Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Retired SCOTUS Justice Wants To 'Fix' the Second Amendment

pegr Re:Militia, then vs now (1229 comments)

About $.12 a round, actually. 7.62x54R is cheaper than .22 LR. 50+ year old ammo works great!

(For the record, I've killed zero people with my gun. Come and take it.)

10 hours ago

Retired SCOTUS Justice Wants To 'Fix' the Second Amendment

pegr Re:Militia, then vs now (1229 comments)

You really have no idea. Go find a Mosin Nagant, an ancient Russian military rifle capable of hitting a target at over 200 yards with a high-power round for about $100.

Are expensive guns better than cheap ones? Sure! But there are cheap (and effective) guns for anyone who wants one.

(A clip is not a magazine...)

12 hours ago

Five-Year-Old Uncovers Xbox One Login Flaw

pegr Sucks to be a security professional... (196 comments)

Yeah, are you sick of that story of the Indian kid who got his CISSP at the age of 12? Well, here's a 5 year old with a published vulnerability!

about two weeks ago

One Person Successfully Removed From US No-Fly List

pegr Re:How is the no fly list legal? (286 comments)

Can someone explain how the government can impose penalties on a person without providing the evidence against them?


about three weeks ago

One Person Successfully Removed From US No-Fly List

pegr Fun fact (286 comments)

Judge William Alsup also ruled on the Oracle/Google case. The more you know! ;)

about three weeks ago

$30K Worth of Multimeters Must Be Destroyed Because They're Yellow

pegr Re:Copyrightable color - this is insane (653 comments)

Trademark, not copyright. But yes, trademarking a color seems excessive.

about a month ago

Ex-Head of Troubled Health Insurance Site May Sue, Citing 'Cover-Up'

pegr Inadequate experience? (162 comments)

In other news, Carolyn Lawson has apparently never worked a large IT development for government before.

about a month ago

Supreme Court Ruling Relaxes Warrant Requirements For Home Searches

pegr Re:Sure (500 comments)

Hey, it's an approach. Nothing works until it gets past a judge. It would have made for a better argument than the one he used (maybe).

Don't get me wrong. I'm not supporting a street thug. But law is a logic puzzle mixed with human irrationality. For instance, check out the genius who called me an idiot below. "That's not fair, so it can't be right!" Nope, doesn't work that way.

about 1 month ago

Supreme Court Ruling Relaxes Warrant Requirements For Home Searches

pegr Re:Sure (500 comments)

"Occupant means you live there as a legal resident. It does not include strangers and "persons that have no habitation rights of the residence they are in"."

Citation needed.

about 2 months ago

Supreme Court Ruling Relaxes Warrant Requirements For Home Searches

pegr Re:Sure (500 comments)

Actually, he could have protected himself with, "B*TCH! Get out of my house!" If she isn't on the lease, then she is staying as a guest. If the permission for a guest to stay is rescinded and she stays, she is now a trespasser. Trespassers cannot give consent to a search.

about 2 months ago

California Regulator Seeks To Shut Down 'Learn To Code' Bootcamps

pegr Re:Big $$$ (374 comments)

Maybe if the state of California read the First Amendment, there wouldn't be a need to fine code bootcamp operators.

(Hint: Commercial speech is still speech.)

about 3 months ago

Security Vendors Self-Censor Target Breach Details

pegr Re: Really? (115 comments)

Not here. Target's pos pos is homebrew.

about 3 months ago

Security Vendors Self-Censor Target Breach Details

pegr Useless effort (115 comments)

If by "don't want to compromise the investigation" they mean "don't want to let the crooks know what we know", they have already failed. Any action to remove material now is simply playing to politics.

Personally, I think the value of publishing the data is higher than not tipping your cards to crooks. They know what they left behind.

about 3 months ago

Man Jailed For Refusing To Reveal USB Password

pegr Re:Meltdown... (374 comments)

Proper forensics protocols state that you NEVER work with the original media, only copies.

about 3 months ago

Federal Judge Rules Chicago's Ban On Licensed Gun Dealers Unconstitutional

pegr Re:"News for nerds??" (934 comments)

Please enumerate for me the rights "granted" by the Bill of Rights.

(Hint: None. The Bill of Rights hinders actions of the government, not the people.)

about 3 months ago

Encrypted PIN Data Taken In Target Breach

pegr Re: 3des (213 comments)

Yes, the key is needed to encrypt, but the encrypted PIN block is already encrypted by the card embosser on behalf of the bank. If the merchant passes along the encrypted PIN block as sensitive authentication data to the processor for authorization, the merchant has no need to decrypt.

