Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Industry-Based ToDo Alliance Wants To Guide FOSS Development

pem Y'all are looking at this wrong (54 comments)

This is just a recruiting tool.

Self-selecting, too.

Dudes and gals who get their panties in a bunch about corporations "controlling" open source will steer clear, while people passionate about open source and looking for an employer might take a closer look.

2 days ago

3 Recent Flights Make Unscheduled Landings, After Disputes Over Knee Room

pem Re:Anthropometrics (813 comments)

Maybe. If I'm in front and want to lean back a little, and feel some resistance, I'll just say "excuse me", pull forward as far as I can, and then jam it back hard and fast enough to fuck up your kneecap.

about two weeks ago

In Maryland, a Soviet-Style Punishment For a Novelist

pem Re:There might be more to this story (441 comments)

I'll reiterate my main point, and then you can keep arguing if you want.

From what I read, several national, well-respected print and web publications have reached out to the original sheriff for clarification, and he has said squat.

If we misunderstand what he's saying, it's his own damn fault.

about two weeks ago

Apple Denies Systems Breach In Photo Leak

pem I don't get it (311 comments)

Good security doesn't depend on protocol secrecy.

How the heck does it matter if Apple works with elcomsoft or not? If reverse-engineering a protocol is all it takes to jeapordize user's data, it's security-by-obscurity in the best case.

about two weeks ago

In Maryland, a Soviet-Style Punishment For a Novelist

pem Re:There might be more to this story (441 comments)

How can we be sure that really is what caught their attention? Can we be sure that this isn't just WBOC16 playing up the only sliver of fact they have?

You're making my point for me. The article didn't say that the sheriff confirmed the answer to a question; it said the sheriff volunteered this information. It appears that most of what we know from this sheriff has to do with the books. Why would he have said anything about them if they weren't perceived to be relevant to the investigation?

There is more information at the Atlantic article now; but it all came from a sheriff in a different county -- this particular sheriff apparently realized he fucked up, and now appears to be maintaining radio silence.

about two weeks ago

In Maryland, a Soviet-Style Punishment For a Novelist

pem Re:There might be more to this story (441 comments)


Early last week the school board was alerted that one of its eighth grade language arts teachers at Mace's Lane Middle School had several aliases. Police said that under those names, he wrote two fictional books about the largest school shooting in the country's history set in the future. Now, Patrick McLaw is placed on leave.

Dr. K.S. Voltaer is better known by some in Dorchester County as Patrick McLaw, or even Patrick Beale. Not only was he a teacher at Mace's Lane Middle School in Cambridge, but according to Dorchester Sheriff James Phillips, McLaw is also the author of two books: "The Insurrectionist" and its sequel, "Lillith's Heir."


OK, WTF do (did) the books have to do with it? It's not McLaw's fault or my fault that I think the police might have arrested him over the books -- it's obviously the police's fault I think that. And it's also their fault that they have a lot of credibility to recover, and saying that it's not about the books rings hollow.

Also, note the careful phrasing -- it didn't start or end with the books, and the books are not a focus now. So, at one point they were obviously the focus, and merited enough focus to be the only thing that was disclosed to the news organizations.

about two weeks ago

In Maryland, a Soviet-Style Punishment For a Novelist

pem Re:There might be more to this story (441 comments)

Since all the authorities have apparently chosen to share is that he had the temerity to write scary fiction while teaching, we should assume that's what happened until they tell us otherwise.

It's not a bad thing that this assumption may be completely unfair to the authorities, because we should always be pressuring them to be more transparent.

about two weeks ago

Ask Slashdot: What To Do About Repeated Internet Overbilling?

pem Re: AT&T DSL/Uverse Data Limits (355 comments)

Err, that is, mod up the AC parent which shows that the math is wrong, and netflix 24x7 is 972 GIGABYTES per month.

about three weeks ago

Larry Rosen: A Case Study In Understanding (and Enforcing) the GPL

pem Re:Morality vs The Law (191 comments)

The thing you have to remember is this:

The code in question is dual-licensed.

The code is not produced by a charity; it is produced by a business. From the perspective of a business, the GPL is a marketing tool -- a great marketing tool. "Here's the source; try it out! Talk to others who are using it! Just contact us if you want to merge it with your proprietary code and make money!"

Any business can use the GPL this way, and many have. Just because a business uses the GPL does not mean that their politics align with the FSF.

about a month ago

Parallax Completes Open Hardware Vision With Open Source CPU

pem Re:Open FPGA? (136 comments)

Actual software developers write in C, not Ada.

Likewise, it's my understanding that most digital hardware is written in Verilog, not VHDL.

It's a bit different in the FPGA world, and in Europe, but AFAIK, in US chip development, Verilog reigns supreme.

about a month ago

The New 501(c)(3) and the Future of Open Source In the US

pem Re:Didn't use a lawyer? (228 comments)

You don't absolutely need a lawyer, but you do have to read the docs carefully and structure your answers carefully to give them what they need. If you are incapable of this, then, yes, you should get a lawyer.

