NPR: '80s Ads Are Responsible For the Lack of Women Coders
Correct, you aren't a feminist. News flash: women have brains and they do what they want. They don't want to code, because they are passively (mostly) discouraged from pursuing that hobby/career. Deal with it.
Favorite clickbait hook?
This, a thousand times this. I am a doctor in real life and so is my wife. It's amazing how many of her HIV/AIDS patients just do not take their medicines. There's no reason HIV/AIDS should be as prevalent in the US as it is. Then there are the idiots that don't take their antibiotics. You have a genetic mutation that makes you immunocompromised... Why aren't you taking your antibiotics? Argh!
And before you ask, no, it's neither cost-related nor side effects that prevent them from taking their meds. In these cases, at least. The people I'm talking about are just... frustrating.
Scanning Embryos For Super-Intelligent Kids Is On the Horizon
Scanning Embryos For Super-Intelligent Kids Is On the Horizon
Is 15 IQ points really a meaningful difference "in the real world'?
Now we can get back to to the slippery slope. What about killing off girl embryos or blacks or obese, etc etc.
The Great Robocoin Rip-off
Why the Trolls Will Always Win
Or you know, the majority of us could be actual good guys (and gals) and actually do something to fight back against this horrid behavior...
Misogyny, Entitlement, and Nerds
Women are human beings. And YOU are an ass. There, fixed that for you.
Orca Identified As 103 Years Old
As someone who used to work with research mice A LOT, I can tell you that captive mice (yes, the normal "wild-type" mice) are considered very old after 18 months, but in the wild they live around 4 years. My theory is that the real wild-type mice, ie the ones out in the field, get lots of excercise and have reduced caloric intake. The captive research mice have all the food and water they could ever want 24/7 and live in tiny boxes with no exercise wheel. Yes, the captive mice don't get diabetes or atherosclerosis, but they're still not living as long...
Either that, or they're so inbred it makes GoT seem tame!
Women Increasingly Freezing Their Eggs To Pursue Their Careers
Not sure if joking or trolling, but you're an asshole either way. Attending to career so they can provide well for the child doesn't seem like procrastinating to me. It sounds like good and reasonable planning.
Intuit, Maker of Turbotax, Lobbies Against Simplified Tax Filings
That, and their customer support is really awful (the actual software is mediocre). It doesn't handle moving states to change jobs very well. It kept trying to slap me with an entire year's worth of taxes for one state. Customer support was non-existent (see numerous Intuit fora).
If I could revisit / re-run a chunk of my schooling:
I think answers like this border on asinine. We're in a recession with double-digit unemployment. How easy would it be for him to find another job? If the curreny job really is malignant, then how likely is it a positive letter of recommendation will come from them? Relocation costs money. Uprooting the family is a drain on happiness. In all likelihood, the wife/mom is probably employed too. You'd need to find two jobs in the same locale.
It's easy to just say "go get another job" but it's another thing entirely to pull off.
One-Way Sound Walls Proven Possible
Sounds like a good use for interrogation rooms...
Does China's Cyber Offense Obscure Woeful Defense?
I wonder why China never thought of securing their systems more tightly. Surely they must have realized that retaliation would come their way at some point, no? I mean, aside from the fact secure systems are usually preferably to ones that are not...
Why Science Is a Lousy Career Choice
Quit your (please learn the difference betwen your and you're) bitchin'. What type of school are you talking about? I've seen medical school stats and white males are in 3rd place behind Asians and white females in GPA and test scores. That probably holds true for most other types of schools, as well. And yet...white males are pretty much the major group at most medical schools, corporations, hospitals, etc. I am a white male and not a minority, BTW.
Why Science Is a Lousy Career Choice
As a relatively young MD/PhD student I've noticed that there are relatively few Americans in any of the PhD programs at my university. My perspective is from the biomedical sciences, but still. Most are Chinese or Indian students and most of the American students are already planning for industry, consulting, or some other non-research job.
I would also add that e) stressing about writing grants every few years and progress reports for those grants every year - is a deterrent for continuing a career in science.
Between Christmas and New Year's, I'll take ...
