Who cares about a single year
Who cares about a single year
Lets say we just keep shoveling food aid at the third world and they keep procreating. What will you do when their populations become unsustainable where they are? Do you then propose to spread them out all over the rest of the world? With the inevitable ethnic strive that will cause because the native population will have vast advantages economically and will be resented for it, while the third world immigrants take over control of the nations through the ballot box.
Do you see good things coming from this? Your way leads to a world drowning in blood.
Unless the singularity comes to save us first, which I kinda doubt.
Luckily most of it is covered by water which is pretty good at evening things out.
The predictions of pretty much every climate model from 20 years ago have been wildly pessimistic though.
Was there significant warming last century? Yes. Are climate scientists any good at predicting the climate lately? No.
Wow, -2 within a minute
All this discussion of global warming and water resources is just preparation for white genocide.
This is all just laying the ground work for the argument that Europe (and Russia) that have to allow mass immigration from Africa, because whites are responsible for global warming and global warming is causing all the problems in Africa (of course population growth and their inability to govern themselves has absolutely nothing to do with it you racist!).
At the rate Africa is using it's ground water it's a non renewable resource, their coming massive water shortages have comparatively little to do with global warming.
On a large scale you can't afford to feed it with lab grade water and CO2, it will foul.
It's not funny because the shape is all wrong and you can't tell a joke.
Now if you said that you called it a micropenis and dropped the attitude you might have gotten a smirk from me.
Another success for multiculturalism and foreign allegiance.
No they wouldn't, the University can't afford to go half a year without IT.
I'd like the more chaotic transition period.
But they aren't ordering by "score, race". They are ordering by "score" and the score is racist (and ableist and sexist).
The only way for it to be fair in the social justice sense is to order completely by "random".
I'm also perfectly alright with people who dress like thugs getting hassled more by the police BTW. Even if that is on average racist.
Just don't dress like a thug.
I would be okay with companies charging blacks more. If we as a society consider it important that the average blacks gets equal cost loans as the average white regardless of the fact that they on average default more then it's government's responsibility to make up the difference.
We shouldn't force the companies into pretending insane decisions are sane, insanity is not something we should strive for.
If the AI agrees with you there are better statistical predictors it will simply "ignore" the single parent status. It's not prejudiced, it's just profit optimizing.
FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: #44 Zebras are colored with dark stripes on a light background.