The earth is the center of the universe!
AMD just came out with Six-Core processors for $200, how is that stagnant? Intel's only 6-core processor is still $1000
I can't tell if you're trolling or not.
Intel's hexacore offering features hyperthreading technology, which allows each core to execute two threads simultaneously. This means that Intel's hexacore chips actually have twelve logical cores, while the AMD hexacore chips only have six logical cores. Your number of physical cores comparison is meaningless, and actual performance benchmarks show that the Core i7 980X is more than twice as fast as the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T. 
Not being a douche but where in the world are there ISPs like this? Just so I know to stay right away from them, thanks! Australia is in the same boat as Denmark.
We have them in the States.
I had a Comcast router/modem combination very similar to what amorsen describes. When I tried to upgrade the firmware, the Comcast site told me to find my model on Linkysys and get the firmware from them, while Linksys told me that because the model was operating under custom firmware rolled in house by Comcast, I would have to get firmware updates from Comcast.
When it finally died, the tech who came to replace it was surprised that there were any of this model left in the wild because they're "junk". It's my understanding that Comcast is no longer rolling out router/modem combinations and instead provide two separate devices.
The demise of the Google Nexus One phone is fairly straightforward: a lack of sales killed the product.
“The idea a year and a half ago was to do the Nexus One to try to move the phone platform hardware business forward. It clearly did. It was so successful, we didn't have to do a second one." Eric Schmidt, Google's CEO 
Google has tried to paint the Nexus One experiment as a success because it helped build market presence for Android, its operating system.
Clearly false, Google has painted the Nexus One as a success because it has dramatically pushed phone hardware forward. Whether phones as powerful as the EVO 4G and Droid X would be available without the Nexus One, I'll leave as an exercise for the reader.
"I don't think they will (produce another phone)," Dulaney said. "Maybe when the market matures, like it did with personal computers, maybe then you'll see people buying phones off the internet. But right now people want to go in and see the devices."
Google's CEO announced that they wouldn't be producing a "Nexus Two" three motherfucking weeks ago. Thanks for the completely unnecessary speculation, though.
"I called up the board and said: 'Ok, it worked. Congratulations - we're stopping.'" 
 Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/7864223/Googles-Eric-Schmidt-You-can-trust-us-with-your-data.html
Granted, I don't have a 4000-pixel-wide monitor
Nobody does. Consumer monitors are not built that support a native resolution of 4096 x 3072. You would hard pressed to find even a 60" TV that supports this kind of resolution.
Hopefully, Google knows something we don't about the future of display resolutions and this is foreshadowing consumer grade monitors receiving a long needed bump in pixels per dollar. With Apple's "retina display", maybe higher resolutions will become trendy and spark a resolution war. I don't know much about the actual feasibility of this from a technological stand point, so maybe someone in the industry could give us a break down on just how reasonable this is with current technology. This is exciting for anyone who spends a significant amount of time with technology because the advent of screens with higher DPI would significantly improve readability and allow us to deprecate things like font hinting.
More realistically, Google is just trolling for some publicity. Unless YouTube relaxes their compression on 4K video, its current incarnation is useless and, even if Google was to offer high quality 4K video, the bandwidth is simply not available. ISPs would have to roll out infrastructure that allows for speeds of 100+ Mbit/s.
At this point in time, the only reasons for putting 4K video on YouTube are bragging rights and future-proofing.
I think OLPC could've cut out the fat and made it run decently...
OLPC would not be able to cut out the fat and make OSX run decently due to its proprietary nature. Presumably, OLPC chose OSS for the ability to modify the OS to conform to their systems' capabilities, which would simply not be possible on OSX. I'm intensely skeptical of the idea that Steve Jobs would ever offer to license OSX to run on hardware that they did not control.
Particularly, it makes me sad when people say that aversion of gaze is an indicator of dishonesty. Autistic or Asperger-types would be treated like crooks simply because eye contact is too overwhelming for them.
Not looking someone directly in the eye is, in some cultures, a sign of respect. Specifically, the indigenous tribes of northwestern Ontario believe that you only look an inferior in the eye.
I don't think the Justice Department would allow that...at least they shouldn't allow it.
Why is this modded +5 insightful? The only thing that the justice department should not allow is monopolies that are harmful to competition. The OP isn't even talking about a monopoly, just vertical integration, which is perfectly legal.
Indeed, why don't torrent sites and trackers already run over https? Wouldn't that kill this idea entirely, plus any other ISP-based snooping?
Many private trackers (maybe some public, too) already offer https. I'm not a security analyst so I'm unable to comment on how effective the provided services are, but there has certainly been a stab at doing just that.
"Aww, if you make me cry anymore, you'll fog up my helmet." -- "Visionaries" cartoon