Beta

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Georgia Tech Researchers Jailbreak iOS 7.1.2

sexconker Easy As 1 (44 comments)

Circumventing the restrictions in iOS is as easy as 1.
1: Buy a better phone.

3 hours ago
top

Peter Hoddie Talks About His Internet of Things Construction Kit (Video)

sexconker Shitvertisement (53 comments)

No thanks. The "Internet of Things" isn't happening, your shitty video isn't getting played, and some shitty product isn't getting my attention.
And for future reference, all thigns on the internet are things - the internet is already an internet of things.

In fact, everything is a thing, and no thing is nothing. So please go Fuck Yourselves as a Service on the Cloud you rode in on, you worthless marketing fucks.

yesterday
top

Ask Slashdot: When Is It Better To Modify the ERP vs. Interfacing It?

sexconker Re:No matter how common you think it is... (202 comments)

Always fucking expand the first instance of your acronym in your summary. Always.

Many of have absolutely nothing to do with Enterprise resource planning in our day-to-day lives. A lot of us don't care about a strategic business unit. Most slashdotters are in the field of making software, not babbling almost-but-not-quite-meaningless business jargon about software.

Thank you. I was confused because I didn't know what ERP and SBU meant, but thanks to your post I now know that they're just 2 more completely useless terms bandied about by PHBs.

yesterday
top

$299 Android Gaming Tablet Reviewed

sexconker Re:What's the market for this? (65 comments)

What if the ultimate goal of the design concept was not stream from a PC, but stream over the internet from a datacenter using many Tesla or other high-end nVidia GPU's in a datacenter? Think about it... the client hardware becomes thin (most importantly less expensive) and the heavy lifting is done on the server-side in the cloud. By the way, now the costs for hardware are passed onto the game publisher rather than the end-user. Transitioning from a end-user component designer to a complete game system solution provider may be very viable for nVidia's future. Gaming is where nVidia is strong, why doesn't this make sense to develop the IP for future markets and opportunities? After all, if Google or other large companies force a faster better stronger Internet fabric...we may actually see end to end latencies drop low enough and bandwidth to be high enough to do this well. Sounds like a smart plan to me.

Welcome to 3 years ago with OnLive and Gaikai.
The compression and latency make it a fucking terrible experience.

3 days ago
top

Senate Bill Would Ban Most Bulk Surveillance

sexconker Re:doesn't matter (176 comments)

Not that I disagree with part #2 (that penalties are needed), but a law without penalties isn't necessarily completely useless. Right now, if I went to court to protest the treatment I'm getting, I'd get nowhere because the behavior is legal. At least making it illegal may give people some legs to stand on.

If this is even an increment in the right direction, it might not be enough, but it's more than we've been getting.

The behavior isn't legal at all, it's completely unconstitutional.

3 days ago
top

UK Team Claims Breakthrough In Universal Cancer Test

sexconker Re:mosquito (63 comments)

You know you have cancer when the mosquitos stop biting you.

That just means you have a penis. Mosquitoes love bitches.

3 days ago
top

A Router-Based Dev Board That Isn't a Router

sexconker Re:A ton of BS (53 comments)

Well, you wouldn't necessarily use 20 GPIOs on a router... but, then, this isn't a router, just a dev board based on a SoC commonly used in routers, running on a software stack also commonly used in routers.

This isn't a duck. It just walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.

5 days ago
top

Amazon's Ambitious Bets Pile Up, and Its Losses Swell

sexconker Re:surpising (168 comments)

What the value of the shares you bought going up doesn't count as a return anymore?

It only counts as profit if you sell before the bubble bursts.
If Amazon remains unprofitable, investment firms will decide to dump the stock one day, cashing out and killing the value of the stock.
Even if individuals hear about the stock dropping 10 seconds after it starts, it's too late. They'll be fucked.

about a week ago
top

Internet Explorer Vulnerabilities Increase 100%

sexconker Re: Eh? (137 comments)

The first 6 months of 2014 has seen a 100% increase in vulnerabilities compared to the previous 6 months.

Neither TFS nor TFA say that. It uses the following numbers for IE.

