Apple Disables Trim Support On 3rd Party SSDs In OS X
When I saw the title of the thread I just knew. This behavior is total unacceptable and would be considered anti-competitive if another company did it, but I just knew that this thread would be full of Apple apologists trying to explain that this was OK because Apple. I was right.
What other company would you give a Big Thumbs Up to for refusing to install drivers for third-party hardware because SOME drivers MAY be implemented poorly? Or make it difficult to install a competitor's software? Microsoft? It was a major scandal that they INCLUDED their own software (IE), let alone if they were to actively suppress the competition's.
The Downside to Low Gas Prices
There is no downside to lower gas prices. lower prices on anything is always a positive.
we as a group are saving billions a day after a very long recession. The gas prices are still not low enough to help those who need it most, the poor and lower middle class.
Not entirely true as a long term downtrend in overall prices (deflation) is a huge drag on an economy as people put off purchases waiting for things to get cheaper. This leads to a lower volume of products being made (and fewer jobs making them) and slower innovation. In the PC world you sometimes see people skipping a generation (or two) of graphics adapters just for that reason, but fortunately not enough to have a real impact. Now imagine that behavior applied to every tangible good that people buy. You have a less "wasteful" society as things aren't thrown away as quickly, but you also have a market in which a new or improved product, after selling through the early adopters, has few buyers and may never get mainstream adoption. No demand for new products means less R&D into making them and slower innovation. Why waste the money?
As far as lower gas and oil prices, that is HUGE. Like $40,000,000,000 huge according to this (and several other) articles:
Falling Gas Prices Could Provide $40 Billion Boost to Economy
Just how big of a boost can lower gas prices provide? Joseph LaVorgna and Brett Ryan, economists at Deutsche Bank, offered one answer in a note to clients Tuesday. “According to our calculations, every one cent annual change in gasoline prices is worth approximately $1 billion in annual U.S. household energy consumption,” he wrote. “The bottom line is that if the current 40 cent decline in energy costs is maintained, then consumer cash flow would improve by roughly $40 billion; this is equivalent to almost three-tenths on annualized GDP growth.”
Just how much of that extra money consumers actually spend on goods and services may depend in part on how confident they are that the economy and job market will continue to improve. But with stagnant wages still holding back consumer spending, every extra dollar will help.
Most people pushing for a higher gas tax to "save the highway fund" really care most about increasing the price of gas for "environmental reasons". If they really just cared about saving the highway fund then they would propose means of funding it that applied the burden either equally on ALL PEOPLE as all people benefit from the highways whether they use them directly or not, or on EVERYONE WHO USES THEM regardless of the type of fuel/batteries they use to motivate their vehicles. This is just the opposite of what they want though. Their true cause is to use the highway fund problems as an excuse to raise the gas tax to punish the troglodytes who still use gasoline-powered cars. Most of these people would be perfectly happy with a low- or no-growth economy since that would slow carbon emission growth.
Slower growth in carbon emissions, gas burning troglodytes punished, electric car owners pay less than their Fair Share for highway use. Win-win-win!
Washington Dancers Sue To Prevent Identity Disclosure
I bet there are quite a few people arguing that this is a Bad Thing here but were all in favor of the New York fiasco of publishing maps to the homes of people with firearms permits, because it was after all, you know, "public record".
Mayday PAC Goes 2 For 8
We put a lazy absentee senator (Pat Roberts) back in because the Democrats dropped out of the race to support an "independent" that out 'cratted the Democrats, bobbled his head when he talked and avoided taking a stand on any issue that might show him to be a Democrat in disguise. Honestly, he must've thought the state were simple peasant rubes.
Well, of course he did. All national Democrats do. At least the national Democrat party perspective is that everyone between the two coasts (except Chicago) are a bunch of rubes. It's "fly-over country", after all. Nothing there is important except every other November.
Undersized Grouper Case Lands In Supreme Court
Nevermind the consequences if they limit the meaning -- it will be legal to destroy most kinds of evidence in a criminal investigation. It's all A-OK if it didn't contain financial records right? Right?
Considering that Sarbane-Oxley is supposed to be about financial crimes and that destruction of evidence is already illegal under other statutes, then yes. Charge people under the statute that actually logically applies, not the one that gives the steepest penalties.
This is as stupid as charging two 18-year-olds under RICO laws because there was a "conspiracy" as the two of them drove around looking for someone to buy them liquor.
Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo Crashes
We can't forget that space flight is a challenging, dangerous, risky affair for private industry as well as governments. It will be interesting to see how the private side deals with these setbacks.
It is hard. I don't mean to sound flippant, but the comparison to "rocket science" (or rocket surgery) is made for a reason. People forget that sometimes and just take it for granted. I think Science Fiction movies have a lot to do with that. We see how easy it is there and don't realize that IRL how lucky we were that we lost only two Space Shuttles.
