Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Confusing (Score 2) 181

The first round of net neutrality legislation in the Netherlands (2011) was adopted to stop mobile providers from charging subscribers extra for the "service" of not blocking instant messaging and VOIP applications like Whatsapp and Skype, which were eating into their revenues streams from calls and SMS (text messages).

The current round of legislation (May 2016) forbids zero-rating. It's strict only in the sense that, like the 2011 law at the time, it's ahead of what the EU is discussing at the moment. If common sense prevails over lobbying, the EU will eventually reach the same conclusion: that zero-rating is bad for consumers and new services.

The GSMA says the tighter laws in the Netherlands will 'hinder development of innovative services and consumer choice'.

With zero-rating, it's the providers who push users towards particular services (like music streaming subscriptions); without zero-rating the consumer has an equal choice between services. So clearly innovation is better served by not having zero-rating, since that will provide a level playing field for new services.

Comment Retro advertising (Score 1) 261

Jesus Christ. My Atari 2600 Superman game had a cartoon of Superman on the front of the box, but only a pixillated blob in the actual game. You didn't hear about people demanding a refund because of that. Of course the advertising lies. What kind of surprise is that for anyone?

That the game wouldn't look as good as the cartoon should have been obvious to every Atari 2600 owner. However, what did happen in the 80's is that a game with ports to multiple computer systems would have screenshots on the back of the best looking port, not of the port that was actually in the box. That was misleading, in my opinion.

Comment Re:Trying to clam acts of god to get out of being (Score 1) 145

It reminds me of people blaming compiler bugs for non-working code. While it does happen that a compiler generates incorrect code (I've encountered a few instances over the years), unless you either have reduced the problem to a minimal test case or examined the generated assembly and located the problem there, it's far more likely that it's a case of not digging deep enough to find a bug in your own code.

Comment Re:Ok, what's the catch? (Score 1) 89

Not a big fan of SystemD, but I can tolerate it. I don't have an irrational hatred of PulseAudio either, but I've had applications playing no audio at all or playing laggy or choppy audio on three occasions and each time the problem went away after deinstalling PulseAudio. There really is something wrong with either PulseAudio itself or its integration with other components on this system (openSUSE KDE5).

Comment Re:They didn't really respond (Score 4, Insightful) 159

Exactly. The core issue is that Windows 10 is collecting personal information that is not required for the functioning of the OS or the services it provides to the user. There doesn't have to be a discussion over where Microsoft stores the information, since they shouldn't be collecting it in the first place.

Comment Re:put the pitchforks down (Score 1) 89

What you describe is called mediation. Binding arbitration is not about settling, it's a non-judge making a decision about how the conflict is resolved. It is supposed to be legally binding, so if you'd want to fight the outcome in court you'd first have to get the arbitration itself declared invalid.

Comment Re:Not on US Soil (Score 1) 210

I have a problem with them prosecuting a person in another country. Does that mean I am subject to foreign laws? This is all bullshit.

Most likely what he did was illegal in his own country as well. That's one of the things they look at when deciding whether to extradite someone or not.

And as general policy there should be no hacking laws. All traffic over a computer network is speech.

You could make a convincing argument for "with a computer" laws being a bad idea. But then cracking could be covered by a law against using deception to access information that you should have known you were not intended to access. Speech/writing can be illegal, for example fraud.

Comment and is on Cloudflare (Score 1) 116

Regarding cookies, you're always going to get one on my site, whether you are using Tor or not, to support logins. HTTP isn't session-based and you need cookies to simulate sessions, so that you can have logins and dispense privileges where appropriate.

If you hand out session IDs prior to authentication, you're vulnerable to session fixation. So giving session cookies to all visitors is not required for the purpose of supporting logins, since you're going to have to give them a new session ID after logging in.

Slashdot Top Deals

Mediocrity finds safety in standardization. -- Frederick Crane