Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:Expected /. response (Score 4, Insightful) 503

When Windows updates routinely override existing settings and break existing setups, they fit my definition of malware. Windows 10 qualifies fully and I wish I had never applied the update on one machine last summer. I know several people who applied the update and only one of them is happy with it (as of a few months ago, it is not topic number one).
Microsoft seem to think we bought our PCs so we could run Windows Update and glory in its magnificence. No, I bought mine to perform certain functions and installing Windows 10 has broken more than it alleviated. It is not the security features which annoy me, even the telemetry is a lesser irritant. What really annoys me is when an update leaves something utterly broken, and the knowledge that the next update is going to repeat the experience.

Comment Re:Options (Score 5, Interesting) 503

My experience of Windows 10 updates is that they fully qualify as malware. They break things, screw up settings and you cannot even opt out.

Windows 7 updates started trending that way a year ago - when Microsoft started trying to force Windows 10 down collective throats. People started checking every non-security update before installing it. Googling each update in turn, I learned to classify most of the leading search results as uninformed bovine faeces, but with Microsoft's description on updates as being "This will fix a Windows problem" they were pretty much the only game in town so updates only went in when I was sure they would do no damage. The bottom line there was that the Windows 7 install base fractured - Microsoft could no longer make any assumptions at all as to which updates were installed and which ones not. Their fix to the problem they created was to bundle all updates together.
Guess what, there is something in there which leads to an Install / Back Out loop on my remaining Windows 7 machine. Its patch-level is pretty much that of September. Microsoft can now say that Windows 10 would be more secure than that, but I get around it by treating it as a Windows XP installation - no emails and no browsing, just the two or three applications which were the reason I bought a Windows 7 machine in the first place.

Comment Re:Fake stories like... (Score 1) 470

I have noticed a persistent pattern in recent years where the actual result is a few percent to the right of what the polls were predicting. This includes this election, the last two or three in Britain, the most recent one in Israel and Brexit. Either people are lying about their intentions or the samples are non-representative.
One of the polling institutes in Germany used to behave differently, the owner and founder was a personal friend of the head of the CDU and it seemed her findings were whatever would benefit the party most.

Comment Re:Mess of their own making. (Score 1) 470

Whether that's "right" or not is a long and involved debate. A good many people feel the same way, and why it's often banned in Europe. They had to live under Hitler and his horrible racist-lead destruction, we haven't (yet).
Where has Facebook been banned in Europe?
The only country I can think of is Turkey, which is partially in Europe. Maybe Russia or Belarus but they do not really count.
There was a story here recently about an attempt to prosecute Facebook that some lawyer is making. It is his second try. The public prosecutor is reviewing the evidence before deciding whether to proceed or not.

Comment Re:Security that the USER cannot control. . . (Score 1) 194

Well - I am having a bunch of problems, both with my remaining Windows 7 install (I have some software there which does not run under later levels) and with my Windows 10 machine.

  • Windows 7 updates have been bundled together for two months now. Unfortunately there was an update two years ago which could not be applied on my machine, I had automatic updates on back then and it was forwards - backwards - forwards - backwards completely automatically until I booted up into safe mode and turned automatic updates off. The bundled updates look to be including that particular patch so my Windows 7 is in a similar state to an ancient Win XP laptop lying around somewhere: Unsupported. I think I need to work out what the legal situation is here.
  • My Windows 10 machine was dual-boot with Linux. Windows 10 broke that with the October update (or was it September?) and it is going to take a lot of time and energy to recover things, Windows 10 updates routinely and deliberately reset configuration values. Each time. Breaking things deliberately is not improved security, it is what Malware does. The only thing stopping me reverting to Windows 7 is that the machine prefers UEFI and that is a bear under Windows 7.

Microsoft seem to think that I bought my computers so I could experience the privilege of running Windows Update, the thought that I could actually want to run anything else on it has either not reached their consciousness or it is something they are actively trying to inhibit.

Comment Disinformation (Score 2) 30

When Yahoo initially claimed they were breached by a "state sponsored attack", my thoughts were: well - they would say that. Others - better informed - agreed. Now that claim is being spun as a "given", is there really any proof at all of that?
The first I heard about it was at the start of August. That appears to be when the "internal probe" was launched, it took them a further 6 weeks to go public.

Comment Re:Filezilla dev... (Score 1) 166

Is that how he was hacked? I looked at several of the links but did not see that.
codesquid seems to have a very well developed sense of what-he-is-prepared-to-do and what not, or "who cares what the users want because they are clueless?".

I know someone who uses Filezilla but he is on a network which has no direct connection to the outside world. Probably the safest way.

Comment Re:Why we never should handed over control of DNS (Score 1) 179

Hitler was 1/4 Jewish on his mother's side. He was an impoverished loser just trying to survive right up until the outbreak of WW1 - that allowed him to volunteer and be looked after.
The Jews looked after each other, they gave each other work and generally made sure that they were doing ok. If he had been half-jewish he would have had access to that network. Hate, hate, froths at mouth, hate, hate . . .

Hitler came out of WW1 in a far better situation than before the war. To his mind, war had allowed his natural qualities to show through and he floated to the top. War was g-o-o-d.

War was good and the Jews were bad. Everything was s-o-o-o simple. He took over a minor party, spread the word and made it so.
All the lies they told, all means to justify their insane ends.

Comment The article looks to be B.S. (Score 1) 179

This article appears to be written by someone who understands neither the German legal system nor (probably) the language.

Germany has public prosecutors, I think the US has the same system. This lawyer is in private practice. He has essentially gone to the law-enforcement authorities with a complaint. I looked up a German-language source and it is the second time he has tried this, the first one was in Hamburg last year and it was kicked around for a year before being dropped for "formal reasons".
btw, the article I found was dated 30 September - it just took a while for some English-language site to notice.

No big deal.

Finally, a Frank Herbert quote? "Eternal sloppiness is the price of liberty".
People moan that Google (+ Youtube) is too quick to delete content, people moan that Facebook is too slow. The Norwegian head of state recently got really stroppy with Facebook because they had censored that well known full-frontal picture of a naked girl running down the road after a napalm attack in Vietnam. It is not possible to get this one right.

Comment Re:Yes please (Score 2) 304

That assumes prescience, but you always have to expect the unexpected.

I can think of a very good reason *for* this bill - the excerable habit U.S. legislators have of adding totally unrelated "riders" to bills. If this helps to stop that practice, go for it.
As for the opposition, the quote comes down to: "I'm against it because he wants it, waaaaaaa".

Slashdot Top Deals

The reason why worry kills more people than work is that more people worry than work.