Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Comments

top

Why the Universe Didn't Become a Black Hole

thunderclap Re:Big Bang is RELIGION (109 comments)

Sure, in an imaginary world where the graceful and faithful elephant works freakishly hard to make the ants live happy lives even though the ants are so tiny to imagine what this great elephant looks like or means to them. The ants who hate the elephant drown themselves in puddles of water, and we the outsider look at these drowning ants in this imaginary world and think "these ungratefully stupid ants deserve to be eliminated by natural selection." And the elephant looks at us and say "if we can save one more ant from drowning, then why don't we?"

Well, that is a good question. What can't we? Also another good question is: How do we know we aren't already inside a black hole? No one has ever been to one or seen its inside so all we have is good guesses.

3 days ago
top

Ancient Worms May Have Saved Life On Earth

thunderclap Re:Saved the earth (54 comments)

So then we need to thank Xenu and his space borne 707 and the alien greys, whites etc for all their contributions to our wonderful earth? No. You are oversimplifying it. There is far more built in redundancy that you realize.

about two weeks ago
top

Google+ Photos To Be Separated From Google+

thunderclap Re:Like Chrome don't have Google account (114 comments)

Which basically means you want to use their services but not pay for them by sharing your information. How do you think people on 4chan and other hackers dox people? YOur info, my info, everyone's info is already out there. Google is simply asking for permission via using their services. Others do not.

about three weeks ago
top

Google+ Photos To Be Separated From Google+

thunderclap Re:What's the issue? (114 comments)

You are being deliberately obtuse because you don't like that fact that the statement is obviously correct.
So I go broad. You work for a living.
Whether you work for yourself or a company you dress a specific way. While you can say they tell me how to dress for blah blah reason, no they expect you to dress because they are paying you to market themselves and their profit. If you work for yourself, you dress to project an image. That image is "sell yourself to your personal audiences".
Slobs don't make money. People who look like they slept in a dumpster don't make money unless they just finished 39 days on an island trying to win a million bucks.
If you brush your teeth to remove bad breath, you are a] doing it wrong. Thats what mouth wash and breath mints are for (Seriously, how can you be that dense?) b] the true purpose is to keep your teeth white. Guess what? Society judges you on that subtly. If they are, they you will be able to get things you are seeking easier. Thats "selling yourself to your personal audiences."
Everyone is an attention whore. Even if you seek your own attention.

about three weeks ago
top

How Gygax Lost Control of TSR and D&D

thunderclap Re:Easy (183 comments)

Death Magic it is. None of us knew it at the time.

about three weeks ago
top

A Fictional Compression Metric Moves Into the Real World

thunderclap Re:Bullshit.... (133 comments)

Can you explain in more detail?

I'm not an expert here, but I think the idea is to come up with a single quantifying number that represents the idea that very fast compression has limited utility if it doesn't save much space, and very high compression has limited utility if it takes an extremely long time.

Like, if you're trying to compress a given file, and one algorithm compressed the file by 0.00001% in 14 seconds, another compressed the file 15% in 20 seconds, and the third compressed it 15.1% in 29 hours, then the middle algorithm is probably going to be the most useful one. So why can't you create some kind of rating system to give you at least a vague quantifiable score of that concept? I understand that it might not be perfect-- different algorithms might score differently on different sized files, different types of files, etc. But then again, computer benchmarks generally don't give you a perfect assessment of performance. It just provides a method for estimating performance.

But maybe you have something in mind that I'm not seeing.

A compsci sacred cow being slaughtered. See there is nothing wrong with what you suggested. Thats the reason why the idea was inserted into Silicon valley to begin with. So why the bitching about its usefulness? People who spend time in computing as a whole are a fairly rigid lot. A lot of the have aspergers syndrome which gives them a leg up on coding while taking away their socialization skills. Others think its useless because they would prefer terms that dig deeper into the compression and its velocity. They don't believe any single term could do what they want. Finally. the rest just want to stay where they are in terms of terms and anything new muddies the water for them. However, the article itself gives the best definition as to why others hate it.