Year - National Vulnerability Database - Exploit-DB
2013 - 130 - 11
H1-2014 - 133 - 3

They already mentioned that the timeframe of interest in the first line of the summary was 6 months.

Of 2014. They're comparing it to all of 2013.

The amount 133 is ~twice as big as 65.

Where are you getting 65? It's not mentioned anywhere in the report. Here's the report. CTRL+F 65.

The amount has increased by more than 100%.

No, the rate has. The amount in 2014 thus far is a little more than the amount in all of 2013. You can look up all the CVEs for IE and repeat their research and specifically divide 2013 up into 1st half and 2nd half if you want to compare totals and make that claim regarding totals.

about a week ago
top

Internet Explorer Vulnerabilities Increase 100%

sexconker Re: Eh? (137 comments)

They want to say the number of vulnerabilities increased in a certain period, then they have to compare that to another period of the same length.

Not true. You can work out the average speed of a car over 10 miles and do a straight comparison with compare another car over 20 miles. There is no difference here. It's simply a rate. You don't need a common divisor.

If you have 10 vulnerabilities from January 1st through June 30th of 2014 and you have 10 vulnerabilities from January first through December 31st of 2013, that does not mean the number of vulnerabilities has increased by 100%.
The number of vulnerabilities per time has, but the number has not. Both numbers are 10. 10 is 0% more than 10.

They're making a prediction on the total number of vulnerabilities based on the rate of vulnerabilities. That's fine, and it's pretty safe to assume it will end up being fairly accurate. But you cannot say the total number of vulnerabilities has increased 100% unless you're directly comparing total numbers and not rates. The rate of vulnerabilities is 100% higher, vulnerabilities in 2014 are on track to be 100% higher, and possibly the number of vulnerabilities in the first half of 2014 IS 100% higher than the number of vulnerabilities in the first half of 2013, or second half, or last 3 days, or whatever you want to compare against.

They're comparing rates and extrapolating predicted totals and then making a factual claim regarding the totals for 2014. That's simply wrong. 2014's totals are not yet known, we simply have a lower bound. Compare rates and make your claim based on the rates, or compare 6 months in 2014 to 6 months in 2013. Which 6 months is up to you - you could choose the first half, the second half, the even months, the odd months, the months with the most vulnerabilities, the months with the least vulnerabilities, etc.

about a week ago
top

Internet Explorer Vulnerabilities Increase 100%

sexconker Re: Eh? (137 comments)

It's simple: You can't say an amount has increased by X when you're comparing rates.
If they want to say the number of vulnerabilities increased in a certain period, then they have to compare that to another period of the same length.

about a week ago
top

Western US States Using Up Ground Water At an Alarming Rate

sexconker I Welcome This (376 comments)

As someone living in California, I can't wait until the Sideways bunch are forced to grow their grapes in a different fucking state.

about a week ago
top

Lawrence Krauss: Congress Is Trying To Defund Scientists At Energy Department

sexconker Re:Que surprise? (307 comments)

If anything happens to anyone connected to the US government on August 10th, you're in for a lot of torture.

about a week ago
top

Lawrence Krauss: Congress Is Trying To Defund Scientists At Energy Department

sexconker Good (307 comments)

The DoE should be focused on shit that works. They should not be spending a dime on any "green" bullshit since it's destined to fail, nor should they be wasting any resources on any climate change "research" (politicking).

Get back to actual science. I don't yet have a fusion reactor in my home. What the fuck am I paying you clowns for?

about a week ago
top

Internet Explorer Vulnerabilities Increase 100%

sexconker Re: Eh? (137 comments)

The number of vulnerabilities per time is not the same as the number of vulnerabilities.
You can't say the number of vulnerabilities has increased 100% by using two measurements of vulnerabilities / time and then normalizing both with respect to time. That gets you a normalized number of vulnerabilities per time, not a normalized number of vulnerabilities.

about a week ago
top

AirMagnet Wi-Fi Security Tool Takes Aim At Drones

sexconker Re:Makes Perfect Sense (52 comments)

If someone plugs in a router with a spoofed MAC of an allowed device for that port, you'd never know.
Most routers support MAC spoofing in order to forward the MAC of your main PC to the cable / DLS modem. Many ISPs will block a new MAC for a period of time or until your call up and tell them. If you require authentication on a wired port, they could set that up as well.
The only way to prevent a MITM attack is to physically secure the network wiring or centrally manage per-device encryption keys/certificates. And I know you're not doing that. And if you want to claim that you are, I also know you're not doing it for your printers and other devices.

