Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Sand-Based Anode Triples Lithium-Ion Battery Performance

rally2xs Re:Let me guess...? (60 comments)

And then it'll be too expensive or too heavy or too bulky or too whatever to use in electric cars, which is where we really need it.

And its really 20 years away, don'tcha know?

about two weeks ago
top

Sand-Based Anode Triples Lithium-Ion Battery Performance

rally2xs Again (60 comments)

Yet another story about a 3X or 10X or whateverX improvement on Li-Ion batteries that will never, ever get out of the lab. or if it does, will be too delicate or too slow or too expensive or too whatever to use in electric cars.

If we ever do get the electric car, then we only have to start work on the 86 or so nuke power plants of the same size as the one at Palo Verde, Az, our largest, in order to completely replace petroleum and leave the oil in the ground. Of course, the sad thing there is going back to propellers, connected to electric motors, 'cuz there's no electric substituted for a jet engine.

But of course we can't build even 1 nuke because of the envirowackos, so until they get the H out of the way, we might as well continue drilling...

about two weeks ago
top

No Shortage In Tech Workers, Advocacy Groups Say

rally2xs Wanna Fix It? (401 comments)

Wanna fix it? Pass the Fair Tax. The Fair Tax eliminates the income taxes and the IRS, both good things, but also institutes a sales tax on new retail items and services for sale. It has a mechanism called the "prebate" that pays each citizen enough money to pay the Fair Tax on the basic living expenses of someone making money at the poverty level. Every citizen from your favorite street person all the way up to Bill Gates gets this prebate.

Significantly, non-citizens, such as these foreigners working here, DO NOT get the prebate. That means that they will not get the monthly payment from the gov't to defray the cost of the Fair Tax for spending up to the poverty level. That means that if they want to send our dollars back to the old country, they're going to have to do it without help from us. That will make them demand more $$$ from employers here, and make the playing field a bit more level. No more taking American jobs just because you're sole claim to fame is being willing to work for peanuts.

about three weeks ago
top

Oklahoma's Earthquakes Linked To Fracking

rally2xs Re:Okay, so this has what to do with fracking then (154 comments)

Such policies have raised 250,000,000 people out of poverty in India and 400,000,000 people out of poverty in China. Yes, they do work. They're just not working here because they've been taxed and regulated out of the country.

Liberalism is the ideology of envy, resentment, hatred, and self hate - which you demonstrate by your "asshat company's pursuit of profits" phrase. In reality, that pursuit of profits is repeated on a personal level for every one of us. But with the company operating nearby, many local people's pursuit of profits, to get or keep themselves out of poverty, works better than if the company is NOT nearby.

They're likely to start fracking in this area. I say bring it on. If there's a minor earthquake and something cracks or moves, or maybe one of my trophies falls off a shelf and breaks, well, that's what I have insurance for...

about three weeks ago
top

Oklahoma's Earthquakes Linked To Fracking

rally2xs Re:Ground water pollution. (154 comments)

The "ground water contamination" is, if you look at the article, from METHANE, where some water wells have had methane for decades. Its not a big deal, you can drink water with methane in it, and you only need a simple construction to vent off the dissolved gas so that it doesn't accumulate in the house and blow something up.

Methane in drinking water occurs naturally, and as a result of coal mining operations, and sometimes any sort of drilling, with or without fracking. The whole thing is yet another "Lets tear America down" pack of lies, and the sooner we buck up and quit being scared of the boogey men that are peddling this nonsense, the better off we'll all be.

about three weeks ago
top

Oklahoma's Earthquakes Linked To Fracking

rally2xs Re: Ground water pollution. (154 comments)

You got it - these people that attack any economic activity at all are enemies of the country. Hang 'em from the lamp posts, I say. They will all have us crawling around with sub-poverty income if we let them make us afraid of absolutely everything that involves turning a wrench or drilling a hole...

about three weeks ago
top

Oklahoma's Earthquakes Linked To Fracking

rally2xs Re:Okay, so this has what to do with fracking then (154 comments)

The politics of jealousy once again, as someone is upset that a CEO somewhere is getting >1M in salary, but fail to realize that the "industry profits" go to making more and more industry, which employs more and more people, sometimes in some fairly good jobs if there's competition locally to make labor scarce. Go to the Bakken and get a job in the oil fields, and make 6 figures while making an oil drilling rig go or driving a truck. "Industry profits', and only industry profits can bring back prosperity to America. The gov't can't do it, other than getting the H out of the way of industry so that THEY can do it. The gov't doesn't create wealth, industry does that. There's only 3 ways of creating wealth - wealth being something tangible that you didn't have before - and they are mining, manufacturing, and agriculture. Drilling is mining. We should be trying to get MORE of these 3 things into the USA, not less. And if there's a price to pay, then get on with it and build your buildings to withstand the "minor" earthquakes that sometimes occur, and buy insurance.