This, unfortunately, makes the encrypted PIN block more of a password than encrypted data. Cloning cards is still quite possible.

about 4 months ago

RSA Flatly Denies That It Weakened Crypto For NSA Money

pegr Re:It's a very sad day (291 comments)

Snowden has made no such claims. The claim originated from a leaked document. He provided the document to journalists. The document speaks for itself.

Is the document genuine? That is an entirely different question. I suspect that it is, though no one at the NSA will say. How do you confirm the authenticity of the document? Well, a simple initial approach may be to consider the accuracy of previous document releases. By that standard, it's genuine.

about 4 months ago



Trolling LinkedIn for spooks!

pegr pegr writes  |  about 10 months ago

pegr (46683) writes "Over at TechDirt, we learn that, apparently, the rules of OpSec do not apply to LinkedIn. Using your favorite NSA spying project codename, search LinkedIn for analysts with specific experience with that project! The bonus is that you may very well learn the codenames of more projects. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Oh, and if the person you find didn't share their contact list, LinkedIn will help you find more by showing you "those that viewed this profile also viewed these:" Say what you will regarding the recent NSA revelations, but shouldn't there be a policy with regard to exposing intelligence projects and personnel on public forums? Do we really need to make it this easy for counter-intel of opposing nations?"

Link to Original Source

Oracle versus Google: No patent infringement

pegr pegr writes  |  about 2 years ago

pegr (46683) writes "Straight from Groklaw, the jury finds that Google is not guilty of infringing Oracle's Java patents. When the judge declares that APIs are not copyrightable, Oracle will walk away with nothing. So much for your billions of dollars in damages, Larry!"
Link to Original Source

How many bits does it take to kill you?

pegr pegr writes  |  more than 4 years ago

pegr (46683) writes "Andrew "bunnie" Huang, Reverse Engineer, XBox hacker, and generally smart guy, muses over the H1N1/swine flu virus as only a reverse engineer can: "I now know how to modify the virus sequence to probably make it more deadly." Not that he would, of course. bunnie has consistantly made the esoteric available to us mere mortals, and his overview of the H1N1 virus is a fascinating read from a unique perspective."



0wning a Windows Network; A Practical Approach

pegr pegr writes  |  more than 6 years ago

Listen up, folks. I am about to share with you a practical way to own any corporate Windows network. Before you bitch, first let me tell you that I won't tell you anything you don't already know or is anything other than obvious. That said, this approach works 85-90% of the time. It is time tested. It works. I've done it many times. And if you try this outside of legitimate network vulnerability testing, I hope you go to prison for a long time. That said, on with the show...

First, the bigger the Windows network, the higher likelihood of success. You'll understand why in a moment.

Any company with greater than 100 workstations uses workstation images to deploy new machines. It's a fact of life. The trouble is, the machines are a bit too similar. No one thinks about the local Administrator account. Yes, the local admin account has the same password for every machine. This is the key. Sure, the local admin account password may change when they change the image. But more times than not, many/most/all local admin passwords will be the same.

Get access to a workstation. If you're a consultant, tell them you need one before you show up. That way, a nice fresh workstation will be waiting for you when you get there. If not, wait until everyone goes home and help yourself to one (or more). No matter. Get your hands on at least one.

Did you guess step two? Dump the hashes and crack them. If you're lucky, you'll have LANMAN hashes. If not, you'll have NT hashes. LM hashes fall faster than SCO's stock price. NT hashes can be cracked, but you better be prepared. Rainbow tables work for NT hashes too. Maybe you'll get lucky. Maybe you'll have a few hundred gigs of NT hash Rainbow tables. Whatever. Chances are good you'll have LANMAN hashes. (For you auditors out there, that's finding number two. Number one was common passwords for local Admin accounts.)

Step three is to see how many machines you can access with your new local admin password. Look up how to attach to other machines from the command line. Write a few batch files. You can test your newly stolen credentials against a couple of hundred machines in a few hours.

Find your Windows admin users. They may be smart enough to change the local admin passwords. With a big enough comapny, they won't all be smart enough. Keep plugging and keep good notes.

Review the file systems of the machines you can access. There may be some good nuggets inside. Maybe you'll find router passwords, maybe you'll find love letters to the admin's mistress. It's all valuable. (Keep good notes.)

When you find a Windows admin's workstation, bug it. You want to record all authentication sessions. There are many good keystroke loggers out there. If your paranoid, don't use them. Write your own.

Retrieve your Domain Admin creds and have fun. Make a new domain admin account. Call it something that fits in with the present members of the domain admin group. If the group is large (finding number four for you auditors), just make an account that looks natural. If not, make one that mimics another legit account. Many admins have extra accounts for whatever reason. If you see an account "bwilson", try "bwilson2". The admins will naturally think it belongs to Bill. Why did Bill make another account? Believe me, no one will ask him.


