Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Science Has a Sexual Assault Problem

rmstar Re:Then it happens less in science than in general (434 comments)

According to a study by the CDC, 51.9 percent of surveyed women and 66.4 percent of surveyed men said they were physically assaulted as a child by an adult caretaker and/or as an adult by any type of attacker.

I suppose that these figures make sense - but only after you include almost any inuendo as an assault.

Basically, I call bullshit. These numbers are way to high. I suspect they equate large swaths of inocuous stuff with real rape in order to furhter an agenda.

yesterday
top

College Students: Want To Earn More? Take a COBOL Class

rmstar Re: The UK Cobol Climate Is Very Different (268 comments)

Congratulations on employing the bottom of the barrel.

Now you know how the bottom of the barrel makes a living: by working for the bottom of the barrel. There is something like a Zen riddle somewhere hidden deep within this simple fact.

3 days ago
top

When Scientists Give Up

rmstar Re:If you think medical funding is bad (348 comments)

Even in industry, people get dismayed to the point where they leave.

No, people in the sciences don't leave because they are dismayed. It usually is because the money runs out.

about two weeks ago
top

GSOC Project Works To Emulate Systemd For OpenBSD

rmstar Re:Er? (314 comments)

The three services are actually needed. [...] centralized management of date/time and locale changes were long overdue. Linux is pretty much the only OS remaining, where application, if needed, can't really know if/when date/time or locale has changed.

Ah no, you are bringing facts into this discussion? How dare you! :-)

Thank you, actually.

about two weeks ago
top

Ask Slashdot: What Are the Strangest Features of Various Programming Languages?

rmstar Re:Powershell (729 comments)

I've studied the language pretty well. I've read the Standard enough to know that a lot of stuff is well defined, and when I go through the program, I see only constructs I recognize as defined (or implementation-defined, or unspecified, and we won't write code that depends on anything unspecified).

Or, put another way, you have spent a very large number of hours to master this stuff. This is a failure of language design, as it is known that you can write languages that do not require such a high time investment.

It is possible to write conforming C++ programs

I don't think anyone is disagreeing with you on this point. The critique is that is needlessly difficult. Even an expert has a bad day now and then, and when that happens, in C++ he is exposed to a much larger number of pitfalls and traps than in other languages.

about two weeks ago
top

Ask Slashdot: What Are the Strangest Features of Various Programming Languages?

rmstar Re:Powershell (729 comments)

We write good C++ here, and enforce it with code reviews.

So you do but you don't? Very good, my friend. Very good.

about two weeks ago
top

Ask Slashdot: What Are the Strangest Features of Various Programming Languages?

rmstar Re:Powershell (729 comments)

Of course, the more you explain about C the less sensible it appears. ;)

It's funny, really.

Quote:

both in C and certainly in C++, it is uncommon to see a screenful containing only well defined and conforming code.

That's what proper language design is supposed to avoid. Oh well.

about two weeks ago
top

Why Women Have No Time For Wikipedia

rmstar Re:why the focus on gender balance? (579 comments)

Why not let women do what they want instead of trying to force them in to places that aren't necessarily their thing?

You mean, let them care about cooking and pink dresses instead of dealing with psychopathic jerks on wikipedia? I'm sure that if you think this through, you will at some point (maybe in a decade? nah, optimistic) reach some from of enlightenment on the issue. It helps if you talk to actual women, too.

about three weeks ago
top

Elementary OS "Freya" Beta Released

rmstar Re:Usability is THE killer feature that Linux need (209 comments)

As someone who uses Ubuntu as their primary desktop OS both at home and at work, I have to say that usability is the biggest feature holding back Linux desktop.

I keep wondering about this one. Because of work requirements, I started using windows again after a long hiatus, and find it rather cranky (windows 7). It was easier to program the reactions to my marble ball mouse under linux than it was under windows 7 (essentially impossible to get reasonable scroll-wheel emulation). Then there isn't anything remotely comparable with xmodmap. I can't have multiple desktops. Files are named in weird ways (PROGRA~1, etc) that have their special rules (it really is much simpler in linux). The keyboard layout kept unhelpfully switching to whatever it felt was right, and it took a long battle to ensure it stays where I want it. And Skype has annoying ads under windows.

