Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

DOJ Accidentally Gives Lawyer Wiretap Transcript

saviorsloth Re:The "terrarists" have won (319 comments)

China's vast army means little in the only scenario likely to pit the United States against China in the foreseeable future: a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. To win this war, China would need to maintain aerial and naval superiority over the Strait of Taiwan for long enough to ship a small fraction of their huge army onto the island. America has 10 aircraft carriers, 8 of which are afloat at a time. I think at least 3 or 4 are kept close enough to Taiwan to respond rapidly to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. China has zero aircraft carriers. While they will be building some, America could probably maintain their significant advantage here, enough to ensure that China cannot bring its huge army to bear on Taiwan. (as long as the Chinese don't use tactical nukes.... that's a pretty serious game though)
My point is that in any situation other than an overland invasion, army size doesn't count for nearly as much as aircraft carrier strength, which America has in spades. America can respond to China's build-up by building more carriers and keeping them deployed close to the Strait of Taiwan, and as long as we keep spending more money on our military than the rest of the world combined, we could probably maintain local superiority over the Chinese in the Strait of Taiwan.
At any rate, as long as Taiwan recognizes that having the full military backing of the world superpower is about the best deal any tiny state under threat by a huge totalitarian power ever got, they should keep quiet under the fuzzy "one state - two systems" doctrine. Also, America is important to the Chinese economy, and the Chinese leaders would be loathe to jeopardize social stability by cutting off their profitable, employment-generating trade with America.
Your points about Bush's slide towards a police state are completely valid though. thank goodness his term ends fairly soon.

more than 7 years ago

Submissions

top

saviorsloth saviorsloth writes  |  more than 7 years ago

saviorsloth writes "The BBC is running an article on a proposed system to recharge electronic devices wirelessly using the resonance of electromagnetic waves to transmit energy over three to five meters. If they do make such a system, we'll all just have to pray that the GI Joes can keep this thing out of the hands of Cobra Commander and Serpentor!"

Journals

saviorsloth has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?