Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Different targets (Score 1) 210

Yes. This is something I've noticed with friends who wear them. I hear how many steps they walked, but I don't know anyone that took a baseline of how many steps they walk normally. If you are already walking 8000 steps a day, then walking 10,000 isn't that big a deal (I'm making up numbers). They really need to build in a deficit to show 'you are below your daily average' vs just a raw total that may make you feel more productive than you really were.

Comment Re:Computer Power and Human Reasoning (Score 3, Informative) 428

Exactly. A person was not sitting there watching the news thinking 'Excellent, we can get some extra dollars from this.' The algorithm saw more people than normal were suddenly looking for a ride, and the prices went up. From what I see, when Uber realized _why_ they tried to make adjustments, but people still complained they weren't adjusting it enough or in all areas or such.

This isn't a company trying to profit from terrorism; this is a company who has a product that is not being accused because they probably haven't had to deal with this before. And accurate news coverage during these times isn't exactly spot on; I doubt it was clear who/what/where was going on so they could accurately make all changes that in hindsight would have made sense.

Comment The Pitch is the Problem (Score 4, Informative) 170

Most people see a tablet and know what they want to do with it, or are surprised when it's better than expected. Only tech reviewers and vendor marketing departments were planning on tablets replacing all those things listed. I bought mine because I wanted a tablet, not a phone replacement or a laptop replacement or an interactive dinner plate/hack du jour. I assume most of it is due to a need to generate sales and page views and all that, but mostly I found it was all fairly silly. I like my tablet because it's a tablet, stop trying to tell me why I _should_ like it.

Comment Wrong Example (Score 1) 951

I think he picked the wrong example. And it may just be me getting into the semantics of it, but he talks about how everything looks, not how everything thinks. Our versions of AI are not all that great in mass produced form. Current games and those MMORPG simulations that get referred to have terrible AI. Maybe not 'terrible', but compared to a human or real thought they are terrible. Just this morning I watched a companion in a video game attempt to run through a wall to get me, then ran the wrong way around the building. It looks really good, so I agree that before long we will be able to have photo realistic games, but I doubt they will think much better. Now on the galactic scale, I might be splitting hairs, in that it won't be 1000 years but maybe 10 or 100 thousand years before we can get AI to that level. And if the naysayers have anything to add, they'll tell you we'll blow ourselves up or poison ourselves or INSERTCATASTROPHYHERE.

Comment AR / Windows (Score 3, Interesting) 171

Really the place this will be useful is where we already have clear glass surfaces: windows, windshields, goggles, etc. But the main purpose there will be for AR or simple notifications. Standing at the window and having updates about what you are seeing or random data that somehow applies. Windshields and HUDs seems obvious. 'Smart' Goggles that give you useful info while working on whatever (chemicals, temperatures, electricity, etc). Or for that extra modern look, a TV that you hang on the wall and is clear while off or displays the art on the wall, but then turns on and 'replaces' the wall/art/etc with whatever you want to watch.

Comment Free is the Problem (Score 3, Insightful) 311

I love the random news sites/aggregators I visit, and I use ad blockers, but we are the problem. I don't pay for any of the sites I visit, I don't donate money to them, and I get annoyed with bad/aggressive ads, and worry about malware, so I use ad blockers. This means that sites I visit are not generating revenue. Most of us here probably do the same thing. So that means they have less money to do _any_ journalism let alone good journalism.

There are the hardcore people who feel everything should be free, but I doubt they go to work and do their job for free. Now, some random person blogging for fun, yes I get annoyed when they have ads all over the place, and the click-bait sites that put every sentence on a different page. Those are their own categories. But nothing is going to change until all we have is complete crap. Then someone will start charging and it will be seen as an innovation. People will say, "amazing! they charge us money and we get quality things!" but we aren't there yet. We have to hit bottom, or someone has to come up with an actual way to allow the give and take that is fair and non-obtrusive.

Comment Is Cold Fusion by definition pseudoscience? (Score 1) 344

Not being familiar with the specifics of this area, is cold fusion by it's nature always pseudoscience, or is it just the fact that all the hucksters and "scientists" keep inventing/discovering it that it's tainted? I understand why perpetual motion machines, for example, would fall into pseudoscience unless prefaced by some amazing breakthrough, so is cold fusion the same?

Comment Security Now (Score 3, Insightful) 318

Listen the last few SecurityNow podcasts. They've been debating tracking, advertising on sites, and content blocking off and on. They've had good talking points from both sides of the issue. Basically it comes down to the good sites who provide service needing ads to help pay the bills, and users not wanting to be tracked and preventing obnoxious, terrible, or even malicious content. It all makes sense, however right now the only way users can safely protect themselves ends up being content blocking.

Comment Too Slowly? (Score 1) 253

They were spinning too slowly? Isn't this why the pilot has a throttle? And if they are supposed to 'correct' and 'adjust' the input from the pilot, as one article explains, then how did it ever take off in the first place? Shouldn't there be a basic check like 'if altitude != 0 { allow_engine_off("NO!") } I'm sure there are all sorts of reasons why it's better this way, but it seems like when the plane is able to just ignore the pilot, then you are simply waiting for a catastrophe to occur.

Comment Ugh. (Score 1) 37

I forgot it was April Fools and this was the first story I read, and I was highly annoyed someone was writing about a game and not including at least some indication of _what_ game it was. Then I saw the next story.. and the next one.. and I forgot that on April 1st it was tough to come around here.

Comment When.. (Score 1) 129

When we actually get to the point where we can define sentience and create it, then we have to worry about those things. And while the Three Laws are really just part of a story, they at least get the ethics discussion going, even if they would not work themselves. However, I know I've seen at least one Star Trek episode where both sides create robots/weapons, that then end up killing all the humanoids and just keep on ticking. I think it just all relates back to the complexity of creating 'life' and the fear of the uncertainty around it.

Comment Not Too Surprised (Score 1) 529

By the event or the comments today. Some interesting news, but nothing too earth shattering.

And the comments seem to break down to one or the either:
1. Apple is dumb, watches are dumb, I have a phone.
2. High end watches (fashion or otherwise) cost money, so the Apple Watches are in the right ballpark.

I stopped wearing a watch a long while back, but have thought about getting a more fashionable watch, to act more like a piece of jewelry. I like Apple and my iPhone, but I don't really see myself choosing to buy this instead of a nice fashion watch instead.

Comment Free Music (Score -1, Troll) 201

I still don't understand why people flipped about this. You got a free album from a real band (your preference for/against U2 will vary). I do like U2, so I'm sure I'm biased towards them, but I can tell you I haven't listened to the album at all. It's nice I got it for free, but I can turn off the sync and no big deal. Not on my phone, not in my custom playlists. If you don't like it, who cares. Stop whining. I don't like Country, but if I got a free country album I'd say 'That's cool' and never listen to it. No one trampled on your rights or raped your ears.

Slashdot Top Deals

One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.