about three weeks ago
top

Oklahoma's Earthquakes Linked To Fracking

rally2xs C'mon... Lets Attack America Some More... (154 comments)

Fracking causes "minor" earthquakes, quarrying produces local ground shaking, and you're getting jobs and economic prosperity back in return. Suck it up, cupcake, or otherwise they'll start putting up a bunch of regulations that will stop the whole thing, and then we can all go to the poor house together 'cuz there won't be ANYTHING in the country that someone can't yowl about and get stopped.

Poverty causes death, plain and simple. Kill another industry, and you're killing people, plain and simple. Right now, 1/6th of the USA struggles with hunger. Some don't survive it, 'cuz if they don't starve to death, then they get sick, can't afford doctors, and die that way. Good grief, this is supposed to be the "Land of Plenty" but we've driven jobs out of the country with income taxes that make industry unprofitable and now we want to regulate the rest of the industry that can't be shipped to China into inactivity as well.

Starve, then. I've got mine - retired with a lifetime $$$ stream, but you're making the USA a worse place to live if you go around making everything more expensive or impossible to do inside our borders.

about three weeks ago
top

New Chemical Process Could Make Ammonia a Practical Car Fuel

rally2xs Re:I see a problem here... (380 comments)

I have a hobby that requires travel around the USA, and I've finally sworn off airplane travel due to gov't abuses such as x-raying passengers and groping passengers. They can all go take a flying F, I'm driving... That puts miles on the car. The rest of the year will see trips from Virginia to Indianapolis, La Crosse, Chattanooga, and a 3-week trip visiting Los Angeles, then Kansas, then Tucson. Lots of driving. Love driving long distances, too. Won the 1987 1-Lap of America, 9,000 miles in 10 days. That was awesome.

about a month ago
top

New Chemical Process Could Make Ammonia a Practical Car Fuel

rally2xs Re:I see a problem here... (380 comments)

"I get around" - The Beach Boys

about a month ago
top

New Chemical Process Could Make Ammonia a Practical Car Fuel

rally2xs Re:I see a problem here... (380 comments)

Its a big country. We end up driving 100's of 1000's of miles in a relatively short time. I've owned my 2012 Subaru WRX for about 27 months. Its got 87,000 miles on it. It burns premium, and premium is pricey at around $3.75 / gallon. Yeah, that's not much compared to Europe, but Europe is smaller than the USA and their compactness also allows for cheaper public transport so they don't have to drive so much. Passenger railways can actually make money there, whereas they mostly lose money here unless you're talking about the Northeast Corridor and some of California. Rocketing across the great plains where population density is extremely low means no riders wish to get on or off there, so a train making that trip will probably not be able to get enough money in fares to operate.

about a month ago
top

New Chemical Process Could Make Ammonia a Practical Car Fuel

rally2xs Re:I see a problem here... (380 comments)

CO2 isn't a pollutant. It is a made-up scarecrow by the left who want to use the issue to acquire political power.

about a month ago
top

New Chemical Process Could Make Ammonia a Practical Car Fuel

rally2xs Re:waste of time (380 comments)

Some numbers for the green power electric transportation dreamers:

14 million barrels of petroleum per day of transportation petroleum. Each barrel has 5.8 million BTUs of energy. Multiplying, that is 81.2 million million BTUs. Internal combustion engines are about 25% efficient, so the USA requires energy of "only" 20.3 million million BTUs per day. Since electric motors as used in electric cars are about 90% efficient, that means we require 22.5 million million BTUs per day. But battery charging is also about 90% efficient, so we then need 25 million million BTUs per day. Then, unless we're charging the batteries right at the power plant, we have to figure in the 93% efficiency of the power grid, so we really need 26.9 million million BTUs per day. There are 3413 BTUs per KwH as a conversion factor, so we need 7.88 billion KwH per day. Since there are 24 hours in a day, we need a generating capacity of 328,000 megawatts. The Palo Verde nuclear plant in Arizona can generate at a rate of 3810 megawatts. Dividing, we find that we need about 86 new nuclear power generating plants the size of our largest one to power US transportation completely and completely green.