If you're really Jewish, you probably know Chanukkah isn't a big deal in terms of Jewish holidays. The fact that it occurs around Christmas time in a heavily-Christian-influenced society has moved it towards the generally meaningless, consumer-driven holiday it is now. Real Jews don't taint their important holidays with that crap (see Yom Kippur and Rosh Hashana).
Skunk Ruins Toys for Poor Children
Antivirus Firms Short-Changing Customers
Sure sounds like some kind of phishing scam to me! What are we paying these companies for again?
How much TV do you watch in a week, on average?
I agree to a point, but TV is so central to the US way of life that you're somewhat deficient in cultural literacy if you don't watch TV. Therefore, I maximize my, uh... "education" by watching TV shows about other TV shows like The Soup and TMZ. That, plus the internet allows me the appearance of watching TV 8 hours a day while still working 70+ hours a week. :)
The Problem With the Top500 Supercomputer List
Is there a useful purpose for this list in the first place? It isn't likely to useful to THAT many people...
People are still idiots
I wrote in my journal a while ago that I thought people were generally idiots. I think this is becoming truer every day. It must be the residual effects of the substandard education system here accumulating. The current hub-bub about the current healthcare/healthplan crisis makes this painfully evident. You have people showing up in town halls spouting off about things they know nothing about. You have people showing up with pictures of Obama made up to look like Hitler (Godwin's Law in real life!). You have people showing up with assault rifles for Pete's sake! Some of the more level-headed idiots start their comments off with things like "Well, I'm not an expert but..." or "I'm not a doctor but I think that..." and then they proceed to tell about how granny is going to be executed by death squads or that they won't be able to see their own doctors anymore. Sheer madness! Doesn't anyone think critically anymore?
I also recently read an article about a primary care physician explaining why he hates his job. It basically amounted to getting paid peanuts for trying to save the healthcare system tens of thousands of dollars... and this is just one guy. Hmmm.... more work for less money, but more frustration? No wonder there's a primary care shortage! Someone in the comments section of that article posted something to the effect of "Quit yer bitchin'! There's people out there that's makin' just minimum wage or worse, unemployed." Point taken, good sir. However, do you really think that a doctor, who excelled in high school, college, paid hundreds of thousands of dollar to be in medical school, and then went on to make $6-7 an hour as a resident for the next 3-7 years (doing and important job, no less) doesn't deserve a good living? I mean, sure there are people in minimum wage jobs, but are you really equating a burger flipper to a doctor? I like my burgers, don't get me wrong, but I still think a doctor is a bit more important to society than the guy manning the fryolater. Don't forget, that these doctors have student loan payments upwards of $2000 per month. Don't forget they have to pay malpractice insurance premiums on top of that. You can go head and subtract a good $40-50k from a doctor's salary already. Oh yeah, did I mention that doctor's get bumped up to a higher tax bracket so a lot of the tax breaks disappear? Did I mention they don't make enough money to commit what is essentially tax evasion like the uber-rich? Frankly, people that are criticizing doctors need to drink a great big mug of STFU.
Penultimately, I've heard talk about replacing doctors with nurse practitioners or something to that effect, since then you'll need to just pay a nurse's salary not a doctor's. Remember that expensive malpractice insurance premium? Guess who's going to have to cover that when you put the nurses in charge? You think they're going to settle for a paycut to work more hours? At best they may make a little more, but they'll still be working their butts off. Nevermind they receive less medical training and run the risk being sued into oblivion. You think healthcare costs are going to go down then? Better lay off the whippets, duuuuude.
Lastly, I've heard that doctors can spend up to the 50% of their time dealing with insurance companies. Wouldn't you like your 10-15 minute visit to be 20-30 minutes? Maybe we should line up the insurance execs against the wall. They recently testified in congress they would still continue denying people's claims based on past medical history, no matter how absurd. A recent "This American Life" podcast had a nurse with a nasty, invasive breast cancer. A day or two before the surgery, the insurance company said they wouldn't pay because a dermatology report had something in it. Pre-existing medical condition = no surgery for you. Nevermind that dermatologist report contained a case of acne. Nevermind the fact that the dermatologist himself begged the company not to deny her the surgery based on acne. Nevermind the fact that acne has nothing to do with breast cancer.
