Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Grumpy Old Man (Score 2) 149

Agreed- today in ARMv8 land, it's actually not too bad to work with at all at low-level.
Before ARMv7, it will still common to find vendor-specific MMU implementations (fucking kill me)
Linus' argument will wash anyone who's worked with ARM since the early days with nostalgia and nausea. They know what he's talking about.

But it just really isn't the case these days.

Comment Re: battery life over time (Score 1) 292

I'm not seeing where worn out batteries in iPhones have been a problem for anyone.

I'm on my... 8th iPhone.
I'm not saying it's planned, but the primary reason I upgrade (almost) every year is because the phone now holds at maximum a few hours of use-charge.
Contrast that to my OPO, which still has over a day of battery life, years on.
I'm not an Apple hater, or a fanboy. Work supplies me with a phone service, and I always do an iPhone. For my personal device, I've always got an android. I'm not for or against either, they're both great devices.... but battery life has been a consistent problem on me and my colleagues iPhones. Perhaps our use (very high) differs from yours.

I still have my iPhone 4s, and my 5s, and my 6s. All 3 of them hold a charge for under 3 hours.

Comment Re: No they aren't denying it (Score 1) 680

Besides a few extreme not credible nutcases like Richard Carrier no biblical scholar agrees he never existed.

See the problem?
Now, I certainly cannot speak to all biblical scholars, but I did know one in college. That he could say with a straight face what he sought within that book was The Truth was one of the more perplexing mysteries of my life. The cognitive dissonance was strong with that one.
I've researched the presented evidence for the historicity of Jesus pretty deeply. It's all propped up on some really bad logic.
There is no hard evidence, and that's *weird*, because he was supposedly a major world player at the time. Why is it we don't hear about him until hundreds of years later?

I think it would be a cool story if he was just some cult leader who got raised to messianic status post-mortem, but there just isn't anything credible I've seen to suggest that.

Also Paul heard of Jesus far away near The Turkey which means Jews passed on Jesus to his synagogue.

This is what I'm talking about- that is *not* a fact.

The fact the early Christians did not consider Jesus God as evident in the book of Mark disproves Richard Carrier theory of how he got invented.

Nor is that.

How is it fair to ignore all of the inconsistencies of the stories in favor of the few consistencies? The time between confirmed writings and his supposed existence is more than long enough for a myth to start.

Overall, I see a lot more to support him not having existed than supporting that he did exist. But I fully concede either is possible, with an open mind.

Comment Re:No they aren't denying it (Score 1) 680

The consensus is that Beethoven was a great composer.

Tsk, Tsk. That's like, their opinion, man.

We can use a common consensus to agree that the fictional character Jesus is a cool guy, or not a cool guy based upon whatever taste/culture norms rule the day, but to quote a wiser man than I, "You are entitled to your own opinion. You are not entitled to your own facts."
No matter *how* many people disbelieve Global Warming (as if a fact could be wished out of existence) it is *still* real. Thermodynamics and QED say it *must* be, and there is not one shred of evidence, not for a lack of searching for 100 years, to show that they're not correct in this instance.

The fact that more people believe in Christianity than Nordic religions is simply a factor of population growth after conquest of one of those religions by the other.
When Islam overtakes Christianity, will it then become the One True Religion? Your argument is fucking stupid.

Comment Re:Incoming liberal asspain (Score 1) 867

What the hell are you talking about, man? Hillary is very clearly ahead.
Clinton's hold over her states is far firmer than Trump's.
Hillary can carry the win with all the states she currently has in her favor, the weakest of them being NH with a 35 point disparity in her favor.
Trump can't win without flipping at the least, her weakest state.
Now let's look at Trump's weakest states- NV: .4 points in Trump's favor, FL: 2.2 points in Trump's favor, NC: 12 points in Trump's favor, OH: 15 points in Trump's favor. It's only a question of how bad he loses. It may end up being really damn close, but he's not taking any of her states away without a miracle.

Comment Re:Why is Windows 10 the benchmark? (Score 1) 205

Actually, I apologize for my previous post. I wasn't looking at TFA's board, I was looking at a board another poster posted specs to that *I* thought TFA was about. Similarly priced, quad-core 1.9ghz Atom in RPi format... Much cooler than the thing the TFA is actually about.

Comment Re:Why is Windows 10 the benchmark? (Score 1) 205

But it's not that much better.

You have a really funny personal definition of better
This thing is over twice as fast, has better peripherals and interconnects onboard, can have oodles more memory, and on-board eMMC.

if not better due to GPIO and a massive community

It has the same physical layout as an RPi, including the 40-pin header exposing GPIO and other peripheral bus interfaces.
And you're going to have a hard-sell saying an Intel machine has a smaller community than an RPi.

That all being said,
It's definitely not competitive to the RPi in markets where people care about the price difference, that's for sure.
The RPi really is more of a toy next to this thing, and the price difference reflects that. For people who want an RPi that isn't so damn underperforming, this will be another good option.

Comment Re:China china china... (Score 1) 275

In the defense of everyone involved... Without a de-orbit burn, it's goddamn near impossible to predict exactly when something at orbital velocity will succumb to air drag enough for its orbit to rapidly degrade.
A lack of a de-orbit strategy really doesn't speak to the competency of any engineer or group of engineers involved. It's an economic and practical decision. It takes big boosters and lots of fuel to do a truly controlled de-orbit of a heavy spacecraft travelling at orbital velocities, and these stations aren't equipped for that. We used a booster launched from the ground to move it to its parking orbit.

NASA considered adding retrorockets so that it could be deorbited in a controlled fashion, but the weight and cost was deemed worse than the risk involved with uncontrolled reentry.

Slashdot Top Deals

Lavish spending can be disastrous. Don't buy any lavishes for a while.