troll -1 (956834) writes "Mice are dichromats, they have only S and M cone pigments. They don't see color too well.
But now researchers at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and
the University of California at Santa Barbara
have successfully transformed their vision by
introducing a single human gene into a mouse chromosome.
Jeremy Nathans, one of the authors of the study, describes it as
'the same evolutionary event that happened in one of the distant ancestors of all primates and that led ultimately to the trichromatic color vision'." top
troll -1 (956834) writes "Lawrence Lessig, a law professor at Stanford, has an op-ed in the NY Times entitled
Make Way for Copyright Chaos which references the Viacom vs YouTube case. What's interesting about this article is that it gives some historical perspective
on copyright law and the courts. Up until Grokster, Lessig says the attitude of the courts was, "if you don't like how new technologies affect copyright, take your problem to Congress." But in the Grokster case the court seemed to rule against the technology itself, cutting Congress out of the picture. He also explains that Viacom is essentially asking the Court to rule against the safe harbor provision of
Title II of the DMCA which apparently protects YouTube and others against liability so long as they make reasonable steps to take down
infringing content at the request of the copyright holder. Lessig doesn't give us any insight into who's going to win but he does conclude that "conservatives on the Supreme Court have long warned" about the dynamic of going against Congress when it comes to copyright." top
troll -1 (956834) writes "According to The Register the Brazilian judge who ordered youtube blocked because of a so-called sex video has reversed himself.
Earlier slashdot story is here.
From the article,
"Sao Paulo state Supreme Court Justice Enio Santarelli Zuliani clearly thinks things have got a bit out of hand, and has accordingly 'asked the companies to unblock the site and let him know why they can't simply prevent the video from being seen'". Apparently the judge doesn't understand how youtube works.
See the video