What's so bad about "socialized" medicine again?
P.S. Check out single-payer healthcare.
We now know that just by living together in a society, we've altered human culture. You used to go directly from childhood to adulthood; there was no such thing as adolscence back in the caveman days. Now that we live in cities and such, you develop into a biologically mature adult, but culturally/socially you are not. This is probably contributes to the rebelliousness of teenagers. If we created a whole set of people/culture on accident, can it be done on purpose?
My personal crackpot theory is that television causes ADD/ADHD. All those commercials interrupting programs every few minutes, all those video games with their zany graphics and flashing colors have destroyed our ability to handle any thoughts for an arbitrarily long amount of time. In addition to the attention-span problem, television probably hinders our ability to think at all! This isn't supposed to be a diatribe against television, but is there some way we could use television, video games, radio shows, music, etc to engineer a culture? Maybe we should use these "tools" to eradicate racism. At the very least, we could subdue it a little.
Despite the best efforts of activists, racism still exists and doesn't seem to be getting any better after hitting a plateau. On the other hand, homosexual acceptance seems to be making headway. Let's learn something from that. We could also extend these tactics to generate a more sympathetic culture, in general. Wouldn't that be nice? Despite the Orwellian-esque auroa, it still seems better than putting Prozac into the water supply, which gets my vote personally.
Theory of Conservative Idiocy
So I was reading this article and I started thinking about how some people have proposed that political affiliation and intelligence are related (that chart is bogus by the way). What leaped out at me was the woman who said something to the effect of I'm used to being underrepreseted as a conservative. My reaction was: Are you fucking kidding me? Are you so dumb and dense that you don't realize that Republicans have captured the Presidency, the Senate, and the House? Dumbass! The article claims she is 27 years old and from Florida (maybe that's why she's dumber than a sack of hammers? Just kidding!). So in the past 30 years we've had 20 years of republican presidents: Ford, Reagan, GH Bush, and GW Bush. Of course, in 2008 that will be 25 years of republican presidents in 35 years. How can you call that being underrepresented? That's what really got me thinking about intelligence and politics. I'd always thought of Republicans as the "old" party and the Democrats as the "younger crowd." This woman was a 27 year old Republican. How bizarre. Anyway, if age isn't a function of political affiliation then maybe it is intelligence. I haven't been able to find any statistics, but there seems to be no end to anecdotal evidence that America's students are doing more poorly every year when compared to other countries. If it wasn't, then why'd GW make such a big deal out of "No Chlid Left Behind?" So is the sudden surge of conservatism due to the drop in education/intelligence of the American voter? There was record turnout for the 2004 elections and the conservatives clearly won (despite the protest of some particularly loud liberals, re: voter fraud, etc):
Bush won again despite record deficit spending and Iraq (by this time, the thrill of victory had pretty much been replaced by the terror of daily attack on US soldiers and Iraqi civilians).
Voters all across America voted on legislation to define marriage as between only a man and a woman.
Republicans ended up with 51 senators (out of 100).
They also got 227 Congressman (out of 435).
There are also 28 Republican governors (out of 50).
Not too shabby, eh?
So did the Republicans win because most Americans are now idiots? Well, the punk/rock band Green Day did release an album titled "American Idiot." More and more kids are entering college without basic skills. Bill Gates even said so in this speech. Perhaps kids and adults that lack critical thinking skills gravitate towards the conservative end. I'm not saying that all Republicans are stupid. I'm saying that their voting base is. Is that why Republicans really don't give a crap about education? The teachers don't think that they do. As the Republicans keep getting stronger, expect education and social services to drop. If my little crackpot theory is true, then it really IS in the best interests of Republican politicians to keep the population dumb and clueless. Of course, at a certain point some backlash will hopefully set things right.
I'm such an optimist!
