Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

How Governments Are Getting Around the UN's Ban On Blinding Laser Weapons

thrich81 Re:One of those strange rules of war. (158 comments)

If you feel that way then when your country is involved in a war which you don't approve of it is your moral duty to quit paying taxes (and take the consequences). You said, "no exceptions" and in moral involvement there isn't that much difference between funding a war and fighting in it directly.

yesterday
top

How Scientific Consensus Has Gotten a Bad Reputation

thrich81 Re:Science creates understanding of a real world. (762 comments)

And an interesting point about your 1st order explanation of AGW science is that it is the simplest and most straightforward explanation of the situation. The skeptics have to go to another level of effects to explain away why the climate should not be warming -- they have to find carbon sinks, or negative temperature feedbacks, etc. which make the model more complicated. So the persons who are demanding a simple explanation (and don't like the answer) actually want a more complicated explanation, but only to the point it supports their view. I don't have a problem with skeptics to a point but in the case of AGW, the burden is on them to explain why this 1st order description fails if they are complaining about the models getting too complicated.

about a week ago
top

How Scientific Consensus Has Gotten a Bad Reputation

thrich81 Re:Science creates understanding of a real world. (762 comments)

In many cases there is no simple explanation to real understanding and the best you can do for a layman is to use analogies and simple models which inevitably fail when pushed too hard. A good example is quantum physics -- one of the first concepts for laymen is the Pauli exclusion principle -- OK great, two electrons can't occupy the same state in a atom, got it, but then you could ask, why then can two photons occupy the same state (not subject to the exclusion principle). Well, you answer, because electrons have spin 1/2 and photons have spin 1, ... uh what is 'spin' -- well it is intrinsic angular momentum, kind of like a spinning top, but nothing is really 'spinning'. OK so why does a spin 1/2 particle obey the exclusion principle and a spin 1 particle doesn't? -- now you are stumped because there is no easy answer that I know of, it just comes out of the math of quantum field theory. So in the end the expert just has to say, "trust me, it is all in the mathematics". Each simple analogy either fails or proposes new questions which require more specialized knowledge to answer -- soon you get to where fewer than 1% of your audience can follow you -- that's not lack of your understanding -- that is the nature of reality.

about a week ago
top

Deputy Who Fatally Struck Cyclist While Answering Email Will Face No Charges

thrich81 Re:yet if we did it (463 comments)

Depends -- We had a case in Austin a couple of years ago where a young woman hit a pedestrian at night, killed her and left the scene. The driver claimed she looked down at her phone before the accident,and drifted over to the shoulder. She got off with no jail time, I don't remember if she got probation. She wasn't police, but was from a wealthy family and worked as an aide to a state legislator.

about two weeks ago
top

NASA's Competition For Dollars

thrich81 Re:Where the Money Goes (78 comments)

I don't know what 'presentation' you saw but it is bullshit. At least for FY13 (http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/outreach/022212_budget_charts.pdf) the Human Exploration and Operations (formerly known as 'Manned') percentage of NASA's budget was 45%. Its hard to argue how human operations in space (mostly ISS related) is in any way "directed at climate change". The remaining 55% includes all the planetary missions and astrophysics which again can't be called 'climate change'. Where is the 75% directed at climate change?

about two weeks ago
top

The Billion-Dollar Website

thrich81 Re:Did you expect anything else? (194 comments)

Well, I've got karma to burn and this AC got modded up to +2 insightful, so look, the argument that the current President and VP have never run/managed "anything" and so are unsuitable for the positions would be valid EXCEPT that the previous President and VP had vast private sector and government managerial experience (or at least they were sold to us that way) and they screwed up running the country at least as badly as the current administration. So, from observation of the actual, real world experiences we've gone through in the last 15 years it would seem to be clear that previous managerial experience has no correlation with good administration of the Executive branch of the US government.

about 1 month ago
top

The Billion-Dollar Website

thrich81 Re:better summary (194 comments)

So we would have been better off hiring the friends of the Bush campaign who did such a bang up job of efficient contracting in Iraq?

about a month ago
top

3 Congressmen Trying To Tie Up SpaceX

thrich81 Re:11 out of 11 (393 comments)

Great list, thanks for doing the research, but I don't think you can pin Apollo 1 on the Saturn 1B at all -- that fire was 100% due to faults in the payload, the Apollo Command Module. In your list I would say the most impressive run is the Saturn 1 -- ten out of ten successes back in the old days, first launch in 1961, and they were using a very early model liquid hydrogen upper stage in the last six flights. If you count the Saturn 1B as just an upgraded Saturn 1, then it was 19 straight successes -- 19 out of 19 attempts.

