Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



US House May Pass "Cap & Trade" Bill

shystershep politics as usual (874 comments)

They told me that if I voted for McCain, science would continue to be subverted in favor of religion and political expediency. And they were right!

more than 5 years ago

The Worst US Cities To Work In IT

shystershep Bentonville? (538 comments)

I wish they'd enlightened us as to some of their 'subjective' reasons for their choices. The Northwest Arkansas metro area (Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville & Rogers) regularly makes the top ten of 'best places to live' lists. It's not New York, if that's your thing, but then they listed Boston & SF, too, so WTF?

more than 5 years ago

Blizzard Wins Major Lawsuit Against Bot Developers

shystershep Re:Good News for Blizzard, bad news for copyright (838 comments)

I don't want to sound like a condescending ass, but I am a lawyer. (So I guess that makes me a condescending ass . . . ? Not exactly how I meant it, but sure sounds that way, & can't really argue.)

The '900-page' contract you mention would be unenforceable, but not because someone missed that clause. In every jurisdiction in the US there are four (depending on how they're broken down) requirements for a valid contract: competent parties, legal subject matter, mutual agreement, and valid consideration.

The first is easy - you can't hold a 6-year-old or insane person to their agreements. The second means that contracts for drugs or prostitution are not enforceable. The third means that the parties agree on what the contract is. And the fourth is that there has to be an exchange of something valuable - an agreement to give someone a gift is not enforceable (in most circumstances).

Totally aside from the fraud/misrepresentation issue of trying to trick someone out of their car, the contract you're talking about would be voidable for lack of consideration: it doesn't have to be equal, but you have to show that each side intended to give up something of value to them in exchange for what the other side was giving up.

You could argue a lack of consideration when you think you're getting an unencumbered piece of software, and the other side knows you're only getting a limited license, but you will run into all sorts of problems with that. First, the sofware vendor is going to be able to point out that everyone in the industry only sells licenses, and they'll be able to give examples of mammoth organizations like Wal-Mart or the U.S. government purchasing software on a per-seat license basis. Second, they're going to argue that there would be a failure of consideration if the transaction were structured as a sale instead of a license, because then they would be giving up all sort of rights that would be valued much higher than the $50 you forked over at Best Buy.

As for mutuality, it says right there on the box what you are getting. If you believe that you are getting more than the EULA allows, in direct contradiction to what that warning says, then that's a unilateral mistake and a unilateral mistake is not going to get you very far.

Not wanting the EULA to be binding is not the same as saying that it is. For a non-tangential precedent, see Tres Jeanee, Inc. v. Brolin Retail Systems Midwest, ___ F.3d ___ (W.D.Ky. 2007), in which the court, when faced with the validity of a EULA, looked at other jurisdictions and concluded:

a survey of cases from other jurisdictions suggests that clickwrap agreements requiring the user to assent to their terms are generally upheld in the face of allegations of insufficient notice of terms.

The Seventh Circuit has explicitly upheld EULAs, where the sole issue in the case was the validity of a 'shrink wrap' license agreement where the terms were only a notice was on the outside of the box and the terms were inside. ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, , 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996). The court gives a good example in that one: warranties on consumer goods. By your argument (and that of the defendant in that case) no warranty would be valid because you didn't know the terms when you purchased the product. I would highly recommend reading the case, it's fairly clearly written. I'll leave you with one last quote, from the court's discussion of the Uniform Commercial Code (which has been adopted in most, if not all, states):

A vendor, as master of the offer, may invite acceptance by conduct, and may propose limitations on the kind of conduct that constitutes acceptance. A buyer may accept by performing the acts the vendor proposes to treat as acceptance. And that is what happened. ProCD proposed a contract that a buyer would accept by using the software after having an opportunity to read the license at leisure. This Zeidenberg did. He had no choice, because the software splashed the license on the screen and would not let him proceed without indicating acceptance. So although the district judge was right to say that a contract can be, and often is, formed simply by paying the price and walking out of the store, the UCC permits contracts to be formed in other ways. ProCD proposed such a different way, and without protest Zeidenberg agreed. Ours is not a case in which a consumer opens a package to find an insert saying "you owe us an extra $10,000" and the seller files suit to collect. Any buyer finding such a demand can prevent formation of the contract by returning the package, as can any consumer who concludes that the terms of the license make the software worth less than the purchase price.

more than 6 years ago



Google OS Announced

shystershep shystershep writes  |  more than 5 years ago

shystershep writes "Rumors have been floating around for years that Google was planning an OS to compete with Window. As of Tuesday night, it is official: "So today, we're announcing a new project that's a natural extension of Google Chrome — the Google Chrome Operating System. It's our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be. Google Chrome OS is an open source, lightweight operating system that will initially be targeted at netbooks. Later this year we will open-source its code, and netbooks running Google Chrome OS will be available for consumers in the second half of 2010." It is separate from the Android mobile OS, will run on both x86 and ARM processors, and is aimed primarily at web use. Other than that, details are scarce."

New Line Stiffed Tolkein's Estate, Too

shystershep shystershep writes  |  more than 6 years ago

shystershep writes "The trust that manages the estate of J.R.R. Tolkein's "Lord of the Rings" trilogy is suing New Line Cinema, the Hollywood studio that obtained the rights to produce films based upon his works. It is seeking over $150 million for breach of contract, plus punitive damages and the revocation of the studio's right to make more Tolkien-based movies. The lawsuit cites the problems that Peter Jackson had getting paid, and accuses the studio, as he did, of "engaging in the infamous practice of 'Hollywood accounting.'""
Link to Original Source

The 64-bit Question: XP or Vista?

shystershep shystershep writes  |  more than 7 years ago

shystershep writes "Here's the deal: my current system is getting a bit long in the tooth, and I've upgraded it about all that I reasonably can. So I'm planning on building a box. It will of course have a 64-bit CPU (x64). My primary OS will be Linux, never mind the flavor. I will also be installing a version of Windows, however, to be used almost exclusively for gaming (yes, I know there are games that work under Linux, but I am also interested in games which do not). So my question is, which would it be better for me, Windows XP Pro x64 or Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit? They are roughly the same price to buy, and I don't see any advantage with going for the 'ultimate' edition. Which is better for performance? Application compatibility? Availability of drivers (keep in mind I'm building from scratch, and therefore can pick and choose hardware on this basis)? And what about a couple years down the road: will XP still be comparable, or would going with Vista be better for the continuing updates and increased focus on it?"




shystershep shystershep writes  |  more than 11 years ago

Didn't really have anything to say at this point; just thought that the page looked a bit too empty without any journal entries. So now that's taken care of . . .

I suppose I ought to get back to work now.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?