Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!



Lame Duck Challenge Ends With Free Codeweavers Software For All

wetelectric Am I the only one.. (433 comments)

who has no use for the program but downloaded it anyway because it was free? /me gets his coat

more than 5 years ago



The IT Recruitment Agent Nightmare

wetelectric wetelectric writes  |  about 6 years ago

wetelectric (956671) writes ""Working as a .NET software consultant in UK, I spent ages with the IT recruiting agents on the phone and had suffered their tricks. So, in this post, I thought of educating my software consultant colleagues of the agents' sneaky tricks and dodgy tactics.

Recruiting agents, especially in the current credit crunch, are having less 'productive' work to do due to the reduced demands in the market, so they are spending more time wasting our "software consultants" time and resources rather than doing their actual role which is, obviously, recruiting!""

Link to Original Source

Raadt - That whole "Linux stealing our code

wetelectric wetelectric writes  |  about 7 years ago

wetelectric (956671) writes "GPL fans said the great problem we would face is that companies would take our BSD code, modify it, and not give back. Nope — the great problem we face is that people would wrap the GPL around our code, and lock us out in the same way that these supposed companies would lock us out. Just like the Linux community, we have many companies giving us code back, all the time. But once the code is GPL'd, we cannot get it back. — Theo de Raadt"
Link to Original Source

UK Gov seeks 'scientific' basis for nationality

wetelectric wetelectric writes  |  more than 7 years ago

wetelectric (956671) writes "Attempts to define race through science haven't had an entirely positive press subsequent to the collapse of the Third Reich, but the Weird Science Department of the UK Government could well be skittering on that very patch of thin ice. Lord Triesman, the Prime minister's Special Envoy for Returns, this week said that work on the "scientific and technical identification of nationality" will be "an important tool" to be used for the return of illegal immigrants to their countries of origin."

wetelectric wetelectric writes  |  more than 7 years ago

wetelectric (956671) writes "The first night I arrived at the protest against the Second Life headquarters of Front National, the far right French political party of Jean-Marie Le Pen, it was ringed on all sides by protesters with signs to wave and statements to distribute. By the second night I came (this was late last week), the conflict had become more literal, for many Residents had armed themselves. Multi-colored explosions and constant gunfire shredded the air of Porcupine, a shopping island which FN had inexplicably picked for the site of their virtual world HQ, in December.
— Second life makes jeebus cry."

wetelectric wetelectric writes  |  more than 7 years ago

wetelectric (956671) writes "UK government Response to software patents — 'epetition':
The Government remains committed to its policy that no patents should exist for inventions which make advances lying solely in the field of software. Although certain jurisdictions, such as the US, allow more liberal patenting of software-based inventions, these patents cannot be enforced in the UK. The test used to discern between patentable and non-patentable subject matter in the UK has recently been clarified by the courts, and is applied rigorously by the Patent Office. Under this test, the true nature of the advance being claimed in a patent application must be determined, and if this advance lies solely in the field of software, or another non-technical field such as methods of doing business, the patent will not be granted. If the advance being made by an invention does lie in a technical field, it must also be non-obvious and sufficiently clearly described for the invention to be reproduced before a patent will be granted by the Patent Office. The recently published Gowers Review of Intellectual Property, an independent review commissioned by the Government, recommended that patent rights should not be extended to cover pure software, business methods and genes. The Government will implement those recommendations for which it is responsible, and will therefore continue to exclude patents from areas where they may hinder innovation: including patents which are too broad, speculative, or obvious, or where the advance they make lies in an excluded area such as software."


wetelectric has no journal entries.

Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?