Change your mac address for each session. Better yet, change your network port.

Use another workstation you already own. Use an encrypted volume for your activities. Have the volume close after ten minutes of inactivity.

Steal the mac address of a lonely network printer. Use the printer's network jack too. Printers don't use 802.11x.

Use a wireless bridge. If they can't find you connected to a port, they can't find you.

Variations on a theme:

Tell the admin about the common local admin passwords. Chances are, he will make a job to run once a month to change all the local admin passwords. If the local admin passwords weren't all the same before, they are now. Be sure to thank him for making the vulnerability even bigger than it was before. (Hey Rob-The-Windows-Security-Guru: That one's for you, dumbass!)

Get stuck on a NetWare network? Consider yourself lucky. NetWare caches NDS credentials down to the local machine as a local user by default. Crack the local and you have NDS creds. Even if the NDS account is deleted, the local account stays, and may get you access to any machine the NDS user accessed when the account was active. I've accessed local workstations with two year old expired NDS accounts. Thanks Novell! (See what happens when you make interoperability with Microsoft a higher concern than security? With moves like that, you deserve to have Bill Gates eat your lunch.)

I will update this post whenever I feel like it, which may be never. If you have something to say about it, feel free.




pegr pegr writes  |  more than 6 years ago

Let's see if we can game the journal system by posting a stub with a date/time marker, then editing it to reflect something prophetical after the fact. This is my stub. Stay tuned!

Mandatory prophetical placeholder... SCO will lose...

The original post is dated September 9, 2007. This edit (November 20, 2007) should reset that date. Let's see what happens... Hey! No date change! Now what can I predict after the fact? I'll have to wait for something big, then edit this post to reflect my uncanny ability to predict the future... This might be fun!

If anyone out there wantes to start a thread under this post to get in on the prediction (to be (n|g)amed later), now's your chance!


Poor man's Echelon

pegr pegr writes  |  more than 6 years ago

In considering Echelon, the world-wide signals intelligence program supposedly capable of recording, transcribing, and analyzing most any voice communication anywhere, I was intrigued by the technology it would take to do it. Better yet, can I make my own Echelon system? The answer is truly surprising, not in how simple it is to do, but in how utterly cheap it is, at least on a small scale.

First, we need a method to record telephone conversations. Since the conversations are to be processed by a computer, it makes sense to capture them with a PC at the beginning. Let's start with an interface device made to record phone calls to a standard cassette tape recorder. Here's one at everyone's "favorite" electronics store, Radio Shack. RS has been selling this kind of device for 30 years. It simply plugs into a phone line and toggles the remote switch on when a conversation is present. We don't care about the remote switch, we just want a tap that will convert a phone signal into something we can use with the microphone input on a sound card. This device is about $27 if you're too lazy to a) shop, or b) make your own.

Next, we need a bit of smarts on the PC side. While I'm a Linux user, I'll be using a Windows machine for this project because of the availability of off-the-shelf software components. What we need is a simple program that monitors the sound card microphone input, and when a voice signal is present, record the input to a file. When the input is no longer present, close the file and continue to monitor the input.

Well, it turns out there is just the utility to do this. Try this utility. This little program does exactly what I described.

So what do we have now? Well, we now have a system that will monitor a single phone line and record any phone conversations on that line to a wav file. The file name is encoded with the date/time the conversation took place. It even captures the DTMF of outgoing calls. Wow, our little Echelon system is coming together!

What to do now? Well, there are a few options. One is to simply have another script email any new files that appear in the recordings directory to you. I'm thinking a bit bigger, however. How about filtering the files through a voice/text converter, such as Naturally Speaking? Then, store away the transcription (along with the original recording) in a DB, and index by key words? In reviewing the features list of Naturally Speaking, the Preferred Edition (list for $199) has a feature that monitors a directory and auto-converts any new sound files that appear in it. Perfect! A complete batched system is within sight!

I haven't done this yet, but I can see no reason why you couldn't. If I can defeat my lack of organizational inertia (read lazyness), I'll update this post and let you know how it works!

Notice: In most states, you are only permitted to record phone conversations you are a participant in. Some states don't even let you do that. If you were to make a system like this and have it record phone conversations you are not a party to, you would very likely violate state and/or federal law. Yes, I understand the contradiction. No, I don't like it either.

So why would I make such a system if using it is illegal? It's more of an exercise to demonstrate that, whatever your take on government surveillance, phone tapping, key word searching, etc., you can remove from the argument whether or not they can do it. They positively and absolutely CAN, because I can.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Sign up for Slashdot Newsletters
Create a Slashdot Account