×

Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

US Air Force Selects Boeing 747-8 To Replace Air Force One

thedonger Re:track record (290 comments)

The 787 would make it practical / possible to fly into smaller airfields too. And be much, much cheaper - to purchase and run.

If you would eat your caviar and drink your Crystal on a smaller, cheaper plane, then you clearly lack what it takes to be president. Or in the senate.

yesterday
top

Astronomers Record Mystery Radio Signals From 5.5 Billion Light Years Away

thedonger Re:Boom. Boom. Boom. Another one bite's the dust.. (121 comments)

No worries ladies and gents. Just some black hole or star being absorbed into a circle of more stable vacuum than the twitchy sort of vacuum we have over here. Move along. Move along. There's literally nothing to see there.

C'mon, there's got to be some highly implausible yet scientific sounding explanation that blames it on a time hole to the future slamming shut. Right? Maybe Elon Musk has been working on a time portal, but he hasn't quite figured out how to make it appear close enough to be usable?

about two weeks ago
top

WSJ Refused To Publish Lawrence Krauss' Response To "Science Proves Religion"

thedonger Re:A Simple Retort (556 comments)

Yes, ultimately I *believe* in gravity. People find evidence of God's existence; others find evidence of gravity's existence. The difference - as I'm sure you are aware - is that one passes the scientific method; the other doesn't or won't submit to it. Then again, dogma finds a way into many non-religious things (hang out with raw vegans and you'll see that in action).

Playing my own Devil's advocate - one can argue that a man-derived scientific method is insufficient to test for the existence of God; after all, if I bake a cake and it decides I don't exist, the cake doesn't disappear.

One thing I think you have wrong -- God wouldn't be inside the universe. God created it. I suppose - going back to the cake analogy - God could bake himself into the cake. But he would still be an exo-cake being, and would have existed before the cake.

Mmmmm, cake.

about two weeks ago
top

WSJ Refused To Publish Lawrence Krauss' Response To "Science Proves Religion"

thedonger Re:A Simple Retort (556 comments)

the nature of proof is i specifically cannot prove you're not a moron, so you must be one.

I'm a moron? I was in no way implying that it means God exists. In fact, it is just as likely that it means it was a well constructed myth.

about two weeks ago
top

WSJ Refused To Publish Lawrence Krauss' Response To "Science Proves Religion"

thedonger Re:A Simple Retort (556 comments)

The probability that life would develop on any given planet...

That doesn't prove God; it only provides a good argument that we are very likely alone in the universe, at least to the extent that life has developed here. Sure, 100 light years away there may be a planet with some kind of primordial ooze on its way to becoming life as we know it; however, I'm guessing we won't be around in 100 million years to meet them. Or perhaps by then we will be the Borg and assimilate them all.

about two weeks ago
top

WSJ Refused To Publish Lawrence Krauss' Response To "Science Proves Religion"

thedonger Re:A Simple Retort (556 comments)

You have that a little wrong. God *can* (in principle) be proven. If the sky breaks open, choirs of angels break forth, a 10km-long arm reaches down from the skies and an 8km golden-haired, bearded face looks down upon humanity and utters words of unshakable truth...then God is proven.

Except that isn't going to happen. If one believes the bible, at some point the believers will be vanished into heaven, which basically proves God's existence, even if he doesn't show his golden-bearded chops directly to us (which also would kill us, again, only if one believes the bible). At that point the Antichrist rises, and if we do not follow him (or her, if it is Hillary) and we choose God then we get killed. Since the obvious choice is then God is real, but the consequence for following him is death, we get a pass on our lifetime of sin and go to heaven.

Not that I actually think that is going to happen, but it made for some entertaining 1980's rapture movies. And the book of Revelation is a great read.

about two weeks ago
top

China Lays More Fiber, Improving Physical Connection To the Worldwide Internet

thedonger Re:It's actually not a contradiction. (44 comments)

China has the largest population of internet users. Despite apparent continued attempts to censor what their citizens have access to, the Chinese are very interested in extending international market share of their three state-owned internet companies.

I read it as "China is enhancing the speed at which they can control the internet within their borders."

about two weeks ago
top

WSJ Refused To Publish Lawrence Krauss' Response To "Science Proves Religion"

thedonger A Simple Retort (556 comments)

The nature of God is such that it cannot be proven. Otherwise, we lose the choice to believe.

That said, science has yet to prove what the universe is, so how could we expect it to prove something outside of it?

