I mildly regret not signing up for an account when I started to read
I mildly regret not signing up for an account when I started to read
Die, you misbegotten fucking idiots, die!
Seriously though, they'll be using BB as a textbook example of how to completely miss an emerging market for decades to come.
Sigh. Your jovial flamebait disappoints although your final conclusion is accurate. You must be a fan of the clickbait headline strategies.
Brand licensing deals need to be outlawed. The notion is absolutely ridiculous in the modern age, a world where international boundaries mean little. How are consumers supposed to know that their Blackberry manufactured in India is different from another Blackberry manufactured in China, in fact coming from two entirely different companies? This is absurd. Either sell the entire company, or just let it rest in peace.
Nobody wants to buy the company. They tried. They failed. Instead of laying off the remaining few thousand workers they let other companies give them some revenue for the brand name while they target other markets with other brands like QNX. It also means the consumer brand Blackberry will suck unless some vendor can do something novel. It was a mistake and a waste of money to change the company name from Research In Motion to BlackBerry about 3 years ago.
so you can prove you voted the way you were paid to vote
Since every jurisdiction that I've heard of allows you to request a replacement ballot, only a fool would pay for a picture of a marked ballot.
I think you underestimate how many fools there are. How many people know they can get a replacement ballot? How many people will just do what they are asked when there is money involved?
If you really care about audio quality, you should be pretty excited about headphones that can draw power from the lightning connecter... that allows for better processing, better noise cancellation, and so on all for headphones that never need a battery.
That's something that couldn't happen if Apple stuck with audio jacks.
This doesn't make sense. The DAC is the most important component of digital audio quality. Moving it to the headphones does none of these things (digital processing is still in the phone) and takes the control of audio quality entirely out of Apple's hands. This seems counter to their general philosophy.
As for the wireless part, it seems like Apple is trying to make that as nice as possible, with as high a quality as possible. That too is better if you care about audio at all.
So why so down on such an obvious improvement that helps wired AND wireless users?
This also doesn't make sense. Bluetooth compression is known for reducing audio quality, even if you ignore the various reported connectivity issues.
Replacing an old standard without an improved solution (even if proprietary) is very unlike Apple. My only conclusion is this is a money grab. It shows them struggling to differentiate themselves in the market. I think they may have jumped the shark.
If you support Hillary, you're supporting Hillary. It's obvious. If you give your approval to candidates like that, you're going to get candidates like that.
So Hillary is one of "the most corrupt and reprehensible people imaginable"? Citation needed.
She has been under investigation almost continuously for more than 20 years by both legal authorities and very rich political opponents. During that time, the only thing which has been proven is that she sucks at email security. If she had done anything serious, SOMEONE would have sold out and given proof.
She doesn't do much obviously illegal (the email security breaches would have gotten anyone else fired or in jail), she helps out her friends, and knows more dirt on people than J Edgar Hoover. Why would anyone sell her out? This doesn't mean she is an ethical person and the sheer volume of suspicious activities specifically involving her and not other people in similar positions, say, Condoleezza Rice or almost everyone else I can think of actually, should raise some suspicions. There is simply a tremendous volume of things to overlook. One of my favorites is the security trader who donated at least a million and got appointed to the ISAB. Nobody knew why he was there and he resigned as soon as reporters started asking questions.
I looked up the definition of "evil" on M-W and found two definitions. The two candidates seem to be particularly well suited to the roles.
a : morally reprehensible : sinful, wicked
b : arising from actual or imputed bad character or conduct
Actually, the bathroom issue is also generating outrage. For an example a college in New York has removed all gender identification from bathroom doors.
My home bathroom is gender neutral.
Nowhere does it state Oxygen is produced in the process.
There is a national grid, or rather two of them, east side and west side. The split is roughly from Montana down to Texas. It's been like that for decades. Are they talking about upgrading it or what exactly do they mean? Power is sold back and forth all over the east and all over the west.
There are 3 continental grids: East, West and Texas.
Nukes don't vary output well. Thus storage is needed in a nukes only system.
This is a common misconception based on old nuclear designs that were designed specifically to be base-load-only. Fukushima was one. Nuclear power is extremely flexible and has minimal constraints due to technological reasons. France is 75% nuclear and has load-following generation III reactors capable of daily load cycling of 50%-100% capacity at a ramp rate of 3-5%/minute.
The new AP-1000 is a gen III+ reactor rated to change from 30%-100% at a response time similar to coal or gas turbines. There are many other different and smaller reactor designs that could easily be used to supplement the large reactors, as a complete power solution.
There are many valid arguments against nuclear, but this isn't one of the stronger ones.
OMG, trees in a desert are going to die?
Most of California isn't a desert, and most of the desert parts of California don't have trees (because, you know, it's a desert).
It's not a desert yet. If the drought continues and they continue to pump every last drop out of the ground it might become one.
The reason why consumers "prefer" bigger phones is not because people want a change of clothing with bigger pockets... but the faster CPUs and such require more area to deal with heat.
Of course, I've been told by someone in the industry that nobody would give up CPU and RAM for a smaller phone, but it would be nice to have a phone about the size of an iPhone 4.
I work in the industry. I can tell you that the size is due to the display. It's not primarily due to heat dissipation. The manufacturers are convinced (based on trends and sales) that people want big phones with 5" or larger screens.
That sounds like a lot of footwork and configuration and synchronization projects required up-front - above and beyond the cost savings (meaning getting rid of your IT staff) of going to a cloud service in the first place. Hardly automatic "ready and waiting".
Wind power has only a small impact on the environment, and the area it is spread out over is largely empty. The environmental impact is minuscule.
The environmental impact of wind is still being studied, however the turbines are not very attractive nor quiet when you are near one, and as you say they are spread over a very large area. There is early evidence that the sound of the turbines does cause stress to wildlife. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597302.
It is known that animals also avoid power line corridors (very unfortunate as these are typically considered as beneficial animal corridors during environmental assessments). http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/mar/12/animals-powerlines-sky-wildlife.
The impact of animals avoiding large areas of wind farms and crossing the new power lines is unknown however probably not miniscule.
Nuclear is far better understood as well as far more localized. The newer reactors are much safer than the ones that failed in the past. Even after a disaster the animals are thriving. http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/1011/Wildlife-thriving-in-abandoned-Chernobyl-zone
Users should only [reuse passwords] where the compromise of one password does not result in the compromise of more valuable data protected by the same password on a different system.
So if I have access to a highly sensitive system, it's OK to reuse that password on a system with lower value data.
OK - got it.
I am pretty sure (hoping) you are being sarcastic because that is not what the quote says at all. It is only ok to re-use a password when both systems have equivalent levels of data value.
To provide a car analogy: It is perfectly fine to use the same key for both my Toyota Corolla and my Ford Focus. However also using that key for my Aston Martin would be unacceptable.
A committee takes root and grows, it flowers, wilts and dies, scattering the seed from which other committees will bloom. -- Parkinson