Only problem is it can not penetrate walls making it essentially line of sight.
That's a good thing.
I think the long-term game for Netflix is probably convincing more studios to make content for it to distribute, and that is disruptive.
To add on to this, I think they're also wanting to get to a point where they have enough of their own original content to strike cross-licensing deals with other studios to distribute their content in exchange for letting them distribute Netflix's.
What if black people were more likely to default on a loan? Would you be OK with charging black people more than white people?
I understand what you're saying, and I understand why people might take various demographic information into account, but you (presumably) wouldn't support making legal random searches on black men, just because one in three end up in jail at some point in their life. We understand at a fundamental level that THAT is wrong.
People should be judged on their worthiness based on what they've done, not how they were born. A loan shouldn't be based on sex or colour.
On a related note, why is it ok for auto insurance companies to charge men more for policies than women?
I don't know why they've been targeted "non-technie" communities
It's simple really. The more desirable places to live have a MUCH higher barrier of entry, making it a royal bitch to get into, even for Google.
...the point is why the fuck would you pay $2,000 per cpu per year to get a polite "piss off" from Red Hat whenever support is needed because you installed (from source or other) a version or software that is not in their repo.
You don't, you instead use CentOS.
He keeps differentiating, flying off on a tangent.