Note: My philosophy is "when you die, you're dead."

about three weeks ago
top

Skeptics Would Like Media To Stop Calling Science Deniers 'Skeptics'

thedonger Re:Established science CANNOT BE QUESTIONED! (719 comments)

Proper skepticism promotes scientific inquiry, critical investigation, and the use of reason in examining controversial and extraordinary claims. It is foundational to the scientific method. Denial, on the other hand, is the a priori rejection of ideas without objective consideration.

That's funny. The first definition on Google states "a person inclined to question or doubt all accepted opinions.", which seems to be a good fit for those who are denying global warming. If anything, it seems as though the Fellows of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry should call themselves something different.

The Fellows of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry are Google Deniers.

about a month and a half ago
top

Who's To Blame For Rules That Block Tesla Sales In Most US States?

thedonger Re:We have the best form of Democracy in the world (141 comments)

While I pretty much agree with everything you say, I'd like to add one (completely subjective) detail: I don't think egotistical types are limited to government. I've seen people rise in corporate power structures as a result of ruthless and aggressive behavior. It's almost a tautology that those who crave power, who are willing to shove others aside, end up near the top of the heap. There probably aren't many auto dealerships, for example, who are run by introverted, accommodating people.

Again, it's just my opinion.

I agree. What I meant to imply is only that we don't want them in government. To reach the top level of business requires at least a little psychopathy.

about a month and a half ago
top

Who's To Blame For Rules That Block Tesla Sales In Most US States?

thedonger Re:We have the best form of Democracy in the world (141 comments)

Actually it kinda does. The ability to constantly abuse the system means there is a massive flaw in said system.

The flaw is how we use it. Freedom and liberty are hard to maintain, and we have allowed government to become something other than "we the people." It has become an entity unto itself, and as such it strives first and foremost to ensure its own survival. We have recast the role of statesman to celebrity, which guarantees ego rules the roost. Regulatory agencies within the executive branch are de facto law making bodies, and in the end we hinge our hopes on Supreme Court decisions, who amended their charter - at least in practice - to include filling in the legislative gaps left by Congress, who are too busy running their reelection campaigns.

If our government is car, we're passengers who are allowing a bunch of drunks to drive it. We are getting what we deserve, so long as we choose to not take the wheel.

about a month and a half ago
top

Who's To Blame For Rules That Block Tesla Sales In Most US States?

thedonger Re:We have the best form of Democracy in the world (141 comments)

When looking at a five-year-old article by Nate Silver that looked at political donations by car dealers, fully 88 percent of those donations went to Republican candidates, and just 12 percent to Democrats. That possibly suggests a propensity among Republican state legislators to support the interests for car dealers over those of electric-car buyers. Is the small bit of evidence enough to make a case?

But we have the best democracy you can fine anywhere. It doesn't matter if our legislators are being bribed indirectly, or get embroiled in obvious conflict of interest matters.

Welcome to the USA!

Ohh wait, let's preach to the world about free markets.

The fact that we don't use our government correctly does not make it inherently bad.

And maybe that Nate Silver stat just means that Republicans are more likely to be business owners, and that local politicians are more likely to listen to business owners.

If someone doesn't support Uber then they are acting against the principles of small government and the free market, and therefore not accurately representing Republican values.

about a month and a half ago
top

Ron Wyden Introduces Bill To Ban FBI 'Backdoors' In Tech Products

thedonger Re:This is bothersome (109 comments)

Maybe the question we should ask is, How did we reach a point where we need a bill to prevent the government from forcing its will on manufacturers?

about 2 months ago
top

Which Programming Language Pays the Best? Probably Python

thedonger Re:Yes (277 comments)

I was wondering what languages I should learn myself. I have some experience with C++, but that's over 10 years ago, and only as a hobby. I've been thinking about picking it back up, but wasn't sure if there were better options. Since I'm an adult and looking to be able to support my family, money certainly is one of the leading factors as to which language I want to get into.

A more relevant question than money may be what interests you? Automation, mobile apps, database, web, etc.? You may have the potential to make more money as a Python programmer, but will a few thousand on average more per year make the job itself more worthwhile? Would, say, only $95k per year to program C++ -- if the specific job was more to your liking -- be a deal breaker?

Another way to look at it: If you are happier doing the job, might that make you perform better and therefor out-perform the industry average?

about 2 months ago
top

Here's What Your Car Could Look Like In 2030

thedonger Re:car (144 comments)

Everything will still look the same except they'll all be wired to the internet so every place you go to will be tracked, in the name of safety

Everything will look the same, but be a half a degree warmer.

about 2 months ago
top

Complex Life May Be Possible In Only 10% of All Galaxies

thedonger Re:Let's do the math (307 comments)

Hoverboards, goddammit.

about 2 months ago

Submissions

thedonger hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

thedonger has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?