I was reading an older article listing the amounts of aid pledged by various countries and organizations. Even though the U.S. had only pledged a stingy $35(USD), it was still the greatest amount by quite a bit. The freaking UN and World Bank were both giving less! Even as of this writing, the U.S. is still pledging the third highest amount behind Japan and Germany. This, on top of a recession and major military operations in two foriegn countries. regardless of whether or not you agree with the policy or morality of these little wars, you still have to admit that they're pretty costly. Never mind official U.S. government expenditures. U.S. citizens have raised over $300M(USD)!!! I don't have any numbers to back this up, but I feel pretty confident in claiming that's the most. Remember: that's over $300M of actual money. None of this pledging nonsense.
Another thing about which I would like to rant, are the idiots who criticize the NOAA for not warning countries of the impending tsunami. It's a Pacific Ocean warning system, you asswipes! They have a system to warn Pacific countries, which means they can't warn Indian Ocean countries. What are they supposed to do? Phone a bunch of people? Who are they going to phone? Would anyone on the other end believe them? NOAA notified Australia in the hopes they could do something, but what else could they do? To the countried who say they're too poor to have an early warning system installed: So is it cheaper to just repair the damage after tsunamis? Before you call ME an insensitive asshole, I would just like to remind you that this is not the first tsunami to hit the Indian Ocean. It may be the most deadly, but it is not the first. What really floors me, is the U.S. has a Pacific system, but not one for the Atlantic! As if these things don't happen in the Atlantic!
--- I wouldn't be xanthines if I didn't have some criticism of the U.S. so here goes! ---
I think America needs to actually help build areas devastated by the tsunami. I say build and not rebuild because most of these places were pretty impoverished already. More children die every year in this region from dehydration because of the lack of irrigation, modern plumbing, and water treatment facilities. Of course, this is spread out over a year so it isn't nearly as dramatic as a tsunami. However, they are just as dead and their suffering was spread out over an extended period of time. If you split the math up, it's still a kid every 15 seconds or as one commentator put it: try imagining 20 jumbojets full of kids crashing into the ground every day. Instead of just giving temporary aid, the U.S. should invest in the infrastructure necessary to support the local populace. If done correctly, this could greatly curtail the spread of anti-Americanism in muslim countries (FYI, a lot people in the region are muslim). The right propaganda could do waaay more to combat extremist terrorism than the current military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq could ever hope to achieve.
So in summary:
1. Fuck off, Jan Egeland.
2. Hey you fucktards in Washington, DC: Use my taxes to actually stop international terrorism, instead of making it worse.
Age of Enlightenment, The Second
So we now live in a world where religion is trumping science, the Christians are back to cleansing the Middle of East of Muslims, and anyone voicing opposition are denounced and sometimes jailed (perhaps indefinitely!!!). This really sounds like we're back in in the Dark Ages. In the grand scheme of things, the intellectuals have generally had it tough. Well, it's time to fight back! We have become too complacent, always believing that reason will always triumph over stupidity because it's logical. Not true! We live in a relatively civil society so you don't have to bash in anyone's brains, but for Logic's sake! -- fight stupidity whenever it raises its ugly head. You don't have to be snotty or mean, but don't just sit back and do nothing. Write to your congressman. Write to your newspaper. Speak out to your friends and enemies. Logical reasoning won't triumph over religion by being academic. It's war for the development of civilization. So do your part and fight for logic and reason and knowledge, otherwise you're nothing more than a draft-dodger. It's time to start another Age of Enlightenment!
"...all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
This may sound overly cynnical or pessimistic so brace yourself...
I don't think rights exist at all. They are figments of our imagination. Well, that's a bit pejorative. Maybe they're more like dreams or wishes. Wishes sounds best. To me, rights are implicitly guaranteed. Nothing I've ever read in the US Constiution, UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (or whatever its proper title is), or anything else has declared a right that is guaranteed. Life, liberty,and the pursuit of happiness (formerly property, but TJ thought that was too uncouthe) can all be taken away fairly easily. Very easily in the case of life (think about how efficient humanity has become at extinguishing life!).
Instead, rights just seems to be a word that is used to denote laws or rules that we consider a little more important. If you break the law you go to jail; repress some rights and you're a monster. Why are life and liberty considered rights? There are laws governing homicide/bodily harm and slavery. We say that laws protect these rights, but why do we say that? Shouldn't laws be protecting people? You might say that even though rights are suppressed, that because they ARE rights all efforts must be directed towards reversing such a transgression. It seems that is usually the case anyway with heinous crimes. I guess rights are considered to be "above the law" in the sense they can't be erased or altered.