It’s hard to convey to a lay audience that one compression algorithm is better than another—you could compress and decompress images, say, with some loss and look for glitches in the resulting image, but they are hard to spot. But metrics for compression algorithms that rate not only the amount of compression but the processing speed, are hard to find . So it asked the consultants it brought in to help develop the original algorithm—Stanford Professor Tsachy Weissman and then-PhD student Vinith Misra—to come up with a metric that could be used to score multiple algorithms and find a winner. (Misra recently graduated and will soon be working on IBM’s Watson project.) It seems that someone would have come up with such a metric by now. But, says Weissman, “there are two communities: the practitioners, who care about running time, and the theoreticians, who care about how succinctly you can represent the data and don’t worry about the complexity of the implementation.” As a result of this split, he says, no one had yet combined, in a single number, a means of rating both how fast and how tightly an algorithm compresses. Misra came up with a formula (photo above), incorporating both. Along with existing benchmarks the formula creates a metric that the show writers tagged the “Weissman Score.” It's not a fictional metric: although it didn’t exist before Misra created it for the show, it works and may soon find use in the real world. “It is essentially the compression ratio and the ratio of the log of the compression time,” Misra explains, “but it then normalizes that number against an industry standard compressor used for the same data. For music, say, we’d use might use FLAC.” (FLAC, or Free Lossless Audio Codec is an open format from the Xiph.org foundation.)

The saddest thing is that it took media to force it out there. People here might say its meaningless but if Stanford teaches it will be and when these people here's friends have grandchildren (because the ratio of posting on slashdot divided by the propensity of being a neck-beard also leads to a number used to determine your reproductive likelihood) who graduate Compsci it will be as common as SLOC, Halstead complexity measures & Cyclomatic complexity.

about three weeks ago
top

For Now, UK Online Pirates Will Get 4 Warnings -- And That's It

thunderclap Re:So the idea is that.... (143 comments)

No one honestly believes that they will get sued for billions and billions.

about a month ago
top

Sony Forgets To Pay For Domain, Hilarity Ensues

thunderclap Re: Black hole? (277 comments)

I did and it wasn't. You know you could put a link to the actual legislation that you believe was amended.

about 1 month ago
top

Sony Forgets To Pay For Domain, Hilarity Ensues

thunderclap Re: Black hole? (277 comments)

Okay, are you suggesting that accurate reporting to ICANN is covered by the Trademark act? The point I made was the bill he offered and promoted as a refutation was never a law because it died in committee. If you have the other acts name please share

about a month ago
top

Sony Forgets To Pay For Domain, Hilarity Ensues

thunderclap Re:Black hole? (277 comments)

No, there isn't. There is a dead and now archived House resolution.

This bill was introduced on May 12, 2004, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted. The text of the bill below is as of Jun 09, 2004 (Reported by House Committee).

It was never signed into law as it never made it out of committee. That link you so nicely offer up also offres this:

H.R. 3754 (108th): Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act Introduced: Feb 03, 2004 (108th Congress, 2003–2004) Status: Died (Reported by Committee) in a previous session of Congress

How about this one. Its currently alive. S. 2588: Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2014

about a month ago
top

Sony Forgets To Pay For Domain, Hilarity Ensues

thunderclap Re: Black hole? (277 comments)

Originally I haven't planned on entering this but when I clicked the link I got this.

This bill was introduced on May 12, 2004, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.The text of the bill below is as of Jun 09, 2004 (Reported by House Committee).

To be clear this means president Bush never signed it into law. It also means, that as it isn't a law the other person is right unless you can find one that was. As for SonyOnline.net the best thing would be a redirect to Piratebay.se

about a month ago
top

Aereo Embraces Ruling, Tries To Re-Classify Itself As Cable Company

thunderclap Re:Idiots (147 comments)

No, they do not need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the Internet age. They need to be dragged into the street, forced to kneel then shot with ar-15 so many times you can see light through them. They are actively destroying innovation that could have made them money, us more content and convenience as well as promoted our culture. So the best thing at this point is destruction and replacement. If Aereo finally forces them to offer ala carte then so be it.

about a month ago
top

Aereo Embraces Ruling, Tries To Re-Classify Itself As Cable Company

thunderclap Re:It's only fair (147 comments)

oh people can't live without ESPN. All you need is someone willing to pay, willing to pay for a lot of bandwidth, be able to keep it up with all the issues surrounding having a webcam pointed at it and suddenly others don't feel the need to pay a cable company for it.

about a month ago
top

Aereo Embraces Ruling, Tries To Re-Classify Itself As Cable Company

thunderclap Re:It's only fair (147 comments)

I hate to wrench your argument but I live in Houston. The basic basic Comcast tier is $20. Thats $8 more than they were offering. My quess is without all the cruft that we as cable subscribers are forced to pay the bill would be the same as that.

about a month ago
top

Peer Review Ring Broken - 60 Articles Retracted

thunderclap Re:Wish I could say I was surprised (178 comments)

Wrong. The issue is that publishing is considered sufficient.