For wireless, if someone plugs in a wireless router you might be able to detect it if you have antennas in range, but you can't stop it.

The air marshal shit Meraki does is completely illegal. You can't jam wifi, which is all Meraki does for "containment". They even fucking admit that it's illegal to use it in their documentation.
From https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/p... , page 8:

2As containment renders any standard 802.11 network completely ineffective, containment measures should taken in your airspace. Extreme caution should be taken to ensure that containment is not being performed on a legitimate network nearby and, action should only be taken as a last resort. Unauthorized containment is prosecutable by law (subject to the FCC’s Communications Act of 1934, Section 333, ‘Willful or Malicious Interference’).
http://transition.fcc.gov/Repo...

Beyond the legality, it doesn't even work in a manner that could be called secure. It creates bubbles of noise where NO wifi works (hello DoS). It becomes a loudness war and the rogue AP will always have a bubble of effective range where it will win out. If you have two Meraki networks near each other, they often get into wars, shutting each other down where their edges meet.

VLANs has nothing to do with wireless security. Segregating your networks with a VLAN is pointless - all the devices that are wireless APs also include routing functions. Use them. VLANs are meant for logically extending a network that is physically separate, not for logically separating a network that is physically connected.

about two weeks ago
top

MIT's Ted Postol Presents More Evidence On Iron Dome Failures

sexconker Re:Here we go... (454 comments)

They're not at war? Are you high? Hamas has declared war on Israel from day one. At this very moment Israel and Gaza is exchanging rockets missiles and bombs and hundreds of people are being killed every day. If, as you say, "Israel could wipe them out in a matter of days", then do it and get it over with.

Israel are trying to minimise casualties on both sides. Hamas are trying to maximise Israeli casualties, and use Palestinian casualties to their political advantage. It's a perfect example of asymmetrical warfare; the capabilities and aims of the combatants are completely different.

Israel has the military capability to destroy Gaza, just as the US had the military capability to destroy Iraq or Afghanistan back in 2003. But doing so is not in their long-term interests.

Do yourself a favor and drop your agenda and take a fresh look at what has been going on for decades. Israel is absolutely not trying to minimize casualties. They'll do everything and anything they can get away with, toeing the line as long as they have the backing of the US, which prevents anyone from doing anything about their horse shit.

about two weeks ago
top

MIT's Ted Postol Presents More Evidence On Iron Dome Failures

sexconker Re:Here we go... (454 comments)

If Israel is not willing to do the above, then don't complain when Hamas have to improvise just to have a fighting chance of defending themselves.

Two points: First, their improvisations are war crimes; second, Hamas are the aggressor. This is not particularly complicated.

There is no crime in war. War has no law.

Regardless, if you want to morally judge the actions of both sides here, Israel comes out looking far, far worse.

about two weeks ago
top

CCP Games Explains Why Virtual Reality First Person Shooters Still Don't Work

sexconker Re:Or is it unrealistic speed? (154 comments)

Hardly - you up to join me for a 10 mile hike tomorrow?

Seriously - walk around for a while at a normal walking pace and pay attention to how fast your body actually turns when going around corners. Or sit somewhere and watch other people do so as they go about their day - it's not nearly as fast as you would imagine. Certainly we *can* turn much faster without much effort, but we don't normally do so. Which means that FPS style games are simulating us turning much faster than normal, and if you add in wide-FOV VR you end up in the situation where your eyes are telling you your turning much faster than you're acclimated to, and your inner ears that you're standing still rather than subjecting them to the rather divergent set of accelerations such a maneuver should be causing.

