Beta

Slashdot: News for Nerds

×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

15-Year-Old Developing a 3D Printer 10x Faster Than Anything On the Market

sstamps 15 year old marketing genius? (203 comments)

Though that marketing video, while "snazzy", is pretty pedestrian, as marketing videos go.

There are some bona fide "kid geniuses" out there who have done amazing things (though many with lots of help from family/friends/other adult geniuses). That said, there are 100 times more who talk a good line, but have nothing to show for it.

I'll wait until I see the goods before I pronounce anyone "kid genius".

about two weeks ago
top

IRS Recycled Lerner Hard Drive

sstamps Re:right-wing spin (682 comments)

And here we see extremism in its final stage. Kill those who disagree with you.

FTFY

Not like lunatic conservative nutjobs haven't said the same fucking thing over and over for years.

Though, I have to say, if those nutjobs (of either stripe) come around looking to shoot anybody, I will be glad to bury their corpses in my lime pit after I am done with them.

about a month ago
top

IRS Lost Emails of 6 More Employees Under Investigation

sstamps Re:Massive conspiracy (465 comments)

I was aware, as I have read and cited the report here and elsewhere several times in the last year.

The report does NOT refute the argument. You're reading into it more than it actually says.

The report is flawed in this area, because no other political affiliations were checked to see if they were also targeted. The IG *ONLY* looked at "Tea Party" groups, and lamented this fact in his later congressional testimony. A more thorough and detailed review will likely reveal that there were a number of groups improperly targeted, not just "Tea Party" groups.

You'll also note on the next page, it says that quite a few groups which DO trigger the normal, acceptable criteria for special review were not sent to the unit. The whole process was more broken than it was politically selective.

about a month ago
top

IRS Lost Emails of 6 More Employees Under Investigation

sstamps Re:Massive conspiracy (465 comments)

Yeah, AFTER the TIGTA report came out telling them that they could, sure.

about a month ago
top

IRS Lost Emails of 6 More Employees Under Investigation

sstamps Re:Massive conspiracy (465 comments)

Schedule B filings are public information. Normally, the names of the donors are redacted before it is released, but it was not done in this case.

That said, their case has already been set back by the judge, denying punitive damages, because NOM had "made no showing from which a reasonable jury could find that the disclosure of its Schedule B was the result of willfulness or gross negligence". Doesn't look like there's going to be a felony conviction forthcoming from that.

Still haven't cited the relevant law which was broken, too.

Keep trying, though.

about a month ago
top

IRS Lost Emails of 6 More Employees Under Investigation

sstamps Re:Massive conspiracy (465 comments)

..and you should also read what the IG said AFTER the report in congressional testimony, where he admits he was 'very concerned' that his report missed progressive targeting.

You should also, you know, READ the original TIGTA report, too. It is very enlightening, even with its admitted flaws. For example, the targeting was still a very small part of the total applications, and the "Tea Party" targeting was also less than a third of all targeted applications.

Internal BOLO spreadsheets are hardly secret. They are little more than worksheets to help people get their jobs done, and are distributed to everyone in the unit.

It wasn't unlawful, since no "illegal information" was required or used. If you think it was, cite the law that was broken. My wager is that you can't. Thus, I'll stick with "not unlawful" until you (or anyone else) demonstrates otherwise.

As for being harmful, it was no more harmful than it was for the other 2/3rds of the organizations which were sent to the unit for further processing. That it took forever affected everyone, not just "Tea Party" groups. Further, the law even provides for the ability for applicants to sue the IRS to expedite their application after 270 days, and NONE of them availed themselves of it. NONE.

But, you know, don't let silly little things like facts quash a good witchhunt.

about a month ago
top

IRS Lost Emails of 6 More Employees Under Investigation

sstamps Re:Massive conspiracy (465 comments)

It wasn't a conspiracy.

a) It wasn't secret, nor was it "covered up".
b) It wasn't unlawful (go on, name the law that they broke if you disagree)
c) It wasn't particularly harmful (the only group that was denied as a result was a PROGRESSIVE group).

Now, did it violate policy? Maybe. They treated it like it was, but it is the job of the IRS to investigate applicants for the status in question. If anything, I would argue that they have been violating policy with the ridiculous amount of grants of c(3) status for years to organizations who OBVIOUSLY do not qualify for it.

THAT is the REAL scandal here.

about a month ago
top

Google: Indie Musicians Must Join Streaming Service Or Be Removed

sstamps Still confused, even after reading TFA (364 comments)

It says that musicians, who are signed with an indie label that has not agreed to the "terms", will have their videos removed/blocked.