It should be publish or die. How do you know they're doing anything if they don't publish? they could be watching tv all day for all you know otherwise.

But as is made clear here, simply publishing and getting it through peer review is clearly not good enough. We need to increase what they have to do to avoid this situation.

For example... maybe one scientist pays another scientist to reproduce his work.

Maybe you have big collections of graduate students that as part of their process of getting a degree get assigned some random papers submitted by scientists in their field and they have to reproduce the work.

Obviously this isn't always possible... but whenever it isn't possible that needs to be put as a giant red asterisk on the paper saying "this work has not been reproduced"...

Do that and you're not going to get as much fraud or laziness.

I agree with this for one reason. It would finally dispense with the climate change insanity. Since its actually near impossible to get data that is verifiable about climate older than 50yrs that isn't tainted or limited and subject to interpretation(like core samples or tree rings), we could finally put al gore were he belongs. Out of sight and mind. Each day passing I am more thankful that the supreme court gave the victory to Bush. I only wish it could have happened in 2012 for Romney.

about a month ago
top

Peer Review Ring Broken - 60 Articles Retracted

thunderclap Re:The Good News? (178 comments)

Peter holds a very high standard for himself, I'm sure.

The standard practice is to form a unspoken agreement between several reviewers that they will all favorably review each others papers.

Peter couldn't find his circle and created a self-circle.

Otherwise known as a circle jerk.

about a month ago
top

Tor Project Sued Over a Revenge Porn Business That Used Its Service

thunderclap Re:Why yes, we should blame the victim here (311 comments)

Can we all stop being idiots? Look unless she took those pics with an actual non internet connected camera, she gave implicit permission to post them by taking them with an internet enabled device. People ARE going to Hack your shizz. If you have sensitive info on it, it is your fault that you left it there as well as it is their fault for stealing it. This is today; you don't leave money in an open box on front porch expecting it to remain unmolested. You don't leave your front door unlocked. You don't leave the car keys in the ignition. You don't leave your packages in plain sight at a mall. You don't take pictures of yourself naked for any reason and leave them on an unsecured device and expect it to remain there untouched. Revenge porn is nasty business. It preys on the foolish and ignorant, heartbroken bitches who fuck over men for foolish reasons as well as kind, beatiful souls who were brutalized by dominating thugs mascaraing as men. Its not going away. Anymore than swinging, BDSM, golden showers, chubby chasing, brazzers, vivid, redtube etc are. Yes you have a right to control your images. However ignorance of rule 34 is no excuse. So using common sense says that if you are a prude and don't want the internet to see your quarter sized areolas and shaved puss then delete them. Just like you don't share your bank password, or your social security number online. This is no different. We need to quit treating is a such. No one stole her identity. Had she left it alone it would have faded into nothing. Her insisting on retribution is what is destroying her. Its a good thing. We don't need any more lawyers like her. They tend to go work for places like Prenda.

about a month ago
top

When Beliefs and Facts Collide

thunderclap Re:Not surprising. (725 comments)

Playing devil's advocate. Say the deniers prevent any motion and surprise, surprise 100 yrs rolls around and those predictions failed. In fact very little has changed (other than new orleans flooding via a hurricane and the big one in LA but I digress) will people still sware the science is accurate? No. Those scientists will be stood beside those who believed the earth was the center of the universe, those that believed in aether and that the earth was flat. There is alot of economic damage that can be done with those policies. We need to 100%. And that's the problem. With this science we can't be.

about a month and a half ago
top

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception

thunderclap Re:What about Jehovah's Witnesses? (1330 comments)

No. If you go read the decision, it was narrowly crafted to focus on contraceptives only. And for companies like Hobby Lobby and Conestoga. Basically to get the ability SCOTUS handed Hobby Lobby you need to be: A: A family owned company and only owned by family members. B: for profit but not employee owned (unless family is the only employees) and not publically traded. C: be known for your religious views (the family that owns Hobby Lobby is evangelical, also owns Christian book seller Mardel's and is apart of the people involved with Oral Roberts University) D: Have enough employees that this issue would actually come up (I believe thats over 50 but not sure.) Alito, who crafted the majority opinion, said this doesn't affect other health care items (like your transfusions or the fact that most pills are covered in gelatin made from pork rendering)

about a month and a half ago

Submissions

thunderclap hasn't submitted any stories.

Journals

thunderclap has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>