Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Down the rabbit hole (Score 1, Interesting) 311

The processing of nearly every credit card purchase in the US eventually trickles down to one firm, so perhaps it wasn't the 'big four' conspiring.

I'm not really sure why them setting the same date for themselves affects anyone. Just upgrade your damn terminal already.

Comment Re:FBI Word games (Score 3, Interesting) 367

Exactly. The big difference is that two of the things he mentions are physical spaces that a human has to enter. If the FBI broke into my car, people would see it, they'd be reprimanded, etc. He basically wants the right to secretly dig a tunnel under your home, sneak in while you're not there, steal whatever they want, and leave without anyone knowing it. Except in your phone.

I'm glad that we have people on our side that are smarter than him.

Comment Fighting congestion? (Score 1) 70

I sorta feel like these heli-pads would be a point of congestion ...? Kinda like every train station and parking lot in every city? I'm not seeing how this avoids congestion.

And good luck getting your helipads built around a city like San Francisco. Gigabit internet now comes down from the power lines because people whined too much about a little metal box on every corner. Or even buried under the sidewalk on every corner. (here's an idea. replace all those useless mailboxes with last-mile fiber access points. Problem solved.)

I hear the 'Simply just live near where you work!' crowd already. Hey look, we all can't work stuffing envelopes from home. And guess what? Lots of people already do that, anyway, but we don't live in the same building where we work. I live in the same city but my commute on non-train days still sucks. For a new system of commuting to work, you need to get people from where they live (neighborhoods where houses and apartments are) to where they work (downtown.) I don't see a time where most cities will be cool with helicopters buzzing over densely populated residential areas.

Commercial flight works (mostly) because there's better economics in moving a couple hundred people at one time in the same vehicle. The smaller the vehicle, the less those economics work. There's a reason why so many people take a bus to work and no public transportation system in the world is made up of a fleet of cars.

I figure Airbus has smart people working for them somewhere, but this just seems rather unfeasible. And frankly just kinda dumb.

I'm waiting for a new startup to propose public zip-lines as a means to disrupt the moving economy.

Comment Re:Bluetooth? (Score 1) 394

Sounds like your Nexus 6P is garbage. Should have sprung for a real phone.

I listen to to music through BT with my iPhone 10-15 feet away and it's always rock solid. Headphones, Big Jambox, little Jambox, no problem. It's not the technology itself but the cheap, crappy implementations of it on inferior phones that's the problem.

Comment Re:Idiotic Argument (Score 1) 394

Correction: _licensed_ media, not purchased. People have this notion that they own the music they buy, which has never been true.

Not saying I like DRM or anything, but Apple has a pretty good track record of being anti-DRM. I'm not sure why people think they'll suddenly change their attitude.

Why can't it be that analog headphone jacks are half a century old and they just simply don't belong on a phone in 2016?

Comment Re:Time IS on Apple's Side (Score 1) 111

I'd like to know where you get your drugs.

People said radio was over when talkies came around. Movies were over when TV came around. Now TV is over because ... why? I'm not sure I got it.

The fact remains that good old broadcast TV rakes in huge piles of cash because that's what people want. This pipe dream of cheap content is just that, a pipe dream. I fail to see a day where we're all watching different versions of PewDiePie beamed directly into our brains. Please shoot me.

Good content, good storytellers, all that costs money. I'm paraphrasing David Lynch from a film named Side By Side, about how digital cameras have made the means of production accessible to everyone. He said 'Everyone has access to pencil and paper, but it doesn't make everyone a writer.'

Every so often something decent rises from the primordial goo of the Internet, but then guess what happens? That person gets a regular TV show on regular TV, because that's how people consume content. The ratio of traditional media to 'Internet media' will surely change, but when I'm dead in 30 years or so, network TV ('cable' or broadcast) will still rule the roost, because good entertainment costs money (to produce.)

Comment Re:Skinny? (Score 1) 111

30 bucks for just those few channels is not at all skinny.

Pure speculation, but several networks have a vested interest (literally vested) in Hulu, so my guess is they're not entirely on board with competing with themselves on a different platform that likely won't get them as much cashish.

Apple should just buy Hulu and put live streaming on it.

Slashdot Top Deals

The less time planning, the more time programming.