Why would I hike 10 miles with you?
Why would you even compare "normal walking pace" to an FPS?
Beyond that, 3-4 seconds for a 360 at a casual pace is still ridiculously absurd. I'd say anything over 1.5 seconds indicates either obesity, octogeneriacity, or some other sort of disability.
I was referring to shitty FOVs for console games, not absurd fisheye Quake shit. A correct field of view can be determined based on the display and distance. You won't get motion sickness from a wide FOV if you just set the FOV correctly.
And your inner ear takes a back seat to your vision. Your brain will quickly ignore your inner ear if it's not matching what you're seeing unless you have a medical condition. This is why the spinning tunnel illusion works (http://vortextunnel.com/). This is why it's difficult to stand still with your eyes closed. This is why the VR demos have shit like walking across a high beam. This is why when you're dizzy from spinning around 10 times with your head down on a baseball bat at the company picnic, you should focus on the guy in the outfield to steady yourself, not the ball on the tee a few feet in front of you. The more your vision mismatches what your inner ear says, the more quickly your brain stops listening to your inner ear.
When your inner ear is overriding your vision for whatever reason, you get a condition known as vertigo. If your inner ear is working normally and you have vertigo, you get a little dizzy whenever that fluid sloshes around. If your inner ear is fucked up due to infection or whatever and it's sending you bad data, you get debilitating loss of balance, motion sickness, etc.

about two weeks ago
top

CCP Games Explains Why Virtual Reality First Person Shooters Still Don't Work

sexconker Re:Or is it unrealistic speed? (154 comments)

It takes me 3-4 seconds to complete a full rotation in real life at normal speeds, and if I spend much time turning quicker than that I start to get nauseous without any simulator needed

3-4 seconds? Is that 1 second per hundred pounds?

about two weeks ago

Submissions

top

17" Unibody MacBook Pro Disassembled

sexconker sexconker writes  |  more than 5 years ago

sexconker (1179573) writes "The folks at ifixit.com have gotten their mitts on one of the new 17", unibody MacBoock Pros. You can see the complete disassembly here.
Of interesting note is the battery which Apple hyped up: Packaging-wise it's just a standard laptop battery. It's also trivial to remove, so you can expect to see replacements from the usual third parties in the coming months."

Link to Original Source
top

Street View Driver Kills Deer

sexconker sexconker writes  |  more than 5 years ago

sexconker (1179573) writes "A street view was found showing street view driver hitting a deer, and driving off. The deer died after rolling around for a while. Google has removed the images (first saying they were unavailable due to high demand, and later saying they had been removed), but they can be found below. The images show the deer before and after the impact. There was no other vehicle near the vicinity at the time. http://i41.tinypic.com/neja6e.jpg http://i40.tinypic.com/x60p06.jpg http://i41.tinypic.com/2vc6wlf.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/2ductw2.jpg http://i42.tinypic.com/2q24ymf.jpg http://i40.tinypic.com/2lxa683.jpg http://i43.tinypic.com/6ibequ.jpg http://i44.tinypic.com/vgjz0y.jpg"
top

Microsoft to Pull Seinfeld Ads

sexconker sexconker writes  |  more than 5 years ago

sexconker (1179573) writes "According to valleywag, Microsoft is pulling its recent series of ads featuring Jerry Seinfeld. The decision to drop the ads likely stemmed from the fact that most viewers just didn't get them. MS reps are spinning the decision to drop Seinfeld as "planned" and say that Seinfeld could be involved in future projects. The ads cost Microsoft in excess of $10 million."
top

DivX Releases H.264 Decoder

sexconker sexconker writes  |  more than 6 years ago

sexconker (1179573) writes "DivX is finally jumping on the H.264 bandwagon with Project Remoulade.

Project Remoulade is an H.264 decoder and is designed to be highly scalable and compatible with just about any twisted form of the MPEG spec you can throw at it. In typical DivX fashion, we can expect a push to get this integrated into portable devices. We'll also probably see branding and profiles for set top boxes. Early info and benchmarks are at the link.

There's currently no word on a compressor implementation (the benchmarks were run against samples created with x.264), however."

Link to Original Source
top

New Study Sheds Light Into the Behavior of Cats

sexconker sexconker writes  |  more than 5 years ago

sexconker (1179573) writes "A recent study involving has revealed some interesting results.
Researchers at have discovered that .

The study involved .
When , researches noticed some odd behavior; the the , and even tried to .

Proof positive that ? The study can be found here:"

Link to Original Source

Journals

sexconker has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?
or Connect with...

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>