In that case, how is something in a un-ammend-able constitution any different? Nothing is guaranteed, although some things SHOULD be. I think most reasonable people would agree.
So are there any "real" rights? The only one that's close is to think. According to Descartes "We thinks therefore we's is." There isn't anything anyone can do to really prevent me from thinking. If one should club me upside the head and I lose conciousness (whether by concussion or death) I would cease to exist. How can someone have rights if they don't exist? Of course, you could counter that a baby brought up not to think could be possible. I would counter that the baby never really lived at all. Instead it would be just a lump of biological goo. But then we start to think "What IS life?" which is a whole other topic of discussion.!
In case you hadn't caught that, passing ammendments IS changing the constitution.
I used to think elitists were full of themselves, but everyday I'm agreeing with them more and more. It's really hard when people do and say stupid things like that.
I think part of my fondness for Vivaldi lies in his efforts for the underdog. He appeared to be particularly passionate, even for a priest. He taught music at an all-girls orphanage which was pretty cool, since girls weren't allowed to do very much. In fact, they had to perform behind screens to keep their identities hidden. I think that's great because music is a wonderful thing, and he was able to give that to girls who had practically nothing.
Another underdog that Vivaldi served was the bassoon. It's a big wooden instrument that is fairly difficult to play. It's kind of featured instrument playing when the broomsticks come alive during Disney's Fantasia. It's Italian name is fagotti which, of course draws snickers and giggles from the junior high band members. Although Vivaldi wasn't the first person to write music for the bassoon, he probably wrote the first great pieces of music for it. Most people think the basson sounds weird, but I think it's pretty neat. Definitely unique.
So Happy Birthday, Vivaldi. It's too bad you never lived to see your creations played in the greatest concert halls in the world (regrettably, he was an example of the proto-typical musician dying before knowing how great he was).
I feel I must retort.
Sure, only 3% of research has turned into useful stuff, but how long of a time frame are talking about? I mean, Kepler came up with his laws of planetary motion 400 years ago. Now what possible use could a law like that be waaay back then. Of course, now that we can send things to other planets, we know that laws governing planetary are immensley useful. So even though researchers may be doing useless thing now like sequencing the mosquito genome or learning about M&M's shaking in barrels, we should keep in mind that the results from these efforts might one day save our lives.
A lot of times, people say that an argument is purely academic or only works in theory. Well, maybe not for long.
Man, do we live in a nation of sexually repressed prudes! Out of all the things to try and prosecute, they want to prevent porn. In my opinion there are a bunch of other criminals I'd like to see prosecuted first: drug dealers, mobsters, and of course, the insidious Martha Stewart. But no, we have to prevent teenagers and lonely men from masturbating all day.
It seems like America is particularly concerned with porn than most other countries (Janet Jackson/CBS anyone?). I think this may be because of our Puritanical roots. Who do think was on the Mayflower! We started a country based on a culture that has very conservative/strict rules regarding sexuality. Of course, over time we have managed to cast off the goody-goody shackles, but there still those lingering bits of institution lying about stirring up trouble. Take this year's SuperBowl "incident" involving Janet Jackson. Jackson's boob in all its glory was shown on broadcast television for everyone to see. This was apparently only on for a very very short time, but many people managed a peek. And of course, EVERYONE got to see it during the endless replays that assaulted you everywhere you turned. Not long after, a woman sued Jackson and CBS for billions of dollars for injury or something like that. Now how did her boob actually injure anyone? It's not like her nipple poked out anyone's eye.
I really think that if porn were just let loose, we would of course have a deulge of boobies and pee-pees everywhere, but in the following weeks I'm sure it would die down. As a consequence the mystique and taboo of sex will disappear. I mean, it's not like trying to legalize drugs which are addictive. It's sex/sexuality. It's somewhat natural (I'm not sure if the world's biggest gangbang is natural) so what's the big deal? If anything, our vulgar language will lose its shock value (it's interesting to note that the majority of our curse words involve sex: fuck, motherfucker, dickhead, cuntface, etc etc). We'll release a collective sexual tension and most people will probably be a lot happier.
