** Yes, Nixon included.
I see what you did there.
Hasn't made it into the dictionary so far, but I can't think of another word for "Government by all the evil things you denounced to get you there in the first place."
It's funny that all of this stuff wasn't a big deal to you hyper-partisans when Clinton was accused of them, but they suddenly are a big deal when Trump is doing them.
Your rah-rah-my-team bullshit is fucking up our world. It's a big deal when both teams do it. (And I'm calling you out, Ami, because you were defending Clinton for these very same things.)
It's perfectly valid to point out and criticize hypocracy, regardless of whether one personally agrees or disagrees with the underlying position.
incoherent non sequiturs
Ah, your use of SAT-words makes me feel so inferior, I'm going to cry now... Your chops are so intimidating.
Dude, you're on
That 1st response you wrote response to me was "internally inconsistent; illogical" (incoherent, adj.) and "a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said" (non sequitur, n.).
If Trump's "grabbing pussy" without first obtaining a written permission from the owner was an assault, then so is making somebody "feel unsafe".
See, that's the definition of fallacy. The two have no logical relationship to each other. The dictionary definition you posted actually works against....
God damn it! I just realized I'm arguing with a fucking bot! Okay, you got me. To the computer scientist who created a nutty, illogical, derailing, pro-Trump bot that passes the Turing Test and sounds just like the real thing: Khoroshaya rabota, tovarishch!
"There is nothing new under the sun, but there are lots of old things we don't know yet." -Ambrose Bierce