Installing updates is gargantuan pain in the buttocks, especially when compared with ubuntu. In windows, a reboot is almost always necessary after downloading and installing updates. Quite often you need multiple reboots, and all of it takes ages. Under ubuntu they are much faster and unintrusive.

So, in my experience Windows actually sucks compared to a decent linux distro. All the talk about the little annoying things in linux is, I think, due to an illusion. Windows is popular today because it was popular yesterday, so people are used to it and all its little (and not so little) annoying things. They just don't notice anymore.

about a month ago
top

Snowden Granted 3 More Years of Russian Residency

rmstar Re:Not about leverage or influence (266 comments)

You do remember the "girls band" members that tried to desecrate the church right? Russia is not kind to it's detractors.

Fun fact: had these girls done that very same thing in a german church, they would have landed in jail. Probably a better jail, but a jail nonetheless. In other countries, with other sites of religious worship, they would have been killed.

So please, keep it real. Russia is no paradise, but it's not by a very large margine the worst place in the world. Among other things, they have a lot less people in jail than the USA does.

about a month and a half ago
top

New Microsoft CEO Vows To Shake Up Corporate Culture

rmstar Re:Wha? (204 comments)

Other sources have it as 'increase'.

Actually, it is 'increase' already in the linked article. The quote is

"We will increase the fluidity of information and ideas by taking actions to flatten the organization and develop leaner business processes,"

And it actually makes sense.

about 2 months ago
top

Tesla Aims For $30,000 Price, 2017 Launch For Model E

rmstar Re:As a Quebecer... (247 comments)

I'm pretty jealous of American billionaires who *do* things.

Elon Musk is south african.

about 3 months ago
top

Overkill? LG Phone Has 2560x1440 Display, Laser Focusing

rmstar Re:Specs On Paper & Buyer Mindset (198 comments)

This is simply a stats arms race.

one that seems overheating, too. You can buy quite well speced smart phones (way better than an iPhone, as you have correctly noted) for a very decent prize. Manufacturers seem to be running out of ideas on how to get traction in this market, so this is what they come up with: over-the-top-specs.

A market full of smartphones that can't find a way to differentiate themselves from each other seems to me like a market ready for collapse.

about 3 months ago
top

Japanese Stem Cell Debacle Could Bring Down Entire Center

rmstar Re:Why do scientists falsify? Or how can they? (52 comments)

Why do scientists falsify? Or how can they? They must know they will be found out - especially the more sensational the finding.

The answer to that is that they fool themselves. If you ever have been at a top institution of this kind you might have witnessed a certain mix of hubris, megalomania and groupthink. These people tend to be really good, but their selfconfidence, their lack of understanding of statistics, their mutual reinforcement, and the huge pressure to keep producing blockbuster research can warp their thinking. It would not surprise me that they believed the results to be true, but thought it was just the damned data that kept being wrong.

This sectlike atmosphere at some of these institutions is compounded by the fact that people there work so insanely hard that they don't have time to take a step back and think things through.

about 3 months ago
top

NSF Researcher Suspended For Mining Bitcoin

rmstar Re:Throw the book... maybe literally at him. (220 comments)

Sure, it's not going to set any records, but with 500-1000 cores and 5-10TB of RAM, it's a lot more than most users will ever see.

Can you provide any links? I'm interested. Thanks.

about 3 months ago
top

NSF Researcher Suspended For Mining Bitcoin

rmstar Re:Throw the book... maybe literally at him. (220 comments)

Many of those systems have no (or minimal) idle time.

In my experience, this is true only for the top machines in terms of reputation of the institution where they are run. Many more supercomputing facilities actually idle around a lot if not most of the time. They were bought to confer bragging rights and are embedded into a context that makes them unable to operate effectively.

A lot of these machines are hard to program for, and the institutions that own them hard to deal with (often universities with bad bureaucracy and ridiculous internal rules) which means few bother and even fewer get to run code on them. Of course that is something that is rarely admitted in public.