Wind? Biggest wind machine so far is 8 megawatts, so we'd need 41,000 of them, but probably, for a fudge factor for the times that the wind doesn't blow sufficiently for 8 megawatts, we'd probably want maybe 4 times that many, or 164,000 really big wind turbines. There are 3,794,083 square miles in all of the USA so there would be a density of 0.043 wind turbines per square mile, but of course not all areas have wind or can be built (mountains), so maybe we'd get to needing 1 square mile per turbine. Doable, but how much would it cost? Read on internet 1.6 - 2.2 million per megawatt, so the large 8 megawatt turbine would be $17.6 million on the high end, and 164,000 of them would be $2.88 trillion. Build 'em out over 50 years or so and yeah, that's "only" 57.7 billion dollars per year. Chicken feed for a gov't that is already broke, eh? In contrast, the Palo Verde Nuke plant cost $5.9 billion, so 86 of 'em would cost $507.4 billion - lots less than $2.88 trillion for wind.

Solar only produces during the daytime. Not going to try to calc that.

about a month ago
top

George Lucas Selects Chicago For the Star Wars Museum

rally2xs Chicago (98 comments)

Chicago - gave us our first truly anti-American President.

about 1 month ago
top

Intel Wants To Computerize Your Car

rally2xs Re:autopilot software / hardware has lot's testing (191 comments)

Yeah, and wait 'til I open up with a 1000 watt mobile radio that is my ham radio station, right beside the self-driving car, that is then jammed by the high power RF field and does an immediate right turn over the cliff and into the river below. Enjoy your self-driving car, and take swimming lessons.

about 2 months ago
top

Intel Wants To Computerize Your Car

rally2xs My Cars... (191 comments)

...are already computerized. The old '98 Jeep has a "check engine" light that has been on for about 6 years that says the oxygen sensor is out, but that was replaced 3 times and the light still keeps coming back on. Obviously, its the frappin' engine computer. No, I'm not replacing a computer, prolly $1200 - dunno, haven't looked - when I can just ignore the frappin' light.

The other car has had numerous failures connected to the computer, from the bad brake light switch that caused a "check engine" light that also disables the cruise control, and other failures that have also disabled the cruise control. The car has a "hill holder" function to prevent rollback and a stability control function that prevents skids which neither work because a "steering wheel angle sensor" is "throwing codes" and disabling those 2 functions. It doesn't disable the cruise control, so I can ignore it, although two warning lights on the dash are on permanently now, because I'm not spending $700 to have the steering column totally torn apart to replace that sensor (that may be a bad computer anyway, just like the Jeep), when I know how to do both of those functions all by myself anyway.

Self-driving car? They better have 3 computers in a "voting" arrangement and prohibit maintenance to them by anyone not having a college electrical engineering degree. These things may kill more than they save if you get Billy-Bob under the hood and stripping wires and putting them back together with black plastic electrical tape which will weather and fall off and then that wire shorts...

about 2 months ago
top

Google To Close Its American Moto X Factory

rally2xs Re:remove Health Care from jobs and then labor cos (154 comments)

I don't think you've read and understood the Fair Tax. No poor person pays even a penny of Fair Tax. I'm right in the middle of the middle class, and would save $2K a year with the Fair Tax. Your taxes would probably be lower too.

about 2 months ago
top

Google To Close Its American Moto X Factory

rally2xs Re:High labor cost in US, why ? (154 comments)

No, the income tax doesn't really hurt the top guys all that much, they can take care of themselves. But, it _does_ hurt the businesses. The businesses are forced to raise the prices for their goods and services to pay the taxes on their operations, and they _don't_ get that money by diminishing in any way the salaries of the top guys.

The DO raise the prices of their products, and the DO lower the pay of their workers, and they DO reduce the payout of the dividends on their stocks. The money that the public would have saved and the money the employees would have earned and the dividends that the investors would have enjoyed instead is stolen by the US Gov't.

I say stolen because it is taken by force by people to whom it does not belong. I've come to the conclusion, after a lifetime of attempting to rationalize it, that income taxes are purely and simply stealing. I can find no good reason to excuse the gov't from that charge. The gov't doesn't have the right to everyone's property. It has the power to take it, but not the right. No kidding, I always used to wonder about that as soon as I heard about it in grade school, "What gives them the right?" Well, they don't have the right, simply the power.

You should take a much closer look at the Fair Tax. The FT is the only tax so far proposed that is truly progressive. The income taxes aren't - Warren Buffet ends up paying 14%, and his secretary pays, what was it, 18%? What's progressive about that? The payroll taxes supporting social security and Medicare cease being collected at the point that the person makes about $118K, but are collected from the 1st dollar that a poor person makes. A poor person that makes $12K / yr ends up sending 15.3% of that to Washington, DC.

