Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



ISP Liability for COntent - Case

twit Re:First! (And, oh yeah, a response) (80 comments)

I'd think that an ISP is a common carrier, or as close to a common carrier as is possible. While a telephone call doesn't stay in the system as long as a usenet post, I don't think that speed is the defining factor. After all, what about snailmail?

What's more, if Demon takes the responsibility of starting to censor, it's forced to continue to censor at every opportunity; they give up the defense of being a common carrier. Can you imagine facing obscenity charges for every post to No doubt they're itching to be laid. Demon has no choice but to act as if were a common carrier or be once and totally screwed.

more than 15 years ago


twit hasn't submitted any stories.


twit has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?