are not hacks if they are capable of powering a well-selling game in a stable, repeatable fashion.

And indisputably true facts, like the bit about RTRT scaling so much better, can be true for all they like, but that does not automatically mean that they are also relevant for practical engineering in settings where people are trying to earn Real Money by writing games people end up buying.

about a year ago

Islamists In Bangladesh Demand Murder of More Bloggers

muecksteiner Please, label the parties involved correctly (389 comments)

This is not a dispute between left and right, at least not in the sense that we are used to in the so-called "West". The two antagonistic parties here are secularists on the one hand, and islamistic religious fundamentalists on the other. These two groups are not even in a very roundabout way related to the old left-right dichotomy we are used to. Except perhaps the fact that Western leftists also generally seem to weigh in on the secular side of things, but that is about the point where any similarities end.

about a year ago

How Open Source Could Benefit Academic Research

muecksteiner There is no incentive (84 comments)

This guy, who wrote an extremely useful and powerful piece of OSS software that is widely used in the graphics community, said it very well in his blog:


Basically, you are an idiot if you invest any time at all in such things. Papers are all that count. OSS software? You wrote something that hundreds of other researchers depend on for their daily work? Get lost, that professorship goes to someone else. Someone else who was a Real Man, and wrote Papers! Lots of them!

about a year ago



The resignation letter of the year - current academia described as it really is

muecksteiner muecksteiner writes  |  about 7 months ago

muecksteiner (102093) writes "Apparently, an EPFL PhD student recently resigned from his studies in disgust, and sent an open letter to all faculty to describe his motives for doing so. Even if the story of how the letter was written were to turn out to be not entirely true — the content certainly is. A depressing and unfortunately spot on accurate assessment of contemporary academia."
Link to Original Source


muecksteiner has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account