I'm curious to see if he's broke and living off bank loans like I beleive.
I'm curious to see if he's broke and living off bank loans like I beleive.
I doubt seriously that companies are going to risk going back to the 60's or 70's policies and products - even if the EPA wasn't there to stop them.
"Hand of the market" libertarian fairytale bullshit! History has shown, again and again, that the majority of companies will take the path that earns them the most money in the short term; damn the consequences. The few that don't, if no action is taken against the ones that do, are eventually forced by investors to adopt the same disastrous policies to remain competitive. The EPA is one option to try and prevent this behavior by giving the good companies some equalizing leverage against the bad actors, when all goes well.
so I think that the pendulum is definitely swinging towards conservatism and protecting the environment regardless of the party in political power at the time.
People seem to forget that the EPA was created by that liberal commie, Richard Nixon. [/sarcasm] for the sarcasm impaired. People in power, regardless of political party, who aren't in the pocket of the big, industrial polluters know that there needs to be a force against companies that wish to destroy the environment we live in for profit.
But even for all the good that the EPA has done, you still have companies like VW scamming the system. So saying that government is the solution really doesn't work either.
So, you're suggesting that since the EPA doesn't work 100% of the time, that it should be thrown away? By that logic, I'm sure that you have had failures and did not succeed 100% of the time. Should we throw you away as well? Look, the EPA has had failures, I don't dispute that. But, given the fact that the people that they have to report to (congress) has a leadership that has a vested interest in making sure that they can't work, they're doing an ok job. It comes down to if they are doing more good than harm. Right now, overall, they still fall under doing more good.
Reducing the federal government's size and scope doesn't necessarily mean that the functions it does will all disappear. Some will be taken over by other departments if they need to exist at the federal level, and some will be taken over by the states (where the founders of the country intended them to be).
Umm... other federal agencies cannot suddenly extend their mandate without authorization from congress. And, congress is not going to extend another department to take over the EPA because they already have a department to do the job... the EPA. You really think that that states would have any chance against the money of the gross polluting industries? The Koch brothers and their allies, all heavily invested in gross polluting industries such as coal, power generation, paper, timber and other such industries, have pledged just shy of 1 billion dollars in support of candidates that, in addition to other things, sign off on supporting the complete elimination of the EPA. (To put that in perspective, Delaware's entire projected 2017 annual budget is 4.1 billion dollars.) Do you really think that they're spending 1 billion dollars because they think environmental regulations can really be ran better by states or industry? Hell no! They're funding it because, if they can ram dissolving the EPA through congress, they feel they can make significantly more than 1 billion dollars by selling our planet's habitable future for profit. And if our planet is not habitable for future generations... well, that's not their problem.
Your solution, to put it in a metaphor: A fox gets past the hen house guard dog once in awhile and kills a chicken. Your proposal is the same as the farmer shooting the dog for not doing his job and saying to the chickens: "Sorry, you're on your own." and walking away; hoping the problem sorts itself out.
Sadly, it can be worse. The level of corruption of Brazil's last two presidents makes Hillary Clinton look like a rank amatur selling favors on a street corner and Kim Jong-un of North Korea makes Donald Trump look like a wise and level-headed saint as hard as it is to believe. That said, I don't actually recommend voting for either one of them as there are better choices in the field, even if the media doesn't want to cover them.
The only thing that could be "leaked" that would be of interest would be his tax returns. I wonder if they would prove him to be as broke as I think he is.
The point is to get any attention from the US media about US events that actually matter, you have to be a complete and total asshole about it or else they ignore you. Assange is just such an asshole (I don't dispute this fact.)
Assange was never accused of rape by the two women. They went to the police to track him down to take a STD test because a condom came off. Once it was realized who they were checking on, the police pressured them into filing a criminal charge of a type of secondary sexual battery charge (a type that doesn't exist in any other country; so no equivalent to match it to) of which the women have since withdrawn when they realized they were used by the police for political purposes. Note: Sweden did this due to US pressure which is a violation of Sweden's constitution. Misogynist? Maybe; and falls under asshole anyway so, it's not worth the debate even if you're wrong. He's not alt-right, not the racist version currently running rampant through Europe but, he's a serious libertarian though. His support of Ron Paul points to this as well. He doesn't trust governments in any form at the moment as even the "good" ones seem to be corrupt as hell at the moment. With the data he's published and the actions taken against him, do you blame him?
There's one word for why competition is not keeping prices low in the US: collusion. It was a practice that the US government used to clamp down heavily but, enforcement has waned significantly since the Reagan era (both Democratic and Republican presidents have been responsible). For example, there is no way that a wireless carrier can change all their plans and prices and a competitor change to matching ones within 24 hours without collusion between the two as the billing systems take a few weeks to a few months to prep plus marketing materials needs to be submitted to advertisers days or weeks in advance. So, it is impossible for both to change within 24 hours of each other unless they agreed upon the changes in advance. If it were a case of spying on their competitors then they would come out with one that is better, or at least appears better, than their competitor instead of the same.
But, the reality is that if the US government crashes and burns, the whole world feels the pain with Americans getting the brunt of it. The US government does not exist in a protective barrier that we're shielded from. If it explodes, we get hit in the blast.
I've come to the conclusion that if Trump wins, we truly deserve him as our president. It doesn't mean I'll enjoy the russian roulette ride though.
I'm sure that even if Google doesn't support the option, someone will figure it out quickly.
I know that Google has been working on and planning this "marriage" of OSes when they released Android and CromeOS. They said at the time that the hardware and apps just wasn't up to the marriage they envisioned. Apparently, they have decided that now is the time. Most likely, this hybrid OS will run stock Android apps and will also likely replace both of the current OSes in time. This has been Google's vision since the start of these projects. Now, we'll see if they pull it off. I hope they do for the simple reason that one OS from a company is usually better than two; especially when it comes to support.
Oracle is the pinnacle of a "pay to play" company. You will not see another affordable SPARC system again unless the sell off the line to another company.
They're just wannabe
I had the same with Vioxx. I think they were mostly nailed for knowingly lying to the FDA about the risks of the drug. I now take Meloxicam which works almost as well.
Then get off your arse and do your own research if you don't want to take my word for it.
I'm not saying this tool will completely block all of the data collected but, it does block the vast majority of it and is simple to install and it's from a company I find reliable: Spybot Anti-Beacon.
Federal grants are offered for... research into the recreation potential of interplanetary space travel for the culturally disadvantaged.