Italian Supreme Court Bans the 'Microsoft Tax'
Can I get a refund for my Mac OS too?
No. To summarize all of the apologists below, Because Apple.
Mars Orbiter Beams Back Images of Comet's Surprisingly Tiny Nucleus
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a Boom tomorrow.
Apple Doesn't Design For Yesterday
So what's so "tomorrow" about change from Lucida to Helvetica, which impedes legibility, requires more screen space, and makes the GUI appear fuzzy? Is that the definition of "tomorrow" now?
The real answer, of course, is Because Apple Did It.
The rest of the arguments here are an attempt to justify it.
Lockheed Claims Breakthrough On Fusion Energy Project
Why stop at 100 MWs? You need...
First Shellshock Botnet Attacking Akamai, US DoD Networks
I'm at a loss for words - other than that seems offensive, even for non-politically-correct me.
That's only for the PC crowd. This is Linux.
FBI Chief: Apple, Google Phone Encryption Perilous
I would say that speaking like that will get you on an NSA watch list, except we're already all on NSA watchlists.
If you've ever used TOR you are.
Russian Military Forces Have Now Invaded Ukraine
The 70's called. They want to know what we thought was wrong with their foreign policy.
Underground Experiment Confirms Fusion Powers the Sun
I think (hope) you mean "fallacy"...
Underground Experiment Confirms Fusion Powers the Sun
Obvious is different from proven.
For Microsoft, $93B Abroad Means Avoiding $30B Tax Hit
They aren't paying for any protection provided by the US.
So... The US should be able to tax foreign companies on their income earned in foreign companies because of the general protection and stability that the US provides (or at least use to provide) to the world in general? Aren't they "freeloading" too? "If you want to sell in the United States we get to tax your global profits?" Is that what you want?
China Pulls Plug On Genetically Modified Rice and Corn
With AdBlock and NoScript you don't see any of that crap. X10 pretty much started it in the late 90's and it's pretty much gone downhill ever since.
When I first started using those tools I wanted to only block the bad actors, but I quickly found that pretty much everybody was bad to some degree. Now with malware attacks through served ads I don't understand why anyone wouldn't be using these tools.
Checking the "reward" box from SlashDot to turn off ads doesn't change a thing that I see.
News Aggregator Fark Adds Misogyny Ban
Some of the stuff on Jezebel might cross that line occasionally.
Solar Plant Sets Birds On Fire As They Fly Overhead
Oops. Math error. Divide all of my numbers by 365.
So only about 1.5 to 2 million birds (BrightSource) to 46 million (green group) to 145 million (government).
Solar Plant Sets Birds On Fire As They Fly Overhead
I think it's funny that BrightSource's bird kill numbers are being trusted when they say 1,000 per year. This story says that "federal wildlife investigators" are estimating one "streamer" every two minutes on average. That would be 240 per day assuming 8 hours of operation. The Center for Biological Diversity estimates 28,000 per year. That's only about 76 per day.
The Exxon Valdez spill killed (from my quick search) an estimated 200,000 to 300,000 birds, about what this would kill in 10 years or so at mid-20k birds killed per year. So, build 10 of these plants (or larger with even more roasting capacity) and you have the equivalent (in bird deaths) of an Exxon Valdez oil spill each year. A wise sage once said "It's not easy being green."
If this were a coal or oil source quoting bird kills, would people be so willing to accept their numbers at face value? BrightSource is wanting to build a much larger plant right in a migratory corridor. They have a strong incentive to lie about the numbers.
Also, if you want to compare birds killed here to birds killed by "dirty" energy, scale this ONE complex's Kill per Megawatt up from its (planned) capacity of 392 MW to that of what you're comparing to. Assuming that the plant generates power 8 hours per day year round at 100%, you get about 3.2 GWh of electricity. A search found that for 2010 in the US coal power production was a bit larger than that at 1,994,000 GWh. So, multiply the bird kills by over 600,000 (1,994,000 / 3.2) and you can now compare the kills scaled for power generated. That would be scaling to over 600 million birds by BrightSource numbers and about 17 billion by the environmental group's numbers. The "federal wildlife investigator's" numbers would yield somewhere around 53 billion. I wonder how much coal could be saved by just burning 53 billion birds each year instead...
Don't forget to add in the tortoise habit that was damaged to build this too. I'm trying to think of the name of the thin, extremely fragile layer of crust on undisturbed desert ground that environmental groups want to shut down land so people won't walk on it. (It isn't Desert Varnish. That's what's on rocks.) It takes forever for it to recover. All gone on that six-and-a-quarter square mile site.
But on the bright side, ha ha, at least the owls are safe.
wallsg hasn't submitted any stories.
wallsg has no journal entries.