about a month ago
top

Judge Rejects $324.5 Million Settlement For Tech Workers, Argues For More

thrich81 Re:And yet (268 comments)

"the reason a government exists is to serve the people, not to earn a profit
- wrong. The reason that governments exist is our inertia, laziness and jealousy. Originally governments were all nobility with the power in hand to kill you."
No, you both are wrong on this count. The reason governments exist is because nation-states with organized governments can out-compete any other form of human organization both economically and militarily. It is conceivable that this is a local minimum in human organizational effectiveness but it has been true for some thousands of years now (often with a closely integrated religion included). This statement of reality says nothing about the desirability or morality of government but it is a statement of fact for now. Will some super-national organizations (multinational corporations) superseded governments some day -- I hope not in my lifetime. As far as the libertarian dream of loosely organized self-reliant bands of free living peoples becoming dominant? -- it's been tried, isn't going to happen.

about a month ago
top

Was America's Top Rocketeer a Communist Spy? The FBI Thought So

thrich81 Re:White Werhner von Braun may be many things... (165 comments)

Issues with this:
1) Just because von Braun may have had a hand in picking some workers does not imply he was fully aware of the conditions in Mittelwerk (location of the underground factories). Do you think he approved of his "hand-picked" technical workers being worked to death?
2) It's not like those slave laborers would have had blissful, easy existences in WWII Germany had they not been building V-2s. They were doomed in any case. There is nothing von Braun could have done about that. And Mittelwerk was used for other industry also, notably V-1 production, too, with which von Braun had no connection.
It was a horrific situation all around, but von Braun didn't set it up and he didn't have the ability to change it once it was in place. Could he have pressed for better conditions -- maybe, but probably to no avail. And von Braun had an uneasy relationship with the authorities; he got arrested once during that time and barely got out of that himself so he wasn't exactly a man with a lot of leverage to challenge the Nazi system by then.

about a month and a half ago
top

Was America's Top Rocketeer a Communist Spy? The FBI Thought So

thrich81 von Braun didn't take his place (165 comments)

von Braun didn't take anyone's place -- he created his own place in Huntsville. The work on rockets on the West Coast and other places in the US continued with little affect by von Braun. For example the Navy's Vanguard project which was supposed to launch the USA's first satellite was a parallel effort to the Army's efforts at Hunstville. And the Air Force developed the Atlas and Titan missiles in other parallel efforts. It just happened that when NASA needed big rockets for Apollo, the Saturn series developed by von Braun's team were the most suitable. Notably, precursors to Apollo, the manned orbital Mercury and Gemini missions, were launched on those Air Force derived boosters. The sentence in the summary is BS. And by all accounts, von Braun was agnostic towards the Nazis, neither a supporter nor a resister, disinterested in politics, but navigating the system he found himself by the time it was too late to get out -- yeah, I know it is more complicated than that, but I don't have a thesis to write here.

about a month and a half ago
top

Satellite Images Show Russians Shelling Ukraine

thrich81 Re:Weakest US President ever (582 comments)

Holy crap, this AC got modded up +2 already? I notice on this story that the stupidest comments so far are all ACs. There should be a rule that whenever someone says how some leader here or there is screwing up, then the commenter is required to say how they would do it better. As everyone who has made it there seems to have found out once elected President of the USA (or Prime Minister of somewhere else), the problems are a lot more complicated when you actually have to deal with them and then the fallout (maybe literally in this case) from your actions. This parent AC is a troll and should be modded as such.

about a month and a half ago
top

Lawrence Krauss: Congress Is Trying To Defund Scientists At Energy Department

thrich81 Re:Someone has an agenda to push (342 comments)

Care to explain why carbon taxes are bad? Every economist I've read who acknowledges that there are negative externalities with burning carbon based fuels says that the most efficient and non-market distorting way to get the users to pay the cost of the externalities is to impose a carbon tax. Anything else distorts the market for carbon based fuels or you just let the general population bear the cost of the negative externalities irregardless of how the gains from use of the fuels are distributed.

about 2 months ago
top

SpaceX Releases Video of Falcon Rocket's Splashdown

thrich81 Re:I wonder how long it would've taken NASA? (49 comments)

Hey Mods, but not the idiots who already got to the OP, mod the OP back up, it's not Flamebait. As a total fanboy of SpaceX, I don't totally agree, but there are legitimate points for discussion. I'd say that SpaceX innovations so far are manufacturing and management not extension of spacecraft capabilities, yet. They've got lots of good things in the works but most are not yet demonstrated.

about 2 months ago
top

NASA Names Building For Neil Armstrong

thrich81 Re:What, NASA doesn't sell there building naming r (52 comments)