In contrast, the FT "prebates" each citizen with the amount of $$$ that they would need to pay the FT on poverty level spending. That is, if one is single, and the poverty level is $12K, that person would receive 23% of $12,000 each year to pay the FT on all the things he would buy up to the poverty level. So, that person will get $2,760 each year, divided up into 12 equal monthly payments. It doesn't matter whether that person is a single person that is as rich as Bill Gates, or your favorite street person panhandling on a street corner, he will get that prebate.

Due to the prebate, no person effectively pays the Fair Tax. When he buys something, he reaches into the pocket with the money he earned or panhandled or whatever, and pays the price of the item he's buying, and then reaches into the pocket that has the money he received from the gov't as a prebate and pays the Fair Tax. That pocket will continue to provide money to pay the Fair Tax all the way up until he spends his last dollar that is at the poverty level for the month. Then, the prebate runs out and the person has to start paying the Fair Tax on remaining items he buys for the month, until his next prebate check comes the following month. Of course, if he's making poverty level wages, he is not capable of spending more than the poverty level, and so NEVER pays the Fair Tax himself.

And I took a look at the Flat Tax once upon a time and discovered that while it purports to give a break to people for the first $X dollars they make, which I think was somewhere around $18K, it DOES NOT repeal the payroll taxes. Therefore it charges its 17% flat tax rate to _AND_ the 15.3% payroll taxes to the person starting at $18K (or whatever the exemption is, I forget) and so the middle class pays 32.3% tax to the gov't, while the payroll tax stops taxing the rich at around $118K, so the rich making much, much higher than $118K end up being taxed very close to 17% Flat Tax for their entire earnings. Poor: 15.3% Middle Class: 32.3% Rich: 17% plus a fraction. Progressive? Nope. Only the Fair Tax is progressive.

And there are side benefits to the Fair Tax such as not having to spend $13B on the IRS, since the states collect the monies, and we can even go green by not cutting down 300,000 trees every year to print IRS tax forms.

Oh, where does the tax burden really fall if the Fair Tax is enacted. It gets spread around, to be sure, but it falls probably most heavily on the rich. That is because of their insatiable desire for the toys of the rich. We buy a Chevy, they buy a Maserati. If you look around the net, you can find that John and Teresa Kerry haul down about $5M between them, and pay about $1.8M in income taxes. But, they bought a $70M yacht. Fair Tax on a $70M yacht would have sent $21M to the US Treasury. It would, in contrast, take John and Teresa about 12 years to send that much money to the US Treasury via the income taxes. And then of course there's the criminals that don't pay income taxes at all, but would pay the Fair Tax when they build the mansion overlooking the city they are destroying via their criminal enterprises, and the moonlighters that work a 40 hour job, then drive taxi for 50 more hours and never whisper about the income from driving, and the illegal aliens that don't pay squat, or in some cases file fraudulent income tax returns claiming 16 kids that don't exist in order to get credits for them that result in even more money being "returned" to them from the US Treasury than they ever paid into the Treasury from any withholding they may have encountered, and even foreign tourists get to contribute when they visit and buy souveniers, or expensive airline tickets and motel stays.

And the bottom line is that, since 22% of the price of things built in the USA goes to pay income taxes, relief from that burden will cause the prices of American-built products to fall. That's what we want, so that we can sell more competitively to the American People as well as to those on the other end of an export shipment. We are incredible boneheads to tax our businesses and allow all that embedded tax to hurt the US businesses that are trying to export. While not all 22% of the income tax expense of manufacturing in the USA can be recovered, since some of the things costing US businesses money are things like their worker's personal income tax that raised the prices of American manufacturing, things like our highest-in-the-world corporate income taxes will be recovered. The best guess is that prices of US products would fall by 11% - 18%. If prices of a Jeep Cherokee built in Toledo, Ohio would fall from $35K to 11% less $31,150, that would be very significant to an export buyer. They might buy the Jeep over a Toyota FJ Cruiser that was also $35K, and will not have a lower price because their factory in Japan did not receive any relief from the repeal of the US income taxes.

I firmly believe that the Fair Tax will restore prosperity to America, and everyone, but especially the poor and middle class, will disproportionally benefit due to the return of jobs from overseas. Having the US poor and middle class "disproportionally benefit" is a very good thing, and will relieve the Federal Gov't of a lot of welfare / food stamp / unemployment / disability payment expense. I'd put it into effect today if I could.

about 2 months ago

Submissions

rally2xs hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

rally2xs has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...