I say this as one who just last year successfully set up a 501(c)3 for a community band, receiving a favorable determination letter, with no request for follow-up, in under 4 calendar months (which included the short government shutdown).

Yes, there is precedent and there are already lots of community bands, but you could say the same thing about software. And it was obvious from reading all the IRS material that it would be quite easy to screw up even a community band application. If I were doing a software 501(c)3, I think I would have been even more careful to stress the things that the IRS was looking for, and might have even told the other board members that we should amend the bylaws and/or do a few other things (like hold educational events or write scholarly treatises or whatever) before submitting the application.

FWIW, I completely disagree with all the people saying "well, duh, it should be a non-profit" because they distribute free software. A lot of for-profit companies distribute free software, too, and the IRS deals with innumerable shysters who try to turn their business into non-profits in all fields of endeavor.

Although, as I said, you do not need to be a lawyer to get through the process, if I had received a request for more information from the IRS for more information, I would have viewed that as a huge red flag that I was on the verge of fucking it up, and would have spent a few hundred dollars on an attorney at that point to try to salvage the $400 that I had to give the IRS for the application.

But obviously, that wasn't the mindset of the people at yorba. From the yorba foundation blog post:

Some [questions] were odd: "Will any of your directors or employees reside at your facility [i.e. our office]?"

The fact that they found this question odd is ample evidence that they did not try to get into the mindset of the IRS before sending the initial application, and the fact that they apparently still find it odd means that they failed to take the request for more information seriously enough and still weren't trying to get inside the IRS's thinking. Given that, it's not surprising, not news, not corporatism, not david-v-goliath, and certainly not the end of the world for free software as we know it that this particular application was rejected.

about 3 months ago

Are US Hybrid Sales Peaking Already?

pem I can't buy one (377 comments)

I've been waiting for a new Mitsubishi i-MiEV for over two months.

Are they peaking because nobody wants them, or because nobody wants to make them?

about 3 months ago

Ask Slashdot: Re-Learning How To Interview As a Developer?

pem Listen (218 comments)

Too often, people overcommunicate.

Listen and watch. If you are answering the question you thought they asked, instead of the question they thought they asked, they will probably be somewhat annoyed.

Try to pick up on that, and either figure out what they were asking, or ask for clarification. Let them get in a few words, too.

about 6 months ago

OASIS Approves OData 4.0 Standards For an Open, Programmable Web

pem Re:JSON Sucks (68 comments)

I thought it was clear from the context that readability/writability meant BY A HUMAN, not BY A PROGRAM.

But I guess I suck at that myself, since we're obviously not communicating properly.

Obviously there are libraries in all sorts of languages to read/write both.

about 6 months ago

OASIS Approves OData 4.0 Standards For an Open, Programmable Web

pem Re:JSON Sucks (68 comments)

If the metric is readability without special tools, why stop there?

Neither JSON nor XML is easily writable without special tools.

YAML attempts to be writable, but the grammar and parser are huge and slow.

RSON is a superset of JSON that is eminently readable/writable, and much simpler than YAML, allowing, for example, for human-maintained configuration files.

The reference Python parser operates about as fast as the unaccelerated Python library pure JSON parser.

about 6 months ago

Google Blocking Asus's Android-Windows "Duet"?

pem Embrace, extend, extinguish (194 comments)

Microsoft is looking for a new revenue stream -- they would be the only software vendor taking money from Asus for this hybrid, and then it would be in their interest to make the MS part indispensible, and the Android part -- not so much.

Google understands perfectly what Microsoft is up to. Why is it evil for them to nip it in the bud?

Who even knows if Asus really wants to do this? They are not going to voice a negative opinion because they also sell Windows laptops.

And as others have pointed out, Asus is free to do this in any case -- they just can't have access to google services. Microsoft should be up for this; after all, if Amazon has the technical chops to run a third-party app store, surely Microsoft... oh, wait.

about 6 months ago

Customer: Dell Denies Speaker Repair Under Warranty, Blames VLC

pem Re:Email the company's lawyer (526 comments)

The objective isn't to bring a lawsuit, it's to get your problem resolved

Exactly. Or it should be. One of my friends has a lot of bitterness towards his brother (and he's 54 and his brother is around 60). He simultaneously wants to fuck with his brother and never have to deal with him/think about him again. I keep telling him that it's one or the other...

In any case, before you send any correspondence, whether by post or email, you should be perfectly clear about your objectives, and they should be something that at least one other person besides you thinks is reasonable.

about 7 months ago

Customer: Dell Denies Speaker Repair Under Warranty, Blames VLC

pem Re:Email the company's lawyer (526 comments)

"Some idiots will say to email the CEO, but if you're lucky, that will just get down to the lawyer, and the lawyer will already be miffed because you've piled more work on him from above. Better to go straight to the lawyer."