What part of "not only an astronaut, but also as an AEROSPACE ENGINEER, TEST PILOT, and UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR" did you not read in the summary? Nobody worked harder than the early astronauts to get man into space and they were all engineers or scientists. A test pilot is in reality a flying engineer.

about 2 months ago
top

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Turns 45

thrich81 Re:Generating confusion (211 comments)

Hold on there with your Boomer bashing -- someone who is 70 years old NOW is not even a Boomer (missed it by 2 years) and the average age of the Congress people is old, so 10-15 years ago it wasn't Boomers in power but the vestiges of the Greatest Generation and the Silent Generation after them. Boomers have only slowly replaced them since. Add that to the outsized influence the older voters in the electorate have and you find that most of the problems blamed on the Boomers (Social Security bankruptcy for one) are actually problems started by their parents.

about 2 months ago
top

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Turns 45

thrich81 Re:And today (211 comments)

Damn, are memories this short! Constellation, Bush's project for post Shuttle manned space, was underfunded from the very beginning. Read the findings of the Augustine Commission (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_of_United_States_Human_Space_Flight_Plans_Committee) which was commissioned by the Office of Science and Technology Policy to review the state of human spaceflight in the US in early 2009. The Commission concluded, "The Committee judged the 9-year old Constellation program to be so behind schedule, underfunded and over budget that meeting any of its goals would not be possible." (quote from the Wikipedia article). I recall seeing the committee head (Norm Augustine) on TV briefing Congress, he basically said that Constellation had spent all its money with little to show for it. The Summary Report from the Commission is available on a NASA website (http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/384767main_SUMMARY%20REPORT%20-%20FINAL.pdf) and begins with the statements, "The U.S. human spaceflight program appears to be on an unsustainable trajectory. It is perpetuating the perilous practice of pursuing goals that do not match allocated resources." This was in early 2009 before Obama's first budget.
The committee members were not in any way toadies for the Obama administration but aerospace professionals who knew the business:
Norman Augustine (chairman), former CEO of Lockheed Martin, former chairman of the Advisory Committee on the Future of the United States Space Program[17]
Wanda Austin, CEO of The Aerospace Corporation
Bohdan Bejmuk, former Boeing manager
Leroy Chiao, former NASA astronaut
Christopher Chyba, Princeton University professor
Edward F. Crawley, MIT professor
Jeffrey Greason, co-founder of XCOR Aerospace
Charles Kennel, former director of Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Lester Lyles, former Air Force general
Sally Ride, former NASA astronaut, 1st American female in space

about 2 months ago
top

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Turns 45

thrich81 Re:Great example (211 comments)

You also have to remember that the entire American manned space program from Mercury through the Apollo moon landings was in reality just another contest in the Cold War between the USA and the Soviet Union. Manned space would never have gotten the funding and national priority it got in the 60's without that aspect of it. For many Americans, who were paying the bills, "beating the Russians" was the only reason for it. So to "real leadership and environment that bolsters creative problem solving" I would add, "military level budgets and priorities and wartime sense of urgency". Other than the secrecy of the former, I see little difference between the Manhattan Project and Project Apollo. If you want results on the scale of those projects then it will require similar national level commitment and resources. I've only seen that on endeavors tied to "national security".

about 2 months ago
top

Apollo 11 Moon Landing Turns 45

thrich81 Re:What if we hadn't? (211 comments)

A little history: By the time of the last Apollo mission to the moon (Dec 1972) US involvement in Vietnam was for all practical purposes over; US direct involvement officially ended in Jan 1973 with the signing of the "Paris Peace Accords". Perhaps an argument could be made that Vietnam took resources which could have gone to Apollo in earlier years, but considering that Apollo had military type budgets and priority through the 60's I doubt it. The period of maximum involvement by the US in both Vietnam and the Apollo program was the same (mid to late 60's). As both were proxy battles against the Soviets in the Cold War, this was not a coincidence. By the early 70's the American people, who were paying the bills for both, were no longer interested in either. However, in what must really be a coincidence, the last mission with Apollo hardware (Apollo-Soyuz) occurred in 1975, the same year that South Vietnam finally fell to the North Vietnam forces, putting a definitive end to that conflict.

about 2 months ago
top

Math, Programming, and Language Learning

thrich81 Obligatory Quote by Gauss (241 comments)

TFA tries to make the case (poorly) that Math involves ambiguities and Programming does not.
The greatest of all mathematicians, Carl Friedrich Gauss, stated, "I mean the word proof not in the sense of the lawyers, who set two half proofs equal to a whole one, but in the sense of a mathematician, where half proof = 0, and it is demanded for proof that every doubt becomes impossible."
Not much room for ambiguity in that.

about 2 months ago

Submissions

thrich81 hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

thrich81 has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>