Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



A Working 5D Rubik's Cube

roice Re:Really 4D/5D? (171 comments)

Yes, you could represent the 4D cube state textually too (I think this is what you are asking). However, the 4D cube does not have 27 sides (also called "faces"). It has 8 faces with 27 stickers per face, verses the 3D cube which has 6 faces with 9 stickers per face. So a textual representation of the 4D cube might be something like...



And a twist would jump all the characters representing stickers from certain faces to others in a certain way. If we represent the puzzle in this way, a twist is probably more difficult to follow than the graphically projected representation of MagicCube4D though.

I've seen textual representations that try to mimick mathematical projecting down dimensions too. These are more complicated in their organization but still contain the same total number of characters representing all the different colored stickers.

Hope this helped answer your question.

more than 8 years ago



4D analogue of Megaminx Puzzle

roice roice writes  |  more than 6 years ago

roice writes "The crazy hypercubists who created the 4D and 5D Rubik's cubes (past Slashdot posts are here and here) have now developed a free working 4 dimensional software analogue of the Megaminx puzzle. Composed of 120 dodecahedral cells, the underlying structure is arguably the most beautiful of 4D geometrical shapes, with amazing symmetries and no analogue in dimensions higher than 4. Though some have already begun working on solutions for this "Hyperminx", it has yet to be solved by anyone. Also, when it comes to number of positions, it dwarfs the previous puzzles by many thousands of orders of magnitude!!"
Link to Original Source

roice roice writes  |  more than 7 years ago

roice writes "Bigger definitely is better! At one software company in Austin, you'll find a giant (4 foot by 4 foot) velcro chess board hanging on the wall. No need to be envious though, because here are pictures and simple instructions to help you make your own. The creator's game oversizing hobby has extended to making huge Rubik's Cubes as well."


roice has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?