You think the CEO reads anything like a publicly-accessible email account? It all goes to "the right department" exclusively via some email-reading minion. You think emailing the CEO of Dell about a laptop return is going to make them go yell at a lawyer?

Apparent reading comprehension fail. I said to email the lawyer because if you email the CEO, it will only get to the lawyer if you're lucky.

Email the company at head office and it will end up at the person they deem right to deal with it. If you yell a lot it might go to their line manager. It won't get close to an expensive lawyer (or even legal department) until you get a court order at the very least.

The plural of anecdote is not data, but in my 10-15 experiences (probably closer to 30 if you count the experiences of the people I have individually counselled on how to deal with obstreperous customer service), it is extremely easy to get a lawyer's attention if you go about it correctly.

Welcome to the world of modern customer service, where "the boss" is the guy who was good at answering the phones last month, and you can never get hold of him anyway.

Right. Which is why you spend a bit of time doing that, document it well, and then go to the lawyer. Again, you are not trying to convince the lawyer that you are in the right. You are trying to convince the lawyer that you will be able to convince a judge or jury that you are in the right. Completely different things.

As someone who - in the past few months - has complained to Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (who demanded tax returns going back 6 years despite me not being required to file them any more), had their car insurance settle out of court after cancelling my contract - without notice - in breach of contract (and actually a shed-load of other laws), and have several companies referred to Trading Standards (some of which dragged on for months), I can tell you that not until there's a real, genuine threat of a lawsuit (i.e. a court paper coming through the post) will anyone even CLOSE to a legal professional get involved.

And I'm telling you that, in my considerable experience, you can convince them that (a) you are capable of managing the lawsuit; and (b) you are perfectly willing to do so -- without actually directly threatening.

The first guy is always useless. Their boss is usually useless. But in any organisation of a decent size, there are dozens of layers in between. If you're really lucky, you'll get a letter signed "on behalf of" (P.P.) a qualified lawyer by his legal secretary who signs a pile of similar papers every day, from those people who bother to complain enough that they probably have a genuine cause but it's just not worth chasing to court.

I have always either (a) gotten communication from the lawyer; or (b) just had the right thing happen (for example, several times I got no response, but a full refund on a credit card. Obviously YMMV.

People do not know how to complain.

And I'm trying to rectify that. You're helping to make my point for me. I have had a dozen positive outcomes after following the approach I outlined.

Of course, you address your letter to Head Office but if you think for a second that a corporate lawyer does more than flick the paper onto a pile for some underling to sort out, until an actual court-stamped paper comes to them, then you're sadly mistaken.

I didn't say to address a letter to "Head Office." I said to address it to a lawyer. The lawyer the company says is in charge of its legal stuff. An actual living, breathing, human being, who probably has some power and who also actually probably understands the risk/reward scenario you are presenting.

And, fuck email. In the UK - at least, I assume the US is similar - every company has to provide a postal address of their head office on demand. It's a legal requirement (and I've got a company fined for failing to do just that while I was complaining about something else).

But most lawyers have and use emails.

Emails go to an underling that sits in front of an inbox and spam folder all day. Letters are verifiable proof-of-receipt and instantly admissible in court and undeniable if you send by a recorded delivery.

If you actually hit the inbox of the lawyer, even if it's their underling sorting through the inbox, you have almost certainly given them notice. You are right that you might not be able to prove they received it, which is why you should end the email with the equivalent of "please respond so I don't have to send you a letter." That shows a knowledge of the process and (if you phrase the rest of the email properly) should also show a willingness to follow through. Seriously, for whatever reason your mileage differs from mine, I can tell you that email has worked for me when dealing with CompUSA (RIP), Fry's, T-Mobile, AT&T, and Wells Fargo, for a start. In all cases, my issue was resolved extremely quickly after the initial communication with the lawyer. In most cases it was all by email; in a few cases they actually telephoned me.

They also get more attention because every idiot can send an email to complaints@ or headoffice@ but not every idiot will bother to send you a letter stating in black and white that you are wrong and these are the facts as they know them.

So, are you agreeing with me, or did you have a reading comprension fail? I advocated against sending an email to a generic address.

And you have to READ THE DAMN THINGS. Emails you can scan for keywords and auto-reply from a standard template . Letters some git has to type up a reply to, print it out, address it and send it back to you.

Apparently emails are just like slashdot comments.

People just don't know how to complain any more.

Obviously, we disagree on the best method. But mine works for me, and is a lot less effort and stress all around than what you appear to be advocating.

about 7 months ago



The GNU operating system is 25!

pem pem writes  |  about 6 years ago

pem (1013437) writes "According to latest info at, the "GNU operating system" is now 25 years old. That's gNews to me — I had no idea there was such a thing. Does it run on the Intel 8080, or use the new Z80 mnemonics?"


pem has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>