What "terms"? How does this affect indie musicians who are not signed to an affected indie label (or an indie label at all)? Do they also have to agree to these so-called "terms"?

Maybe if Google had someone who wasn't a low-grade moron marketroid answering such questions with real answers, they could avoid egg on their face, as well as rotten tomatoes, then torches and pitchforks.

about a month ago
top

Facebook Data Miner Will Shock You

sstamps Re:And this is why.... (164 comments)

I don't and never will use Farcebork or any kind of social media service which is specifically designed to profit off of me, using my personal information, without my permission or consent, let alone knowledge.

about 3 months ago
top

Facebook Data Miner Will Shock You

sstamps Re:And this is why.... (164 comments)

I don't think an early comment on some website would qualify as "important".

Maybe writing an article about it and getting it submitted to /. might qualify. But, then, I guess it would be important to someone other than just him, huh?

No, I think you need help, at least in figuring out how to discern relevance and context.

about 3 months ago
top

F.C.C., In Net Neutrality Turnaround, Plans To Allow Fast Lane

sstamps Re:Even better... (410 comments)

I've given up on mass media for nearly a decade now. I find independent sources of entertainment and pay the content creators directly.

The only way to kill the monster we collectively created is to starve it into non-existence. People have the power to effect positive change, but they have to be smart, educated, and courageous enough with their votes and their wallets to make it happen. Part of that entails educating their family and friends and spreading that knowledge and courage around.

For those that leave the system early, it's a lot tougher, but it will pay off in the long run.

about 3 months ago
top

WhatsApp Is Well On Its Way To A Billion Users

sstamps Real users? (116 comments)

I'm sure Farcebork brought them some more visibility than they had, but what evidence is there that even most of them are actual bona fide new users, rather than just new accounts? FB has a history of having a significant percentage of their "accounts" being little more than "likebots" to float their "pay for likes" scheme.

(See VSauce's channel on YT for a rather telling commentary on the FB "like" scam).

about 3 months ago
top

'The Door Problem' of Game Design

sstamps As a game developer... (305 comments)

I don't think she does a very good job of explaining why good game design is difficult.

It's not that game design itself is difficult, it is that GOOD (ie, fun) game design is difficult. She's basically addressing the wrong problem set. What she is describing is simply software design and engineering issues, which boils down to 3 real categories:

1. Functional / feature design: the rules which govern whether they exist and how they can function. AKA "business rules" in normal software development.
2. User Interface design: how the user (player) interacts with it.
3. Engineering/Implementation issues: how do you make 1 & 2 real and work, while reducing undesired side-effects.

1 & 2 generally form a specification for the feature's design, and 3 is the specification for how to implement it.

This is not unlike many common design and implementation processes for standard software design and engineering of complex systems. The real difference is that, while a software system designed and implemented correctly may fulfill all the intended design objectives, there is an additional objective which games add to the mix that is not generally present in normal business applications: fun. Unfortunately, it is not an objective criteria, and requires "play-testing" to discern whether a particular design is fun or not. It is very difficult to design-in "fun" from the very start of a project.

That said, with the advent of Serious Games, adding the "is it fun?" criteria to real-world business applications is happening more often.

Lastly, as a game developer, the single greatest challenge I have encountered is simply to keep going through the "hard times". Like any difficult software development project, there are times when things get dark and depressing for whatever reason, and there is difficulty keeping motivated to continue, but you have to bear down and power through the hard parts. The reason most game development projects fail that I have seen is that people don't really understand how hard it can be at times, and give up when the going gets tough. To me, this is a more difficult hurdle than in typical business application development, because many people get into the development of games with an incorrect level of expectation about said difficulty.

about 3 months ago
top

Blender Foundation Video Taken Down On YouTube For Copyright Violation

sstamps Re:Blender should file a Counter Claim against Son (306 comments)

It makes perfect sense, because it is germane to the issue, unlike your analogy.

There's nothing saying that Sony can't have a DMCA takedown printing press ready to fill in the blanks and fire a billion of them off on a moment's notice, or the technological equivalent thereof.

