Announcing: Slashdot Deals - Explore geek apps, games, gadgets and more. (what is this?)

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!



Dayton 2009

tmasssey Re:overclockers, gear heads.... (5 comments)

Remember: I have the license. I know the party line! :)

The types of things you're describing are the things that got me interested in it in the first place. But it's not enough to carry my interest.

For example, QRP interests me. How far can I go on 5W? Sounds cool. But once I build a radio, what do I do with it? Who do I talk to? Now I'm back to the old guys who only want to talk about their signal strength and what gear they're using.

On top of which, AR seems mired in old technology: CW and SSB. Where is the developments? I see *zero* digital--not even 20-year-old packet. I see almost *nothing* outside of HF (CW and SSB) and 2m repeaters. What is exciting about that?

So I still don't get it. I need something to *do* with the radios and antennas I build during the very long stretches of time in between the disasters! And I haven't found *anything* worth actually doing during those times.

I guess that's my question: what do you actually *do* with AR that makes it a worthwhile activity? If the answer is "build radios because I can", then I guess it's just not for me. I would like to actually *use* it for something productive. Every single thing that I could do with AR I can do 50 times easier and cheaper with something else.

I know what the next statement is: "But what will you do when there's no cellular coverage? No phone lines? No power?" I appreciate the value of such skills and resources. And I would like have such skills and resources. But I cannot afford to invest time into a hobby that I *might* use once in my life purposefully, if during the *rest* of the time there is almost nothing to do of even creative value. And that's what I'm looking for: some creative value that can be gotten from AR. After all, you can't spend *all* of your time building radios, right? You do want to actually *use* them, right? :)

more than 5 years ago

Dayton 2009

tmasssey Why Amateur Radio? (5 comments)

I got my license back in December of 2000. I have done virtually *nothing* with it. All I've found is 60-something men sitting around talking about their signal strength... :( I even went to a few meetings of a couple of different local clubs, looking for something interesting to do. It seems that AR stopped innovating in the early 80's. Before the days of cell phones, maybe that was enough to keep interest in the product. But between cell phones (for convenient wireless communications) and the Internet (for instant worldwide communications), what is the appeal of Amateur Radio? What do you (and others) actually do with it?

more than 5 years ago

Brief update: calc, dvm, distributed filesystem

tmasssey What about existing projects? (2 comments)

Wow. It seems the world of distributed file systems is getting crowded. Everyone wants to start one! :)

In addition to the big, established ones (GFS, OCFS2), there are a number in development. A couple I've been following are:

BTRFS: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
POHMELFS: http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projects&item=pohmelfs

I'm sure you've looked at existing projects. Would you mind mentioning why they won't work for you?

more than 6 years ago


tmasssey hasn't submitted any stories.



Inexpensive GPS receiver?

tmasssey tmasssey writes  |  more than 8 years ago Welcome to my first journal entry! I need some gadget advice, and I thought I'd turn to the /. horde for some help.

I'm looking for an inexpensive GPS receiver to carry with me when I'm mountain biking. I don't think I need any fancy features: I'm not looking for navigation, or even maps. I just want something that will track where I've been and when exactly I was there, with minimal fuss. In fact, I'll probably never look at it while I'm out.

Of course, the other part is that I will dump the data into my computer when I'm done, so that I can track my biking: where did I go, how fast did I go over specific areas, etc. *That* is where I'd like the features. The fancier the software for managing all of this, the better. But the GPS device just needs to be simple. And cheap.

Does anyone have any suggestions on a device that would work well for me? Or even devices I should stay away from? Also, any suggestions on software for working with the data? I'm open to both Windows and Linux software. Even OS X would work, though the only Mac I've got is a G3 iMac running Jaguar.

Thank you very much for any help you could give me!

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?