Of course the uberconservative won't be, but then again they had their chance to run the country 200 years ago.
Now before you get all huffy about piping up to defend my coworker, he's been in hot water for months because of his cluelessness. He's a nice guy and has the potential to be a good worker, but he can't prioritize or focus so ends up getting nothing significant done.
So don't feel too bad for him!
As time goes on, we seem to be creating problems as well as solutions (adolescent issues, privacy issues, etc). I'm wondering if anxiety disorders are a figment of society.
These days people have phones, TV, internet, faxes, instant messenger and whatnot so it's really no wonder that people can't interact with each other in real life. In fact, the problem might just worsen as these things start penentrating younger populations, with the endorsement of the parents no less! So are drugs the answer? I'm pretty sure that some people have a biochemical imbalance that puts them at a disadvantage or something else like stuttering, but anxiety?
But that can't be the entire problem. The countries with the highest technology pervasiveness (ie Japan, Korea) don't appear to have problems. Of course, I don't live in those countries and can't speak antything but English... So is it the combination of the American citizen's solitary trends with technology? I mean, we Americans just hate it when those foreigners stand so close to use while they're talking, right? It's just creepy. We also have the most skewed perspective on privacy (every American thinks privacy is an absolute right, despite the absence of such a clause in The Constitution).
Since psychiatrists must prescribe such drugs as Paxil and whatever, they are the gatekeepers. So let's look at them for a moment. How do they decide who gets these drugs, in a general way. I'm sure there all kinds of technical criteria, but let's keep it understandable for now. There seem to be two main situations that justify prescribing psychiatric drugs: 1. Someone is a danger to themselves and/or society OR 2. They are deviant from the social norm somehow that prevents them from leading productive lives. It is this second situation that seems generate demand for anti-anxiety drugs. If enough people start to have anxiety problems, then do the smooth-talkers become people that need drugs? The obvious answer is that just because a majority is exhibiting symptoms doesn't mean it it desirable by definition (ie If everyone jumped off a bridge, would you?). So what's the deal?
I think that pills or drugs or whatever have become a sort of magic solution to problems ever since the discovery of antibiotics. The next big thing was probably Prozac for clinically depressed. It seemed that pills could cure us of microbial maurauders or the blues. So now we have drugs for impotence (arguably a real medical problem, I conceed, but come on!), anxiety, depression, and all kinds of things once considered non-medical. Again, some people have real biochemical issues that can be corrected by drugs, but I fear that people with social problems as opposed to "biochemical problems manifested by social awkwardness" will get these drugs unnecessarily. Don't forget; all these drugs have side effects on their intended populations. What happens when you start giving them to the normals?
It seems to me that society needs to reevaluate its criteria for acceptable behavior. If people think that bumbling conversations are so terrible they need drugs, then something is wrong here. I forsee one of two things happening: 1. Backlash!- Another dark age in the coming! OR 2. Real-life interactions will be significantly diminished.
Of course with all the jerks in the world today, who actually wants to talk to people!
Anyway, it's interesting to think about women in the 21st century. More women than men are going to school nowadays and some are talking about now encouraging boys more than girls because the past efforts embolden the girls has resulted in a defecit of educated men. There was an article in the NY Times about women choosing to quit their jobs and be stay-at-home moms over advancing their careers. I wonder why that is.
Could it be that extra X chromosome? I usually hate pointing to genetics for answers to social behaviors. Is it society/media? All those movies and TV shows exemplifying the perfect woman as being happily subservient, nurturing, and... whatever. That's probably a stronger explanation. Perhaps it has something to do with that biological clock. Beats me, I'm neither a woman nor a sociologist(sp?).
Who cares!? I love stuffing!
In the movie "American Beauty", one of the character says something about neverunderestimating the power of denial, while referring to his parents willingness to deny his drug business. Without denial, his parents probably couldn't function in the most minimal way. Maybe we will all do the same thing in a smaller way.