The fact that a) the video is blocked, b) on copyright (and, thus, statutory) grounds, at the behest of c) Sony says that the DMCA take-down process has been executed. If it hasn't, and YouTube just took it down willy-nilly, then they are liable for a plethora of legal challenges, including breach of contract and tortious interference with contractual relations.

about 4 months ago
top

Blender Foundation Video Taken Down On YouTube For Copyright Violation

sstamps Re:Blender should file a Counter Claim against Son (306 comments)

The text that appears when you try to watch the video is:

"This video contains content from Sony Pictures Movies & Shows, who has blocked it on copyright grounds. "

Using the term "copyright" makes it unequivocal -- this is clearly a statutory issue, not a contractual one between two private entities.

about 4 months ago
top

Brendan Eich Steps Down As Mozilla CEO

sstamps Re:I think this is bullshit (1746 comments)

You said:

If you don't know that basically all countries on the world have a free speech "section" in their constitution

I said:

No, only a handful of other countries grant free speech without ridiculous exceptions for things like blasphemy, attacking the authority of the State, etc.

These statements are not equivalent. Thus, strawman.

Next?

about 4 months ago
top

Brendan Eich Steps Down As Mozilla CEO

sstamps Re:I think this is bullshit (1746 comments)

Considering I said nothing of the kind in EITHER of my posts, who is the moron for propping up strawmen?

about 4 months ago
top

Brendan Eich Steps Down As Mozilla CEO

sstamps Re:I think this is bullshit (1746 comments)

No, only a handful of other countries grant free speech without ridiculous exceptions for things like blasphemy, attacking the authority of the State, etc. However, the US seems hell-bent on finding ways to add such exceptions in the name of "safety", "counter-terrorism", etc, so I am not so sure that is as much of a positive as it used to be.

Anyway, that was the point of the statement and, no, I am not a moron. Are you?

about 4 months ago
top

Brendan Eich Steps Down As Mozilla CEO

sstamps Re:Freedom of speech (1746 comments)

Can someone please post some meaningful, hopefully peer reviewed scientific evidence as to when and where we decided this was a fact?

You're on the Internet.. surely you can find some decent links to relevant scientific research and evidence. If not, here's a start:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation

As for it being a fact, I don't think anyone can or should claim it as a fact, but the bulk of the research is leaning VERY strongly in that direction. In general, that usually means we're heading towards at least a de facto acceptance of it.

Specifically, when did we learn that homosexuality was genetic, ingrained, inescapable, and as intrinsically bound to us as our race?

If at any point it's in any way a choice, then that's not discrimination. That's a difference of opinion. You're entitled to that choice, but that choice is not a RIGHT.
No matter how much we do or don't like it, or how socially acceptable it has become.

I don't think the issue of government acknowledgement and support of something as important between any two people such as marriage is really related to whether homosexuality is or is not a choice. Even if it is a choice, I think that, if two people love each other enough to consent to and accept the benefits and responsibilities of marriage, at least as far as the government is concerned, then the government (and everyone else) should get the hell out from between them.

about 4 months ago
top

Brendan Eich Steps Down As Mozilla CEO

sstamps Re:I think this is bullshit (1746 comments)

How is it his fault that he's a homophobe any more than homosexuals are at fault for being homosexuals?

While the question of whether homophobia is something one is born with is an intriguing one, there is unfortunately no evidence to back it up.

Homosexuality, on the other hand, has a significant amount of such evidence.

While it may be possible that his psychological makeup precludes eradicating an erroneous and/or irrational stance, the difference lies in the fact that homophobia, acted upon, affects other people, whereas homosexuality, acted upon, affects only themselves.

Marriage isn't a fundamental human right, it's a religious right (and therefore gays have the right to form their own church). The mainstream debate on this topic is myopic. Marriage should entail no advantage from the government, especially tax incentives.

I would have to strongly disagree with this. The ability to choose a person (or person(s)) to be lifemates, and to enjoy whatever life benefits society offers to those who partake in that choice, outside of the intrinsic benefits, is a fundamental human right. Legally, marriage is a secular artifice, but can be dressed up with any (or no) religious trappings the participants prefer. That secular artifice, including all the associated benefits and responsibilities, should be available to any and all who are able and willing to legally consent to it, regardless of any discriminatory differences between the participants.

That marriage should entail no advantage from the government I think is a bit myopic itself. There are some considerations that are part and parcel of marriage which I think deserve advantages from society and, by extension, government. Child-rearing, for one. This still applies to homosexual couples as well, since there is no reason that they cannot rear a child, despite being biologically incapable of bearing one of their own making.

about 4 months ago

Submissions

sstamps hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

sstamps has no journal entries.

Slashdot Account

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Don't worry, we never post anything without your permission.

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>
Create a Slashdot Account

Loading...