I think the guy did wrong and should be punished. OTOH, I think he also deserves an award for showing (again) how ridiculous the whole HPC thing actually is. Here we have these supposedly super-high-end machines (in terms of running benchmark software) which just aren't competitive by a hilariously large margin with what is out there mining bitcoins. How embarrasing.

about 3 months ago
top

A Measure of Your Team's Health: How You Treat Your "Idiot"

rmstar Re: Really? (255 comments)

It is coincidence. Our team idiot is the company owner.

Even after factoring in that he's most likely making more money than you?

about 4 months ago
top

Security Researchers Threatened With US Cybercrime Laws

rmstar Re:This is what happens... (156 comments)

I would say it was only amoral if exploited for one's own gain or to others' detriment.

So if a hack gives reputation to a security researcher while embarrassing the website owners - how is this not exploitation for the researchers gain to the website owners detriment? You go there and pull off an I-am-smart-and-you-are-a-moron on these folks that are trying to make a living. How is that different from being an asshole?

The argument that security researchers are actually doing good is just an unsubstantiated assumption that needs closer scrutiny, and it is quite likely not true in many situations. For example, the SCADA vulnerabilities have not led to any major or even minor problem, yet they have generated a lot of FUD and maybe even given ideas to criminals and terrorists. Researchers have gotten their nice reputation out of this, but what has the world gained? And look at how the credit card industry works. A lot of their shit is fundamentally flawed from a security point of view, yet it works and is quite convenient. How can that be?

Security researchers make a nuisance of themselves in many situations, and don't even realize it. Their "told you so" can be extremely costly to a company when there is trouble, because of how it affects liability issues. Most companies would not be viable if they had to fix every bug unearthed by researchers or face full liability claims when their unfixed code fails. The kind of talent needed to get security stuff right is just not available in the needed quantities at a reasonable price (i.e. hourly rates comparable to that of a janitor) so it is unreasonable to expect things to be secure. The alternative to insecure stuff is no stuff. Everybody who's not a propellerhead knows this.

about 4 months ago
top

Ask Slashdot: What Should Every Programmer Read?

rmstar C++ FQA (and ignore the downmods) (352 comments)

If you're doing C++ everything by Meyers.

If you are doing C++, you absolutely must read the Frequently Questioned Answers:

"C++ is a general-purpose programming language, not necessarily suitable for your special purpose."

It's a little (though not much) out of date, as it does not cover C++11. But the author has some comments on it, too.

Obviously I am going to be modded down, but hey. Truth is truth.

about 4 months ago
top

Why Scientists Are Still Using FORTRAN in 2014

rmstar Re:When (634 comments)

If your Fortran program ran correctly on a PC it would run correctly on a mainframe, mini, or supercomputer. More importantly, it would produce the same result. It didn't matter which compiler you used.

This isn't true. As in C, optimizations might have changed the order of fp operations resulting in subtle differences that often matter. Memory allocation (yes, the static arrays) has some really funny weirdnesses across compilers that make buggy programs produce very different results on different versions of the same compiler. The F77 language has very little support for avoiding bugs, and quite a few booby traps. Most F77 codes are just riddled with bugs and depend on undefined behavior that varies a lot from one compiler to the next.

Just look at all the code generation flags of gfortran to get an idea.

about 4 months ago

Submissions

top

England: back to Dickensian times?

rmstar rmstar writes  |  more than 3 years ago

rmstar (114746) writes "In the aftermath of the civil unrest in the UK, two guys were sentenced to four years in jail for Facebook postings that incited to riots that never happened. The judge openly acknowledges that the harsh sentences are not for the alleged crime, but are supposed to act as a deterrent against similar actions. Is this the end of freedom of expression in the UK?"
Link to Original Source
top

Greenpeace: Evacuation Area Too Small

rmstar rmstar writes  |  more than 3 years ago

rmstar (114746) writes "Independent measurements by environmentalist group Greenpeace suggest that radiation levels outside the current evacuation area around the Fukushima-1 nuclear plant are too high. They are calling for extension of the radius after measuring up to ten micro Sieverts per hour as far as 40km from the damaged plant. That amounts to the maximum allowed yearly dose of radiation for a member of the public every five days."

Journals

rmstar has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>