In an intellectual sense, I know that bad things happen to good people and that bad people do bad things. Murders, tortures, and rapes probably happen on an hourly basis if not more frequently. On one hand, it sounds inhuman to pretend those things don't exist. On the other, I'd probably lose my mind. Foreigners accuse Americans of being close-minded, uncultured, and insensitive, but I think that we (yes, I'm American) don't live the type of lives that prepare us for the inhumanity. Lots of articles talk about how violent America is, but I think most of us live pretty sedate and protected lives. I know I did.
Should we live in a world of denial? I think most psychiatrists would say no, but a little denial is probably healthy. It helps us function and get through the day. It protects us from the inundation of cruelness from the world. Without denial, we'd probably slit our wrists.
I love coffee. Plain and simple. It's weird because I used to not like it. During my junior year in college, my roomate wanted to get some coffee. Since I was the one with car, I volunteered to drive him to Dunkin Donuts; I figured I'd have a donut or two. Well, I had a small coffee and I was pleasantly surprised! My parents make coffee that is too weak, and my work-study boss made coffee way too strong (she's European). Since then, I've been hooked.
It's interesting how we drink things that actually taste kind of bad. Beer and coffee both taste pretty bad, yet continue to drink. I wonder why that is. Although I liked the DD coffee, it had tons of sugar and creamer in it. As for beer, I just kept drinking it to be cool. Eventually I liked it too. Mmmmmmmmm.... Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeer....
Thoughts on Television
The weird thing, is that I go into some sort of trance that is hard to break. It's very hard to pry myself away from from the darn thing. This is why I think television rots your brain. It's totally a one-way flow of information. You'd think this wouldn't be problem, right? Just watch PBS or the Discovery Channel. The weird thing is that I don't remember very much from those either, unless I actively try to remember things. Of course, then I end up missing stuff while trying to remember the 1st thing.
I think the areas of my brain that are active when I watch TV are useful for nothing else! There's that saying that you only use 10% of your brain or something like that. Maybe they never did those MRI studies while people watched television... Your brain is almost totally inactive when you watch TV. It's weird. You recieve so much information (an hour-long show in DIVX format would be pretty long, I think; I shudder to think of what it would be in AVI!), yet the brain is so idle and you retain so little. I mean, I have trouble sometimes remembering what I just saw!
I think reading is much better. I rememeber a lot more from books than from TV, even though a book has probably 20x more information. MY theory is that when you read a book, you have to think of the pictures in your mind, so in addition to receiving information your mind is actively creating pictures in there.
Unfortunately, we have now come to a conundrum of sorts. I'm pretty sure most people watch just as much, if not more TV than me. The problem arises when your friends/co-workers/bosses/whatever start talking X dating Y on the Z show. It's hard to engage in those conversations. I know this firsthand because I don't see very many movies. In fact, one year I had yet to see any of the nominees for Best Pictures (Moulin Rouge, Lord of the Rings, whatever year that was). Television shows have become a sort of cultural currency or something. It's definitely part of being culturally literate in the U.S. The way I make it sound, you're seriously lacking a person if you don't know how many times Ross has been married from the show "Friends."
The TV is "The Matrix" of our day. We all plug in and escape reality, just sitting in our living rooms "calm as hindu cows." One day, we'll probably plug into our TV's. How creepy will that be?
I was looking on eBay for a Sony U101 and found several for sale. To make a long story shorter, this particular seller was obviously a fraud. I alereted eBay and had the satisfaction of bringing down (temporarily, anyway) a fraud!
I have to admit, I got a cheap thrill of actually affecting something gloablly (the seller was either in the UK or Andorra, maybe somewhere else, though). My life is normally pretty boring to the external observer. Not that this combats that, but I thought it was cool. I wanted to buy it for $1.00, but as soon as I tried, they pulled the item off the auction block and tried to get me to buy it sans eBay.
Anyway, my girlfriend was kind of impressed, which surprised me actually!
That's it for today!
Commence Brain Dump
I'm basically going to use this as a brain dump and just type whatever comes to mind. I don't always think the way I type, so it may be difficult, annoying, or boring to read. Just a warning.
I'll try to write often, but no promises!